The ongoing battle for ancestral rights has become increasingly complex, as communities strive to reclaim their heritage and land amid legal and governmental challenges. Many families who have lived on these lands for generations are facing displacement and threats to their way of life. In light of these conflicts, police reports have surfaced, documenting tensions between local authorities and community members advocating for their rights. These developments are central to the Battle for Ancestral Rights & Police Report, highlighting incidents of protests, disputes, and, at times, confrontations, reflecting the broader struggle for social justice. As narratives unfold, solidarity among communities grows, emphasising the urgent need to recognise and preserve ancestral claims.

Battle for Ancestral Rights: Unmasking the Varasat Fraud & the Police Report Cover-Up in Mirzapur

The Battle for Ancestral Rights is not just a legal phrase; it is the lived reality of Sadhana Tiwari from Mirzapur. Her effort to reclaim her inheritance shows a troubling Police Report cover-up. The battle centres on three main issues: altered public records, police inaction, and the concealment of facts by the departments meant to uphold the law. Now that her appeal (S09/A/0719/2025) has reached the Uttar Pradesh Information Commission, the core issues show how authorities erase minor heirs from their records through legal means.

---

1. The Core of the Battle for Ancestral Rights: Process vs Property

The main barrier is the narrative created by CO Lalganj. The police and the Revenue Department call this case a ‘land dispute‘ just because no land is in the appellant’s father’s name. By doing so, they ignore the manipulation of the inheritance process.

The “Concocted” Narrative (Battle for Ancestral Rights & Police Report)

This misclassification goes against the law. The appellant does not say she has no ownership. Instead, she argues the authorities handled the inheritance (Varasat) process illegally. As a result, she lost her rights as a minor heir.

• The Fact: Siyakant Mishra died in 2001, while the property remained under the name of the grandfather, Shambhu Sharan, until 2007.
• The Fraud: In June 2007 (Case No. 255/2007), the inheritance (Varasat) was registered solely in the names of the surviving brothers, intentionally omitting the deceased brother’s daughter.
• The Victim’s Status: At the time of this legal manoeuvre, Sadhana Tiwari was a 12-year-old minor.

Instead of investigating how the records were illegally changed to exclude a minor heir, the police focus narrowly on the present state of the records, inadvertently protecting those responsible for her disenfranchisement.

---

2. Criminal Conspiracy and the 18-Day Liquidation

Property fraud is evident when a stolen title is quickly transferred to a third party. Fraudsters do this to make recovery hard. In this case, the quick events prove Criminal Conspiracy (Section 120B IPC).

The Rapid Sale

• June 19, 2007: The fraudulent inheritance is recorded, excluding the minor heir.
• July 7, 2007: Just 18 days later, the property is sold to a third party.

Yet, CO Lalganj has not investigated why, immediately after the suspicious Varasat, the land was sold so quickly. This rapid sale constitutes a criminal act under Sections 420 and 406 IPC.

---

3. The Police Report: Shielding the Accused or Investigating the Truth?

The Police Report that CO Lalganj submitted has attracted a heavy cloud of suspicion. On February 25, 2026, the applicant formally submitted a written representation. Nevertheless, the CO’s final report deliberately ignores these claims, raising serious questions about whether it constitutes an act of investigation. The appellant alleges that CO Lalganj willfully concealed her written submissions in the Police Report he forwarded to senior officers and the Information Commission. In doing so, he turned an official document into an instrument of suppression.

• Rather than reviewing relevant documentary evidence, the police largely rely on oral statements from the accused uncles, which contradict the 2007 written records.
• At the hearing on February 26, 2026, the police asked for 30 more days to record the applicant’s statement. But they had already written a report dismissing the matter as ‘civil.’

---

4. RTI Non-Compliance: The Final Barrier to Justice

The applicant filed her RTI on March 21, 2026. After more than 30 days, the authorities have not responded, delaying justice.

Withholding Public Information (Battle for Ancestral Rights & Police Report)

The Public Information Officer (PIO) and the CO have failed to provide:

1. A certified copy of the final Janch Akhya (Investigation Report).
2. The names and designations of the revenue officials who authorised the 2007 transfer while ignoring a minor heir.
3. The Reasoned Order explaining why these acts are not being Through this non-compliance, the Department of Revenue and the police strategically shield themselves — and, critically, the contents of the Police Report — from legal accountability before the State Information Commission. Furthermore, this obstruction opens yet another front in the ongoing Battle for Ancestral Rights. Going Battle for Ancestral Rights.

---

5. The Knowledge of Facts (K.O.F.) Submissions

Despite these barriers, the applicant has built and maintained a rigorous digital trail of evidence. Notably, the Commission’s K.O.F. Application List records a consistent history of submissions. The most recent filing, dated April 20, 2026 (Diary No: D-200420260047), further strengthens her case.

As a result of these submissions, the State Information Commissioner, Shakuntala Gautam, can see the truth directly. This is not just a boundary dispute between neighbours. It is a planned forgery of public records (Section 466 IPC) done by authorities against one person.

Conclusion: The Battle for Ancestral Rights Demands an Honest Police Report

When the police label the manipulation of public records as a mere “civil matter” and submit a misleading report, they empower future fraud and betray the heirs who trust the system for protection. Sadhana Tiwari’s fight exposes this unjust process, demanding not just information but accountability. The Commission must reject biased reporting and require a criminal FIR, ensuring those who erased a child’s inheritance—from both the Revenue Department and the police—are brought to justice. The law is only as strong as those who uphold it. Now is the moment for truth and accountability in the Battle for Ancestral Rights.

Based on the provided documents and portal records, here are the specific identification and contact details for the public authorities and your legal case:

1. Case and Application Identifiers (Battle for Ancestral Rights & Police Report)

These IDs are essential for tracking your legal proceedings and correspondence:

• RTI Registration Number: SPMZR/R/2026/60135
• UP Information Commission File Number: S09/A/0719/2025
• Appeal Registration Number: A-20250300419
• State Information Commission Diary Number: D-200420260047 (Dated 20/04/2026)
• Human Rights Commission Case Number: 10035/24/55/2025
• Police Investigation Reference: Jan-Su-On-120/2024

---

2. Public Authority Contact Details (Battle for Ancestral Rights & Police Report)

Authority / Role	Name of Official	Mobile Number	Email Address
PIO / ASP Operation	Manish Kumar Mishra	947356XXXX	aspopmzp@gmail.com
PIO (Commission Record)	Omprakash Singh	Not provided	asp-op.mi@up.gov.in
State Info. Commission	Shakuntala Gautam	Not provided	hearingcourts9.upic@up.gov.in
Jan Suchana Cell	Mirzapur Police	Not provided	jansuchanacellmzr@gmail.com
SP Mirzapur (FAA)	Office of SP	Not provided	spmzr-up@nic.in

---

3. Essential Web Links (Battle for Ancestral Rights & Police Report)

You can use these links to monitor the status of your applications and appeals:

• UP State Information Commission (Appeal Tracking): https://upsic.up.gov.in/
• RTI Online Uttar Pradesh (Request Status): https://rtionline.up.gov.in/
• UP Bhulekh (Revenue Records/Khatauni):http://164.100.230.206/okulakh/app/test/ropert

---

4. Local Authority Address (Battle for Ancestral Rights & Police Report)

• Circle Officer (CO) Lalganj Office: क्षेत्राधिकारी लालगंज, जनपद-मीरजापुर, उत्तर प्रदेश।
• Public Information Officer: Office of the Superintendent of Police, Mirzapur, PIN 231001.