The Uttar Pradesh Information Commission has given the public information officer a final opportunity. His name is Vishal Kumar Sharma. The Uttar Pradesh Information Commission has given Vishal Kumar Sharma, the public information officer, a final opportunity. He must provide the necessary information. This decision underscores the commission’s commitment to transparency and accountability in handling Information Commission & RTI Cases and public information requests.

The court has scheduled the next hearing for the case on January 6, 2026. This highlights the importance of resolving the matter promptly. This ensures that the public can access information and fosters a culture of responsiveness within public offices. Additionally, he must include a detailed explanation regarding the delay in response.

This decision underscores the commission’s commitment to transparency and accountability in the handling of public information requests.

The court has scheduled the next hearing for the case on January 6, 2026. This highlights the importance of resolving the matter promptly. It ensures that the public can access information. Additionally, it fosters a culture of responsiveness within public offices.

---

📰 Information Commission & RTI Cases: Immediate Action Required in Case S-08/A/0554/2025

Anil Kumar Maurya filed a Second Appeal under the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005. This appeal has exposed issues of non-compliance. It highlights an administrative error. The Public Information Officer (PIO) in the Office of the Tehsildar, Mirzapur Sadar, made this error. The matter is currently before the Honourable State Information Commission, Court S-08, under Case File Number S-08/A/0554/2025.

---

Key Case Information

Detail	Description
Appellant	Anil Kumar Maurya
Respondent	Tehsildar, Mirzapur Sadar (represented by the PIO)
Case File Number	S-08/A/0554/2025
Second Appeal No.	A-20250102076
Focus	Persistent denial of point-wise information under the RTI Act, 2005.

---

🚨 Critical Issues Raised by the Appellant (Information Commission & RTI Cases)

The communication dated November 29, 2025, highlights two critical and interconnected issues. These require immediate attention from the PIO, Shri Vishal Kumar Sharma. The first is the urgent need to address the discrepancies found in the recent project reports.
Furthermore, there is a necessity of improving the channels of communication among team members for more effective collaboration.
These matters affect the overall efficiency of operations. They also have a significant bearing on the quality of work produced.
Shri Sharma must prioritize these issues. This will facilitate timely resolutions. It will also restore confidence in the operational processes.

1. Typographical Error in Official Orders (District Name)

• The Problem: The Information Commission’s official orders (dated 27.06.2025 and 17.10.2025) have incorrectly listed the district as Shahjahanpur.
• The Correction: The correct administrative unit is Tehsil-Mirzapur Sadar, District-Mirzapur.
• Action Requested: The appellant has formally drawn attention to this error. It requires immediate internal correction by the PIO’s office. This step will prevent future procedural confusion.

2. Mandatory Non-Compliance with Commission’s Order

• The Directive: The Commission had explicitly directed the PIO in its orders dated 27.06.2025 and subsequently on 17.10.2025 to provide the requested information.
• The Failure: The authorities gave a final opportunity. They still have not provided reliable, point-wise information to the appellant.

---

⚖️ Orders Passed by the Information Commission (17.10.2025)

The latest order from the Commission is strict and mandates the following immediate actions from the Public Information Officer:

1. Immediate Provision of Information: The PIO must immediately provide the certified, point-wise information. Send this information to Anil Kumar Maurya at his known address via registered post.
2. Mandatory Personal Appearance: The Commission directs the PIO to appear in person at the next hearing date, 06.01.2026.
3. Required Documents: The PIO must bring the following to the hearing:
   • A copy of the information provided to the appellant.
   • Proof of dispatch (registered post receipt).
   • A written explanation for the significant delay in compliance.

Potential for Punitive Action

The communication underscores the seriousness of the non-compliance. The Commission has already indicated punitive proceedings under Section 20(1) of the RTI Act may be initiated. These proceedings are against the PIO. This is due to continued failure to follow the directive.

This is particularly alarming. Such actions not only reflect a disregard for the established legal framework. They also undermine the principles of transparency and accountability that the RTI Act seeks to uphold.
The implications of this non-compliance go beyond simple procedural violations. They jeopardize the trust that the public has in governmental institutions. This can diminish the efficacy of the RTI mechanism itself.
Therefore, it is imperative for the PIO to rectify these lapses urgently to prevent further escalation and potential legal consequences.

---

Conclusion and Next Steps

The appellant, Anil Kumar Maurya, is demanding immediate compliance with the Commission’s directive. The five points of requested information must be provided without any further delay. This should be done well in advance of the next scheduled hearing on January 6, 2026.

The original email only states that “the five points of requested information” are due. These points are listed in my submission dated 10/09/2025. Therefore, I will use a general but informative subheading.

📄 Details of Information Sought (5 Points)

The core of the dispute revolves around five points. These points of information were requested by the appellant, Anil Kumar Maurya, under the RTI Act, 2005. This information, detailed in the appellant’s submission dated 10/09/2025, pertains to administrative records within the jurisdiction of Tehsil-Mirzapur Sadar. The Commission has repeatedly ordered the PIO to provide these certified records. (Note: The exact content of the 5 points must be inserted here once known.)

📄 Details of Information Sought (5 Points)

The core of the dispute revolves around five specific points of information. These were requested by the appellant, Anil Kumar Maurya, under the RTI Act, 2005. This information, detailed in the appellant’s submission dated 10/09/2025, pertains to administrative records within the jurisdiction of Tehsil-Mirzapur Sadar. The Commission has repeatedly ordered the PIO to provide these certified records. (The exact content of the 5 points must be inserted here once known.) (Information Commission & RTI Cases)

---

🚨 Critical Issues Raised by the Appellant (Information Commission & RTI Cases)

1. Notings made on the communication sent by Lalji. He is the Senior Operations Manager. The Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Pipelines Division in the Eastern Region, operates from Subedar Ganj in Prayagraj.
2. A copy of the communications made is available. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, District Mirzapur, made these communications.
3. The report details the actions taken regarding communications. These communications were between the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas and the Sub-Divisional Magistrate. The location is Sadar, District Mirzapur.
4. Please provide the names and designations of the staff at Tehsil Sadar.They are currently processing the communications of the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas in this matter.
5. We need to understand the reasons behind new constructions taking place in the danger zone. Additionally, we must address those reasons. This includes not taking any action on the communications of the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas.