🚨 Medical Board Inquiry Delays in Uttar Pradesh: Seeking Answers on Medical Board Inquiry Status in Mirzapur

The Right to Information (RTI) Act is a critical tool for citizens seeking transparency. Applicant Mahima Maurya recently filed an appeal against the Medical and Health Directorate in Uttar Pradesh. She is drawing attention to Medical Board Inquiry Delays. This appeal highlights a common frustration. The Public Information Officer (PIO) failed to respond within the mandated time limit.

This structured breakdown summarizes the core issue, the steps taken, and the relief sought.

---

1. The Core Issue: Unanswered Inquiry into a Medical Board

The central matter revolves around a specific request for information. It concerns a Medical Board constituted by the Chief Medical Officer (CMO), Mirzapur.

• Subject of Inquiry: Proceedings and final report of a Medical Board established vide Letter No. Mu.C.Adhikari/Me.Bo./2025-26/607 dated 29.08.2025, which directly relates to the applicant, Mahima Maurya.
• Information Sought (Original RTI):
  • Certified copy of the Medical Board constitution letter.
  • Current status of the inquiry being conducted.
  • Copies of correspondence with the District Police (Vindhyachal Police Station, ASP City).
  • Name, designation, and posting details of all Medical Board members.
  • Certified copy of the Final Inquiry Report and Action Taken Report (ATR).

2. Failure to Respond: The Grounds for Appeal

The First Appeal is filed under Section 19(1) of the RTI Act, 2005. It is based entirely on the PIO’s silence. The law interprets this silence as a “Deemed Refusal”. (Medical Board Inquiry Delays)

• PIO Approached: CMO, Mirzapur.
• RTI Application No.: DIRMH/R/2025/66710
• Date of Filing: 25/10/2025
• Statutory Deadline (30 Days): Approximately 24/11/2025
• Grounds for Appeal: The CMO’s office did not respond, provide information, or communicate officially. There was no transfer or rejection order. The appellant, Mahima Maurya, did not receive anything as of the appeal date (15/12/2025).

3. The Appeal and Relief Sought

Having exhausted the initial waiting period, the appellant has now elevated the matter to the First Appellate Authority (FAA). The Director of Health (Nodal Officer) has registered the appeal as DIRMH/A/2025/62027. AD Mirzapur serves as the FAA, as listed in the details. (Medical Board Inquiry Delays)

The appeal seeks specific and forceful intervention from the FAA:

• Immediate Information Disclosure: The CMO of Mirzapur receives a directive. They must provide the complete, correct, and certified information sought in the original RTI application. Complete this within a strict 10-day time frame.
• Action Against PIO: The authorities are considering imposing the penalty provision under Section 20(1) of the RTI Act.This action targets the PIO for their unconscionable delay. It also targets their willful failure to discharge their statutory duty. This highlights the seriousness of violating the time limit prescribed in the Act.

---

💡 Why This Matters (Medical Board Inquiry Delays)

This case underscores the fundamental principle of the RTI Act: information must be provided within the stipulated time. A PIO must adhere to the 30-day limit. If they fail, the First Appellate Authority must ensure accountability. They also must guarantee the citizen’s right to know. The demand for the Final Inquiry Report is crucial. The imposition of penalties serves as a powerful reminder that administrative inaction is not permissible under the RTI framework.

Yes, providing an overview of the legal process and timelines will be very helpful. Since the process involves distinct steps and time limits, a diagram will greatly clarify the workflow.

Here is a summary of the expected process following the submission of the First Appeal (DIRMH/A/2025/62027):

---

⏳ What Happens Next: The First Appeal Process

After filing the First Appeal under Section 19(1) of the RTI Act, the process moves to the First Appellate Authority (FAA). The FAA handles the matter from then on. The FAA takes over the handling of the case entirely. In this case, the FAA is the AD Mirzapur. The AD Mirzapur is the Assistant Director or Additional Director, senior to the CMO. The FAA now functions in a quasi-judicial capacity.

1. FAA’s Statutory Obligations and Timeline

The FAA has a strict timeline to dispose of the appeal:

Stage	Action	Statutory Timeline
Appeal Review & Hearing	The FAA must review the appeal. They must give the Appellant (Mahima Maurya) an opportunity to be heard. The PIO (CMO Mirzapur) must also be given a chance to be heard (Principle of Natural Justice).	Not explicitly defined, but must occur within the disposal period.
Appeal Disposal	The FAA must issue a reasoned, speaking order addressing the grounds of the appeal (the PIO’s non-response).	30 days from the date of receipt of the appeal (15/12/2025).
Extended Disposal (if necessary)	The FAA can extend the disposal period by up to 15 days. They must record the reasons for the extension in writing.	Maximum of 45 days from the date of filing.

2. Possible Outcomes of the FAA’s Order

The FAA’s decision will likely fall into one of two categories, given that the ground for appeal is a “No Response” (Deemed Refusal): (Medical Board Inquiry Delays)

• Order for Disclosure (Most Likely): The FAA will direct the PIO (CMO Mirzapur) to provide the information requested. The information is in the original RTI application. The order will specify a new, strict deadline (e.g., within 7 or 10 days) for the PIO to comply.
• Order for Justification/Partial Disclosure: The PIO may successfully argue that the information is exempt. This exemption falls under Sections 8 or 9 of the Act. In such cases, the FAA may uphold the deemed refusal. The FAA must provide clear reasons. Since the PIO failed to issue a rejection order earlier, this outcome is less common but possible.

3. Focus on Penalties (Section 20)

The appeal specifically requested the FAA to consider imposing a penalty. Therefore, the FAA must address this point in the final order.

• The FAA, while senior to the PIO, does not have the power to impose the penalty directly. That power rests solely with the State Information Commission (SIC) (the Second Appellate Authority).
• However, the FAA can and should record a finding of fact regarding the PIO’s misconduct (willful failure to respond). This finding serves as crucial evidence if the applicant chooses to file a Second Appeal to the SIC.

4. Path to Second Appeal (Medical Board Inquiry Delays)

If Mahima Maurya is not satisfied with the FAA’s decision, she can file a second appeal. This may occur if the FAA delays the order beyond 45 days. Another possibility is that the PIO fails to follow the FAA’s directives.

• Second Appeal Authority: State Information Commission (SIC).
• Second Appeal Deadline: The FAA must make a decision within 90 days. This timeframe starts from either the end of the 45-day maximum period. Alternatively, it can be from the date when the information seeker actually received the decision.

I can certainly provide the relevant web links, mobile numbers, and email addresses. Different authorities in Uttar Pradesh handle the various aspects of the RTI process.

I will focus on the contact details for the PublicAuthority. Moreover,I will focus on the Nodal Officer/FAA. I will also focus on the Second Appellate Authority (State Information Commission).

🔗 Key Contacts for RTI in Uttar Pradesh

1. Public Authority (Medical and Health Directorate, UP) (Medical Board Inquiry Delays)

Entity	Detail	Phone/Mobile	Email	Website/Portal
PIO (Original Authority)	CMO, Mirzapur	9454455171 (From filing details)	cmomzp$$at$$gmail$$dot$$com (From filing details)	DGMIS Portal
Nodal Officer (Director Health)	Director Health (Nodal Officer)	9451679475 (From filing details)	dgmhsrti$$at$$gmail$$dot$$com (From filing details)	Health and Family Welfare UP

2. Uttar Pradesh RTI Online Portal (Medical Board Inquiry Delays)

This is the primary portal for filing RTIs and First Appeals online in Uttar Pradesh.

• RTI Online Portal: https://rtionline.up.gov.in/
• Technical Helpline Number: 0522-7118629 (Technical queries related to the portal, 10:00 AM to 5:00 PM on working days)
• Technical Helpline Email: onlinertihelpline$$dot$$up$$at$$gov$$dot$$in

3. Second Appellate Authority (State Information Commission, UP)

If the FAA does not resolve the matter within the stipulated 30-45 days, you need to take the next step. This involves making the Second Appeal to the State Information Commission. (Medical Board Inquiry Delays)

Entity	Detail	Phone Number (Office)	Email	Website
UP State Information Commission (UPSIC)	7/7A, RTI Bhawan, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow, UP	0522-2724930	webmaster-upic$$at$$up$$dot$$gov$$dot$$in	https://upsic.up.gov.in/
PIO, UPSIC	Sri Mumtaz Ahmed, Administrative Officer	–	jansu-section$$dot$$upic$$at$$up$$dot$$gov$$dot$$in	–

---

Important Note: The contact numbers for the PIO (CMO Mirzapur) come directly from the details you provided. You included these in the initial RTI and appeal forms. The contact numbers for the Nodal Officer (Director Health) are also taken directly from these details. For official correspondence, it is best to use the complete postal address in addition to the email/phone.