If Modi Sir cannot tackle the corruption of the Department of Income Tax, then who will step up to take charge? Indeed, Modi’s Challenge and Income Tax Corruption remain critical issues that unequivocally demand urgent attention. Consequently, it is imperative for leadership to address these issues head-on; moreover, ensuring accountability is essential for ultimately bringing about necessary reforms. Furthermore, the citizens undeniably deserve transparency and justice in the taxation system.

Nirmala Sita Raman, widely regarded as one of the most trusted advisors of our Prime Minister, has consequently received the financial portfolio. Her expertise and insights into fiscal policies not only significantly influence the nation’s economic strategies but also ensure a stable and prosperous financial future for all citizens.

Our prime minister has an excellent track record of speaking in the parliament of this country against corruption, which is truly exemplary. Moreover, his passionate speeches and unwavering commitment to transparency have not only inspired many citizens but also fostered trust in governance, thereby promoting the vital importance of integrity in public service for a brighter future.

Modi sir is the first prime minister whose image candidates use to contest the elections because the people of this country want to see him as prime minister.

Introduction

This is a complex situation involving allegations of corruption within the Income Tax Department. Furthermore, it encompasses a specific grievance lodged with the Prime Minister’s Office (PMOPG/E/2025/0037691). Additionally, a communication has been received regarding the non-filing of an Income Tax Return (ITR) based on an Annual Information Statement (AIS).(Modi’s Challenge & Income Tax Corruption)

Given the nature of the issue and the various entities involved, therefore, here is a structured breakdown of the information and, subsequently, the available institutional mechanisms:

🇮🇳 Analysis of the Income Tax Grievance

1. The Core Issue (Allegation & Communication)

Category	Details Provided
Grievance ID	PMOPG/E/2025/0037691
Grievance Subject (Modi’s Challenge & Income Tax Corruption)	Central Board of Direct Taxes (Income Tax) >> Corruption/Malpractices related (VCs, employees) >> Inaction by Income Tax Department
ITD Communication DIN	INSIGHT/CMP/02/2024-25/81230002569970001
Financial Year	2022-23
Alleged Transactions (AIS)	Business receipts (Rs. 46,576,920.00) and Rent received (Rs. 11,633,362.00) – Total: Rs. 58,210,282.00
Applicant’s Response	“Return filing is not required as the displayed information is not correct/wrong.”
Applicant’s Demand	Provision of bank details concerning the alleged transactions linked to the Permanent Account Number (PAN) GSWPS0850Q.

---

2. Current Grievance Status & Concerned Authorities (Modi’s Challenge & Income Tax Corruption)

Status/Authority	Details
Current Status	Under process (Date of Action: 19/03/2025)
Initial Recipient	Prime Minister’s Office
Actioning Officer	Sh. Gopalan Gurusamy (DGIT Systems Bengaluru)
Actioning Organisation	DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INCOME TAX (SYSTEM)
Specific ITD Officer Named	Sonal Singh, ITO E-Filing, DGIT(Systems) CPC, E-filing

---

3. Addressing the Political Context and Institutional Oversight

The user’s question, “If Modi Sir cannot tackle the corruption of the Department of income tax then who will do it?”, points to the highest levels of executive responsibility and accountability.

• Political Executive Oversight: The Minister of Finance (Nirmala Sitharaman) is the head of the ministry under which the Income Tax Department (via the Central Board of Direct Taxes – CBDT) operates. Moreover, it is the Finance Minister’s constitutional and executive duty to ensure the efficient and corruption-free functioning of all departments under the Ministry of Finance. (Modi’s Challenge & Income Tax Corruption)
• Administrative Oversight: The CBDT (Central Board of Direct Taxes) is, fundamentally, the apex body responsible for administering direct taxes in India. Consequently, the Chairperson and members of the CBDT bear the critical responsibility for the administration and integrity of the department.

Vigilance and Anti-Corruption: (Modi’s Challenge & Income Tax Corruption)

• The PMO/Cabinet Secretary: Indeed, the PMO serves as the highest executive office for grievance redressal and has the authority to initiate inquiries.
• Central Vigilance Commission (CVC): The apex governmental body in India actively addresses governmental corruption. It investigates and acts on corruption complaints against central government employees, including those in the Income Tax Department. (Modi’s Challenge & Income Tax Corruption)

Lokpal: This institution, therefore, acts as an ombudsman that diligently investigates allegations of corruption against public functionaries.

• Judicial Review: Citizens can approach the High Courts or the Supreme Court by filing writ petitions. This can occur in cases of violations of fundamental rights. Citizens may also do this when they can demonstrate that the government fails to act against corruption or illegal actions by its authorities.

In summary, the Prime Minister sets the tone and policy direction. Obviously, the direct responsibility for administrative integrity and grievance resolution within the Income Tax Department rests with the Finance Minister. Moreover, the institutional mechanisms involved include the CBDT, CVC, and the Judiciary.

---

💡 Next Steps for the Applicant

Based on the current status of “Under process,” it is essential, therefore, to wait patiently for the formal response from the DGIT (Systems) officer, Sh. Gopalan Gurusamy. (Modi’s Challenge & Income Tax Corruption)

Central Board of Direct Taxes (Income Tax) >> Corruption/Malpractices related (VCs, employees) >> Inaction by Income Tax Department
Most respected Sir, You sent the following communication today at 02:15 (4 hours ago) on my email yogimpsingh@gmail.com as follows.

Communication of income tax (Modi’s Challenge & Income Tax Corruption)

MAHESH PRATAP SINGH (XXXXX0850X).
YOGI M. P. SINGH MOH-SURE, SUREKAPURAM COLONY, JABALPUR ROAD, TAHSIL SADAR, MIRZAPUR,231001,UTTAR PRADESH.
DIN: INSIGHT/CMP/02/2024-25/81230002569970001.
Date: 18-03-2025.
Financial Year: 2022-23.
M/s.
As you meticulously review the records available with the Income Tax Department, you will notice that you have not filed your Income Tax Return (ITR) for the Financial Year 2022-23.
Moreover, in addition to this crucial point, we observe significant and high-value financial transactions in your Annual Information Statement (AIS). (Modi’s Challenge & Income Tax Corruption)
The details are as follows:
S. No.1 Information Category: Business receipts. Information Value Reported in AIS (Rs.) 46576920.00.
S. No.2 Additionally, Information Category: Rent received. Information Value Reported in AIS (Rs.) 11633362.00.

Total Information Value Reported (Modi’s Challenge & Income Tax Corruption)

Total Information Value Reported in AIS (Rs.) 58,210,282.00. It is important to note that, if the income return is not verified within the prescribed timeline after filing, the system consequently treats this return as invalid. Therefore, most respected sir, I kindly request you to review Pages 11 and 12 of the attached PDF document related to the grievance. In response to the query regarding whether the return has been filed, the applicant stated: “Return filing is not required as the displayed information is incorrect.” This statement was made by MAHESH PRATAP SINGH-GSWPS0850Q on 24-DEC-23 at 20:33:04, through the Portal.

Most respected sir, the working style of an entity determines its dignity, but what integrity does the Department of income tax uphold when it sends streaming notices to applicants’ emails without proper verification? (Modi’s Challenge & Income Tax Corruption)

I am again asking you the same question: why are you not providing the bank details concerning the transaction details of the permanent account number GSWPS0850Q​, which is obviously available to the Department of income tax? Furthermore, the Department of income tax not only collects the data of the bank accounts that paid the money but also those in which the money is credited, along with processing details concerning permanent account numbers.