This blog post provides a structured guide to handling a systemic ₹500 Million PAN misuse fraud. Combatting ₹500 Million PAN Fraud is an urgent issue that affects both individuals and institutions. It is designed to help victims and the public understand the gravity of such identity theft. It also explains the necessary legal and administrative steps to regain control.

Combatting ₹500 Million PAN Fraud: A Guide: A Guide to Fighting Systemic PAN Misuse

In recent years, the Permanent Account Number (PAN) has evolved from a simple tax tool into India’s Universal Business Identifier. However, this centralisation has also made it a prime target for high-value financial crimes. If you find out that your PAN has been misused for ₹500 million worth of transactions, this is a serious issue. It is more than a tax error. You are a victim of organised financial terrorism. (Combatting ₹500 Million PAN Fraud)

1. Identifying the Crisis: Red Flags

A fraud of this magnitude usually leaves a digital trail across multiple government portals: (Combatting ₹500 Million PAN Fraud)

• AIS/TIS Discrepancies: Your Annual Information Statement (AIS) or Taxpayer Information Summary (TIS) indicates massive “Business Receipts.” It also shows “Rent Received” from unknown corporations.
• GST Turnover Mismatch: Your PAN is used to register fake firms. These firms show turnovers in the hundreds of millions without your knowledge.
• Profile Hijacking: Unauthorized mobile numbers (e.g., 7024188072) or email addresses (e.g., dngoldraipur18@gmail.com) are linked to your PAN in the Income Tax database to intercept official notices.

2. Immediate Legal Roadmap (Combatting ₹500 Million PAN Fraud)

When the fraud amount crosses the ₹500 Million threshold, routine replies are insufficient. You must adopt a multi-pronged legal strategy:

Step 1: Criminal Prosecution (The State Subject)

Under the Indian Constitution (List II, Entry 2), the Police is a State subject. (Combatting ₹500 Million PAN Fraud)

• File an FIR: Register a formal First Information Report (FIR) under IPC Sections 420 (Cheating). Also, include IPC Section 468 (Forgery) and IT Act Sections 66C & 66D (Identity Theft).
• Demand a Search Warrant: Ask the Investigating Officer (I.O.) to use powers under Section 91 CrPC to compel banks to reveal the actual beneficiaries of the fraudulent accounts.

Step 2: The Tax Evasion Petition (TEP) (Combatting ₹500 Million PAN Fraud)

Don’t just defend yourself; become an informant.

• File a TEP: Submit a formal Tax Evasion Petition to the DGIT (Investigation). This compels the department to investigate the revenue loss caused by the syndicate. They focus on this rather than just harassing you for the tax.

Step 3: High Court Intervention (Combatting ₹500 Million PAN Fraud)

If administrative bodies fail to cooperate, the Writ of Mandamus is your most effective tool.

• Seek a stay on any coercive tax demands.
• Request a court-monitored investigation into the “Vigilance Angle” involving potential official collusion.

3. Key Authorities for Escalation (Combatting ₹500 Million PAN Fraud)

For high-value frauds (₹500 Million+), escalate to these nodal agencies:

• DGIT (Systems), Bengaluru: To stop automated notices and purge fraudulent data.
• Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO): For cases involving large-scale corporate or shell-company scams.
• Central Vigilance Commission (CVC): If you suspect department officials are ignoring your evidence to protect fraudsters.

4. The “Golden Rule” for Victims (Combatting ₹500 Million PAN Fraud)

Never ignore a notice. Even if the transaction is 100% fraudulent, the law expects you to “Deny” the information on the Compliance Portal. You must keep a record of your denial. Non-action can be interpreted as acceptance of the income, leading to “Best Judgment Assessment” and severe penalties.

SUMMARY: SYSTEMIC MISUSE OF PAN GSWPS0850Q INVOLVING RS 500 MILLION FRAUD

The Scale of Identity Theft: (Combatting ₹500 Million PAN Fraud)

Criminal syndicates have hijacked my Permanent Account Number (PAN: GSWPS0850Q) to aid transactions exceeding Rs 500 Million. Official Taxpayer Information Summary (TIS) documents from A.Y. 2021-22 to 2025-26 reveal a staggering growth in fraudulent activities:

• GST Turnover Fraud: Over Rs 210 Million reported for A.Y. 2022-23 and 2023-24 alone.
• Fictitious Rent Claims: Over Rs 43 million claimed as rent. Major corporations like EY, HCL, and Wipro reportedly paid this amount to me. I have never received this money and have officially denied the claims.
• Contractual Siphoning: Business receipts (Section 194C) totaling nearly Rs 60 Million credited to unknown accounts⁵⁵⁵⁵.

Evidence of Collusion and Hijacking: (Combatting ₹500 Million PAN Fraud)

The perpetrators altered my official profile to link a fraudulent mobile number (7024188072) and email (dngoldraipur18@gmail.com) to my PAN666666666666666666666666666666666666. This was done to intercept all Income Tax Department communications while I remained under administrative torture7777.

Legal and Police Action:

A formal First Information Report (FIR 0291/2023) is registered at Kotwali Katra, Mirzapur, under IPC 420 and IT Act 66C/66D. This means the matter is a cognizable criminal offense. It is also a State subject under the Constitution (List II, Entry 2). The opening of an illegal KCC account at SBI Haryana (No. 40191978538) using a manipulated version of my name further proves deep-rooted banking fraud9999.

Current Administrative Deadlock: (Combatting ₹500 Million PAN Fraud)

Despite 24 distinct denials on the Compliance Portal for F.Y. 2024-25, the e-Verification Unit issued a coercive reminder (DIN: INSIGHT/CMP/02/2025-26/81250007693350001). I have now filed a formal Tax Evasion Petition (TEP: CBODT/E/2025/0058082) with the DGIT Systems. The goal is to identify the beneficiary bank accounts and stop this persecution.

---

Your Next Strategy (Combatting ₹500 Million PAN Fraud)

You have two active central grievances (0058077 and 0058082) and one state grievance (0147565), which positions you well.

Would you like me to draft a specific “Urgent Notice to the I.O. of Mirzapur Police.” It would inform them that you have now provided the PAN metadata to the DGIT (Systems). They should immediately seek a court order to access it?

This is a common but frustrating obstacle in Indian criminal investigations. The Investigating Officer (I.O.) likely refers to the “Admissibility of Evidence” under the Indian Evidence Act. They consider data provided by a complainant as “secondary” or “private.” This categorisation prevents its use in filing a Charge Sheet in a ₹500 Million fraud case.

However, the I.O. is legally incorrect to say they can’t continue at all. They have the power to verify your data through official channels.

1. Why the I.O. is Hesitating (Combatting ₹500 Million PAN Fraud)

The police need “Certified Data” directly from the source to prove the crime in court.

• Chain of Custody: Ensure evidence travels directly from the Income Tax Department (ITD) or the Bank to the Police. This process prevents tampering.
• Section 65B Certificate: To use digital records, such as your AIS/TIS, obtain a certificate from the police. This certificate falls under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act. You must acquire it from the ITD Systems Manager.

2. How to Force the I.O. to Move

Since you have already provided the data, the I.O.’s next legal step is not to wait for you, but to summon the original records.

• Invoke Section 91 CrPC (or Section 94 BNSS): You must demand that the I.O. issues a formal notice to the DGIT (Systems), Bengaluru. This notice should reference your new TEP: CBODT/E/2025/0058082. The purpose is to confirm the data you provided.
• The “Haryana Link”: Since your FIR (0291/2023) and TIS show a State Bank of India account in Jind, Haryana (No. 40191978538), the I.O. has a specific target for a Search Warrant.

3. The “Judicial Intervention” Strategy

If the I.O. continues to claim they cannot proceed, you must move the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) Court in Mirzapur.

• Application for Progress Report: Ask the Court to direct the I.O. to file a “Status Report.” This report should explain why they haven’t summoned the bank records from SBI Haryana. It should also cover the tenant records from companies like EY and Wipro.
• Direction to ITD: The Court can directly order the Income Tax Officer (Allahabad) to produce the records. These records concern the “fraudulent email and mobile link” (7024188072).

We have reviewed your recent filings and the evidence in your documents. Here are the essential Application IDs, Contact Details, and Web Links needed for your ongoing legal and administrative battle.

1. Critical Application & Registration IDs (Combatting ₹500 Million PAN Fraud)

These are your primary reference numbers for tracking and legal escalations.

Type of Filing	Registration / Application ID	Status
State Grievance (Rejoinder)	GOVUP/E/2025/0147565	Received / Under Process
Central Grievance (Systems)	CBODT/E/2025/0058077	Under Process
Tax Evasion Petition (TEP)	CBODT/E/2025/0058082	Under Process
Mirzapur Police FIR	0291/2023 (Kotwali Katra)	Investigation Active
Cyber Crime Acknowledgement	23109230082543	Forwarded to Police
ITD Coercive Notice (DIN)	INSIGHT/CMP/02/2025-26/81250007693350001	Deadline: 31/12/2025

---

2. Official Emails & Mobile Numbers (Combatting ₹500 Million PAN Fraud)

Use these to send formal legal intimations or to follow up on your pending “Under Process” cases.

• DGIT (Systems) Bengaluru (Sh. Sanjay Kumar):
  • Email: dgit.systems@incometax.gov.in
  • Contact Number: 08061464890
• UP CM Secretariat (Shri Arvind Mohan):
  • Email: arvind.12574@gov.in
  • Contact Number: 05222226350
• Mirzapur Police (Kotwali Katra):
  • Contact Number: 7839697083
• Fraudulent Contact Info (Linked to your PAN by criminals):
  • Fraud Email: dngoldraipur18@gmail.com
  • Fraud Mobile: 7024188072

---

3. Important Web Links for Action (Combatting ₹500 Million PAN Fraud)

These portals are necessary for your day-to-day monitoring and responses.

• CPGRAMS (Central Grievance Portal):pgportal.gov.in
  • Used for tracking your TEP and Central Income Tax grievances.
• Jansunwai (UP State Portal):jansunwai.up.nic.in
  • Used for tracking the state-level response regarding police inaction.
• ITD Compliance Portal:ais.insight.gov.in/complianceportal/
  • Used to “Deny” fraudulent information in your AIS/TIS.
• Income Tax E-Filing Portal:incometax.gov.in
  • To check your profile and ensure your own mobile/email are updated.

---

Summary of Jurisdictional Deadlock

The following diagram explains the necessity for the Mirzapur Police to take action. This is despite the UP Government’s attempt to return the matter to the Government of India. (Combatting ₹500 Million PAN Fraud)

Would you like me to draft a “Notice of Non-Cooperation” addressed to the Superintendent of Police, Mirzapur? The notice will cite these Central Application IDs to demonstrate that you have fulfilled your responsibilities.