Grievance Spotlight Action Against Criminal Breach: A Case of Alleged Breach of a Police-Mediated Agreement in Mirzapur

A formal grievance has been registered on the public portal, highlighting a case of alleged financial fraud and breach of a notarized agreement in Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh. The complainant, Santosh Kumar Maurya, seeks intervention from senior police officials to take urgent and necessary action against the accused, who have not only breached the terms of the agreement but have also displayed a blatant disregard for legal obligations.
This situation is particularly concerning as the accused also failed to adhere to a payment schedule that was established under police mediation, which was intended to provide a resolution to this matter. The repeated violations of the agreement have caused significant financial distress to the complainant, raising serious questions about the integrity of business practices in the region.
This case underscores the importance of taking decisive action against criminal breaches to uphold justice and protecting individuals from fraudulent activities that undermine trust in financial transactions and agreements.

---

Grievance Case File

• Registration Number: GOVUP/E/2024/0091459
• Complainant Name: Santosh Kumar Maurya
• Date of Receipt: 14/12/2024
• Concerned Authority: Government of Uttar Pradesh

---

Summary of the Complaint requiring Action Against Criminal Breach

The grievance details a financial dispute between two parties, which has escalated over time due to a lack of resolution and communication.
This ongoing disagreement has not only affected the financial stability of those involved but has also led to a significant strain on their personal and professional relationships.
It had previously resulted in a formal, notarized agreement created with the involvement of the Kotwali Dehat police station, signifying the seriousness of the matter and the intention to reach a fair outcome.
Despite this agreement, the issues persist, prompting Maurya to demand action against those who engage in criminal breaches, as these actions undermine the agreed terms and erode trust.
It is imperative to hold offenders accountable in order to prevent further violations and restore faith in the resolution process.
Taking action against a criminal breach is essential to deter further misconduct and to ensure that such disputes can be resolved effectively, fostering a sense of justice and stability for all parties involved.

Parties Involved:

• Complainant (First Party): Santosh Kumar Maurya, S/O Dashanand Maurya, residing at Village and Post Nakahara. Furthermore, he is associated with Police station Kotwali Dehat, located in Tehsil- Sadar, District Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, PIN code 231001.
• Accused (Second Party): Nanhkau Yadav, S/O Dangar Yadav, residing at Village-Lautiya. Furthermore, he is located at Post Nakahara, Police station Kotwali Dehat, Tehsil- Sadar, District Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, PIN code 231001.

Background of the Dispute:

Mr. Maurya provided a loan of ₹3,00,000 to Mr. Yadav in 2020, but Mr. Yadav only returned ₹80,000. This leaves an outstanding balance of ₹2,20,000. An action plan is required against this criminal breach to recover the amount.

The Mediated Agreement:

Both parties signed an agreement on July 26, 2024, and a notary verified it under the mediation of the staff at Police Station Kotwali Dehat, ensuring that all legal protocols were meticulously followed to protect the interests of both sides.
This agreement, crafted after several rounds of discussions and negotiations, laid the foundation for a collaborative relationship moving forward.
Key terms of this agreement included: a clear outline of responsibilities, a timeline for deliverables, and a framework for conflict resolution should any disputes arise in the future.

1. Moreover, Nanhkau Yadav must pay Santosh Kumar Maurya an installment of ₹1,30,000 by October 26, 2024.
2. The contract included a penalty clause. It states if the second party fails to meet the payment terms, it forfeits any amount already paid (“zero”). Consequently, the entire original outstanding amount becomes due, leading to the need for strict action against breaches.

Alleged Breach of Contract:

The grievance, filed on December 14, 2024, states that the second party has, unfortunately, failed to make the agreed-upon payment by the deadline. Consequently, the complainant alleges that this is a deliberate violation and, furthermore, a “criminal breach of trust.” This indicates an ulterior motive to defraud him.
Therefore, Mr. Maurya argues that allowing such violations to go unaddressed not only sets a negative precedent but also undermines the rule of law. This case underlines the critical need for prompt response and action against such breaches of criminal nature to maintain societal trust.

---

Current Status and Official Action

The state authorities are, indeed, actively looking into the grievance as of the latest update. They are thoroughly reviewing all relevant details and gathering necessary evidence to ensure a comprehensive evaluation of the situation.
Moreover, they ensure all appropriate measures are in place to uphold justice by evaluating actions against criminal breaches, while also engaging with community stakeholders to gain insights that could aid in their investigations.
Additionally, the authorities are committed to transparency throughout this process, providing regular updates to the public to maintain trust and confidence in their efforts.

• Current Status: Under process
• Date of Action: 14/12/2024

Officer Assigned to the Grievance:

The senior official in the Chief Minister’s Secretariat has received the case for further action. This recognizes the need for decisive action against a criminal breach.

• Officer Name: Shri Arvind Mohan (Joint Secretary), notably, plays a crucial role in the administration.
• Organisation: Uttar Pradesh
• Contact Address: Moreover, Chief Minister Secretariat, Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
• Email Address: arvind.12574@gov.in
• Contact Number: 05222226350

Applicant was itself implicated under section 126/135 of B.N.S. by SHO/CO

Vineet Kumar Maurya irritated with arbitrary and inconsistent reply of S.D.M. Sadar submitted representation before UPHRC