Key Takeaways from This Powerful Story of RTI Appeal
1. The RTI Act Empowers Citizens, but Officials Often Resist Transparency
Although the RTI Act exists to promote openness, citizens frequently encounter evasive replies, as seen when the PIO diverted the applicant to “collect documents from the court.” This is a powerful story of RTI Appeal, showing that persistence is essential.
2. Police Must Share Office Copies, Even if Originals Go to Court (Powerful Story of RTI Appeal)
The PIO’s claim that documents were “sent to the court” was not valid. Public authorities always retain office copies of charge‑sheets, medical reports, and forwarding memos. Therefore, refusal was unjustified.
3. Non‑responsive Answers Undermine the RTI Process
Instead of answering whether any rule limits grievance submissions, the PIO discussed charge‑sheet timelines—showing non‑application of mind and avoidance of actual questions.
4. Case Diary References Cannot Be Used to Evade Disclosure (Powerful Story of RTI Appeal)
Even though case diaries are confidential, PIOs must provide summaries or extracts or invoke proper exemptions. Simply saying “information is in the case diary” is not legally acceptable.
5. FAA Must Correct PIO Errors, Not Repeat Them (Powerful Story of RTI Appeal)
The First Appellate Authority merely echoed the PIO’s misleading reply and claimed the information was sent by post, without evidence. This failure made the Second Appeal necessary.
6. Medical Records Play a Critical Investigative Role
Because the fracture was medically documented, the police should have provided copies or summaries of medical board communications. Withholding them obstructed understanding of the investigation.
7. Multiple RTI Violations Strengthened the Appeal
The PIO and FAA violated Sections 7(1), 19(1), and 19(5) by not responding correctly, not providing timely information, and failing to justify refusals. These lapses reinforced the applicant’s case.
8. The Second Appeal Shows Why Determination Matters
By filing Second Appeal A‑20260301718, the applicant demonstrated resilience. She sought penalties, disciplinary action, and compensation—turning her experience into a Powerful Story of RTI Appeal.
9. Transparency Improves Only When Citizens Challenge Evasion
The case proves that administrative accountability does not happen automatically. Instead, it arises when individuals question misleading responses, document procedural lapses, and assert their rights.
The Fight for Transparency: A Powerful Story of RTI Appeal in NCR 104/2024
The Right to Information Act exists so that citizens can challenge opacity and insist on accountability. However, when officials try to avoid disclosure, the journey becomes long and difficult. This article presents a Powerful Story of RTI Appeal, centred on NCR 104/2024 from Mirzapur, where an applicant pushed back against misleading replies and eventually reached the Uttar Pradesh Information Commission.
By understanding the core issues in this case, readers can better appreciate how the RTI Act empowers citizens and why determined follow‑up is critical.
Understanding the Context Behind NCR 104/2024
A Case That Raised Serious Questions
NCR 104/2024 involved a family dispute, but it also included a medically documented thumb fracture. The police eventually filed Charge‑Sheet Nil/2025 dated 24.10.2025 under sections 115(2) and 352 BNS. Since the applicant required clarity about the investigation, she filed an RTI request seeking documents and explanations.
What the Applicant Sought
To promote transparency, she asked for:
- The certified charge‑sheet
- Copies of medical and medico‑legal documents
- Procedures for retrieving her original medical papers
- Records of police action on the fracture
- Rules concerning grievance submissions to senior officers
She expected straightforward answers. Instead, she faced resistance.
Core Issue 1: PIO’s Repeated Deflection to the Court
An Attempt to Shift Responsibility
The PIO repeatedly replied that documents had been “sent to the court.” Although this seemed simple, it contradicted the RTI Act. Police departments always maintain office copies of charge‑sheets, annexures, forwarding memos, and correspondence with medical authorities.
Why This Deflection Was Wrong
Because the RTI Act places the duty of disclosure on the public authority holding the information, the PIO should have provided the copies. Instead, he diverted the applicant to the court without offering a legal justification. By doing so, he undermined the very purpose of RTI and forced the applicant to escalate her request. This moment marked the beginning of her Powerful Story of RTI Appeal.
Core Issue 2: Non‑Responsive Reply About Grievance Limits
A Completely Unrelated Answer
The applicant sought clarity on whether any rule restricts the number of grievances she could submit to senior police officials. Shockingly, the PIO responded by talking about “no time limit for filing a charge‑sheet.”
Why This Point Matters
This behaviour highlighted:
- A lack of understanding of the RTI obligation
- A refusal to engage with the actual question
- An attempt to distract the applicant from her legitimate concern
The RTI Act requires PIOs to either provide existing records or confirm that no such record exists. Instead, the applicant received an irrelevant answer, strengthening the case for her appeal.
Core Issue 3: Vague Reply on Injury‑Related Action (Powerful Story of RTI Appeal)
“Information Is in the Case Diary” — A Misleading Statement
The applicant requested police findings regarding her thumb fracture. The PIO merely replied that the information “is in the case diary.” This answer avoided transparency, because RTI allows citizens access to summaries or extracts even when case diaries remain confidential.
Why This Response Failed Legally
The PIO should have:
- Provided a summary of the findings,
- Shared relevant extracts, or
- Cited Section 8(1)(h) with reasoning, if disclosure could impede investigation.
Instead, he avoided all three options. Consequently, this became another strong point in her Powerful Story of RTI Appeal.
Core Issue 4: FAA Repeated the PIO’s Errors
A Missed Opportunity for Accountability
The First Appellate Authority responded that the information was “sent by post.” Unfortunately, the applicant never received anything. Moreover, no dispatch number or proof was provided.
Why the FAA’s Role Is Crucial
Because the FAA must independently review RTI requests, she should have corrected the PIO’s failures. Instead, she repeated them, which forced the applicant to take her fight to the Uttar Pradesh Information Commission.
Core Issue 5: Mishandling of Medical Board Evidence (Powerful Story of RTI Appeal)
Medical Records With High Investigative Value
The Radiology Report clearly showed a fracture. The Medical Board and CMO communications added further context. These documents directly affected the investigation because they related to the claimed injury.
Why the Applicant Deserved Access
The applicant had every right to obtain copies or summaries since:
- She provided the original medical documents,
- The police relied on these records, and
- The RTI Act supports full transparency regarding such inputs.
By refusing access, the police limited her ability to understand how her injury was evaluated.
Core Issue 6: Multiple RTI Violations (Powerful Story of RTI Appeal)
A Pattern of Avoidance
Throughout the process, the authorities ignored several RTI provisions, including:
- Section 7(1): Failure to provide timely information
- Section 19(1): FAA’s incomplete review
- Section 19(5): PIO’s obligation to justify refusal
Each violation pushed the applicant further toward the Second Appeal stage.
Core Issue 7: The Second Appeal Before the Uttar Pradesh Information Commission
A Turning Point in the Powerful Story of RTI Appeal
After months of misleading replies, the applicant filed Second Appeal A‑20260301718. She requested:
- Point‑wise certified information
- Penalty proceedings
- Disciplinary action
- Compensation for harassment
- An online hearing
This step transformed her effort into a Powerful Story of RTI Appeal, showing both resilience and legal awareness.
Conclusion: How Persistence Protects Transparency (Powerful Story of RTI Appeal)
Although the RTI process became complicated, the applicant continued her pursuit of truth. Her case highlights why citizens must assert their rights and challenge evasive replies. Through her actions, she exposed weaknesses in administrative transparency and proved that determined follow‑up can push the system toward accountability.
Ultimately, her Powerful Story of RTI Appeal reminds us that transparency does not arrive automatically—it emerges when individuals refuse to accept silence.
Application IDs, Emails, Mobile Numbers, and Web Link Details of the Concerned Public Authorities
1. RTI Application Details (Powerful Story of RTI Appeal)
RTI (Section 6(1))
- Application Number: SPMZR/R/2025/60298
- Transaction ID: SPMZRR20250000000344
- Date of Filing: 07‑11‑2025
2. First Appeal Details
First Appeal (Section 19(1))
- Appeal Number: SPMZR/A/2025/60056
- Date of Filing: 06‑12‑2025
- FAA Order Date: 27‑12‑2025
3. Second Appeal Details (UP Information Commission)
UPIC Appeal Details
- Second Appeal Registration Number: A‑20260301718
- UPIC Reference ID: UPICR20250000353
- Date Filed: 20‑03‑2026
UPIC Contact
- Website: https://upic.gov.in
- Hearing Type: Online
- Hearing Email (Applicant): mahimamauryagonasar@gmail.com
- Hearing Mobile (Applicant): 9198010433
4. Public Information Officer (PIO) – SP Office Mirzapur
PIO Details (Powerful Story of RTI Appeal)
- Name: Mr. Manish Kumar Mishra
- Designation: Additional Superintendent of Police (Operation)
- Office Address: Superintendent of Police Office, Mirzapur
- Office PIN Code: 231001
- Mobile Number: 9454401105
- Email: asp-op.mi@up.gov.in
Related Web Links
- UP Police Website: https://uppolice.gov.in
5. First Appellate Authority (FAA) – SP Mirzapur (Powerful Story of RTI Appeal)
FAA Details
- Name: Smt. Aparna Rajat Kaushik
- Designation: Superintendent of Police, Mirzapur
- Office Address: Superintendent of Police Office, Mirzapur
- Office PIN Code: 231001
- Mobile Number: 9454400299
- Office Phone: 05442‑252578
- Email: spmzr-up@nic.in
Related Web Link
- NIC Mirzapur District Portal: https://mirzapur.nic.in
6. Applicant Details (As Recorded by UPIC)
Appellant Information (Powerful Story of RTI Appeal)
- Name: Mahima Maurya
- Address: ग्राम गोड़सर, पोस्ट कलना, मिर्जापुर
- PIN Code: 231303
- Mobile: 9198010433
- Email: mahimamauryagonasar@gmail.com
7. Quick Reference Table (Powerful Story of RTI Appeal)
Authorities and Their Contact Information
| Authority | Name | Mobile | Office PIN | Reference ID | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIO | Manish Kumar Mishra | asp-op.mi@up.gov.in | 9454401105 | 231001 | SPMZR/R/2025/60298 |
| FAA | Aparna Rajat Kaushik | spmzr-up@nic.in | 9454400299 | 231001 | SPMZR/A/2025/60056 |
| UPIC | Uttar Pradesh Information Commission | upic.gov.in | — |
Facing a similar challenge? Share the details in the box below, and our team of experts will do their best to help.