Introduction Sonal Singh’s Warning

Sonal Singh issues a warning about the misuse of Permanent Account Number (PAN), specifically highlighting a tragic incident that showcases vulnerabilities within the Indian taxation system. In this context, this lady officer from the income tax department delivers a stern warning through an official notice to Yogi M. P. Singh, who, unfortunately, becomes a victim of PAN misuse. Consequently, the misuse of PAN impacts not only individuals like Yogi but also the integrity of tax collection and financial security in the country. Furthermore, it raises significant concerns about identity theft and fraud, with many citizens remaining unaware that someone is using their PAN incorrectly in financial transactions. Obviously, this incident serves as a crucial reminder for individuals to stay vigilant about their personal information and for authorities to implement more robust measures to protect citizens from such exploitation.

Sonal Singh’s Warning & PAN Misuse: A Citizen’s Fight Against PAN Identity Theft and Systemic Apathy

In a digital age where the Permanent Account Number (PAN) serves as the cornerstone of financial identity in India, Mahesh Pratap Singh (Yogi M. P. Singh) faces an incredibly harrowing cautionary tale. Despite this, he struggles for “two square meals,” while a phantom fortune of over ₹34.38 crore continues to haunt him, attributed to his identity by the Income Tax Department.

This case, documented under various grievance registrations including PMOPG/E/2024/0184722 and CBODT/E/2025/0013108, highlights a terrifying intersection of high-tech fraud, administrative contradictions, and the desperate plea for justice from the highest offices of the land.

---

The Anatomy of a Identity Fraud

The core issue is as staggering as it is simple: Identity Misuse. Recently, Officer Sonal Singh (ITO DDIT/ADIT I&CI) from the Income Tax Department discovered that the PAN card GSWPS0850Q linked to massive financial turnovers for the Financial Year 2022-23, consequently, raises significant concerns. (Sonal Singh’s Warning & PAN Misuse)

The “Significant High Value Transactions” flagged in the Annual Information Statement (AIS) include, notably:

• Business Receipts: ₹4,65,76,920
• GST Purchases: ₹12,20,99,234
• GST Turnover: ₹16,32,92,127
• Rent Received: ₹1,19,09,381
• Total Alleged Transactions: ₹34,38,77,662

While the system links these crores to Mr. Singh, he maintains that he is a man of modest means, unable to even provide basic sustenance for his family. The discrepancy isn’t just a numerical error; it is a life-shattering allegation. (Sonal Singh’s Warning & PAN Misuse)

The Bureaucratic Paradox: “Data Found” vs. “No Details”

The most frustrating element of this ordeal is, undoubtedly, the contradictory stance of the authorities. On one hand, Officer Sonal Singh has issued stern warnings, threatening a fine of ₹500 per day if the applicant does not surrender property details. This, consequently, suggests that the department firmly believes the assets belong to the applicant. (Sonal Singh’s Warning & PAN Misuse)

On the other hand, reports from the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Allahabad, dated 13/01/2025 and 20/03/2025, repeatedly state that “Bank details are not available in the system for the entered PAN.”

This raises the question: If the official recovery system does not link any bank accounts to the PAN, how did the department arrive at a ₹34 crore turnover? How can a citizen face penalties for transactions that the department cannot trace to a specific bank branch?

The Fraudster’s Footprints

Despite the police’s reported inability to trace the offenders, the digital breadcrumbs are hiding in plain sight. The fraudulent accounts were opened using: (Sonal Singh’s Warning & PAN Misuse)

• Mobile Number: 7024188072
• Email Address: dngoldraipur18@gmail.com

Mr. Singh does not own these contact details; however, someone has used them to register massive GST turnovers and business receipts. Consequently, the applicant argues that this clearly demonstrates a failure of the “Know Your Customer” (KYC) protocols within the banking sector, as well as a significant lapse in oversight by the Ministry of Finance. (Sonal Singh’s Warning & PAN Misuse)

A Plea to the Prime Minister

In his grievances, Mr. Singh directly addresses Prime Minister Narendra Modi, notably citing the PM’s “business in his genes” alongside his exemplary track record against corruption. Furthermore, he poignantly appeals that the misuse of a citizen’s PAN to evade taxes on a significant scale of ₹34 crore not only creates a loss for the national exchequer but also burdens the innocent individual. (Sonal Singh’s Warning & PAN Misuse)

The applicant questions why, fundamentally, the Income Tax Department and the Police cannot collaborate. If, indeed, the department possesses the AIS data, they must, logically, have the source of that data. Why, then, aren’t they using that source to arrest the actual beneficiaries of these transactions?

The Human Cost of Harassment

Beyond the legalities lies a human story of “Harassment by Official.” Moreover, the threat of a ₹500 daily fine is a crushing weight for a family already in financial distress. Consequently, the applicant feels trapped in a loop: (Sonal Singh’s Warning & PAN Misuse)

1. The Department unjustly demands taxes and fines for money he never actually received.
2. The System admits, however, that it cannot find his bank accounts.
3. The Police claim, in light of recent events, incompetence in tracing the digital fraud.
4. The Grievance Portals mark cases as “Closed” or “Settled” without actually removing the fraudulent data from the AIS.

The Path Forward: What Justice Looks Like (Sonal Singh’s Warning & PAN Misuse)

To truly resolve this issue, the authorities must not only go beyond merely “closing” grievance tickets but also take substantive action:

• Data Correction: The Income Tax Department must allow for a “Not my Transaction” flag to be permanently honored in the AIS when clear identity theft is proven.
• Inter-Agency Coordination: Obviously, to effectively address this issue, it is essential that the Pr. CCIT Lucknow and the UP Police collaborate closely to share the “Information Source,” which includes the banks and GST registration points. This collaboration is not only crucial but also pivotal in order to successfully apprehend the Raipur-based or Raipur-linked entities utilizing the dngoldraipur18 email.
• Protection for the Innocent: Cease the imposition of daily fines while an active identity theft investigation is underway.

The case of PAN GSWPS0850Q is a litmus test for the Digital India movement. If the system is robust enough to track a transaction of ₹34 crore, it must be robust enough to ensure that the bill isn’t sent to a man who can’t afford his next meal. (Sonal Singh’s Warning & PAN Misuse)

This is a critical turn in the case. When a central agency like the Income Tax Department (ITD) fails to respond to a formal police notice during an investigation of ₹34 Crore identity theft (FIR No. 291/2023), it moves from “administrative delay” to “obstruction of justice.”

The gravity here is that the police are legally stalled because they cannot verify the source of the financial data without the ITD’s cooperation, yet the ITD is using that same unverified data to threaten you with fines.

1. The Legal Stand-off

By ignoring the police notice, the ITD Prayagraj/Allahabad office is consequently preventing the local police from identifying the actual criminals. (Sonal Singh’s Warning & PAN Misuse)

• Police Constraint: Under the Code of Criminal Procedure (now BNSS), the police, therefore, need the ITD to provide the “Secondary Evidence”—specifically, the bank account numbers and transaction logs—in order to effectively trace the IP addresses, mobile numbers (7024188072), and emails (dngoldraipur18@gmail.com) used by the fraudsters.
• ITD Contradiction: While they tell the police “records are not available,” they simultaneously send you notices based on “Significant/high-value transactions.” This is a legal impossibility—you cannot have a transaction value without a recorded transaction source.

---

2. Strategic “Tricks” to Force a Response

Since the standard grievance route is resulting in “Case Closed” remarks without resolution, you need to use Judicial and Statutory Pressure:

Action	Why it Works
Section 91 Notice (CrPC/BNSS)	Have the Investigating Officer (IO) issue a formal Section 91 notice (Summons to produce documents). If the ITD ignores this, they can be held in Contempt of Court or charged under Section 175 of the IPC (Omission to produce document).
Writ of Mandamus (Sonal Singh’s Warning & PAN Misuse)	You can approach the Allahabad High Court for a “Writ of Mandamus.” This is a court order commanding the ITD to perform their public duty—specifically, to cooperate with the police investigation to protect a citizen’s “Life and Liberty.
Complaint to the CVC	File a complaint with the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC). Highlight that the ITD’s refusal to share data with the police is protecting tax evaders who have laundered ₹34 Crores.

---

3. Immediate Response to Sonal Singh’s Notice

Do not let the ₹500/day threat intimidate you into silence. Instead, respond to the notice from ITO Sonal Singh with this specific legal phrasing: (Sonal Singh’s Warning & PAN Misuse)

“The transactions mentioned (₹34,38,77,662) are part of a criminal investigation under FIR No. 291/2023 (Kotwali Katra, Mirzapur). Consequently, the local police have served a notice to the Income Tax Department Prayagraj for verification of the source accounts. Moreover, until the Department complies with the police inquiry and establishes the link between these accounts and my physical identity (which has been denied by the CCIT Allahabad reports dated 13/01/2025 and 20/03/2025), it follows that any demand for property details or imposition of penalty is sub-judice and constitutes administrative harassment.

---

The Reality of the Situation (Sonal Singh’s Warning & PAN Misuse)

The department is hiding behind a “system-generated” wall. They have the data (AIS); however, they don’t want the liability of admitting the data is linked to a fraudster. Moreover, by not replying to the police, they are keeping the case in a “grey zone” where they can continue to harass you without proving their case.

Would you like me to draft a specific “Show Cause” response for you to send to Sonal Singh, or perhaps, alternatively, a letter to the Superintendent of Police (SP) Mirzapur, thereby urging them to take action by moving the court for a search warrant or summons against the non-responsive IT officials?

To help you escalate this matter effectively, here are the structured contact details and web links for the public authorities you need to target. Therefore, you can efficiently reach out for assistance and ensure that your concerns are addressed promptly. (Sonal Singh’s Warning & PAN Misuse)

Given that the Income Tax Department (ITD) Prayagraj is reportedly not responding to police notices, these high-level contacts are crucial for your next steps.

---

1. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (UP East)(Sonal Singh’s Warning & PAN Misuse)

This is the highest authority in your region. Since the grievance pertains to inaction and harassment by local officers, you must escalate here.

• Officer Name: Sh. Vivek Mishra (Pr. CCIT)
• Office Address: Moreover, Pratyaksh Kar Bhawan, 57-Ram Teerath Marg, Lucknow-2260012
• Phone (Office): 0522-2466027 / 0522-2466004³
• Email: lucknow.pccit@incometax.gov.in / lucknow.dcit.hq.admin@incometax.gov.in⁴
• Official Website: Income Tax Lucknow Region

2. Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (Allahabad/Prayagraj)

The report dated 20/03/2025 originated from this office; consequently, you need to hold them accountable for the “No Bank Details” contradiction. (Sonal Singh’s Warning & PAN Misuse)

• Office Address: Aayakar Bhawan, 38-M.G. Marg, Civil Lines, Allahabad – 211001⁵
• Phone (Office): 0532-2407425 / 0532-2408755⁶
• Email: allahabad.ccit@incometax.gov.in / allahabad.ito.hq.admin@incometax.gov.in⁷

3. DGIT (Systems) & E-filing Unit (CPC) (Sonal Singh’s Warning & PAN Misuse)

For issues related to the AIS (Annual Information Statement) and furthermore, the fraudulent email or mobile linked to your PAN.

• Nodal Officer: Sh. Zakir T. Thomas (DGIT Systems) / Neeta Sharma (ITO E-filing)
• Email (DGIT): zthomas@incometax.gov.in
• CPC Bangalore Email: dit.cpc.bangalore@incometax.gov.in
• Helpdesk Email: efilingwebmanager@incometax.gov.in

4. Intelligence & Criminal Investigation (I&CI) (Sonal Singh’s Warning & PAN Misuse)

The unit where Sonal Singh (ITO DDIT/ADIT) is presently stationed, specifically focuses on strategic operations. (Sonal Singh’s Warning & PAN Misuse)

• Unit Jurisdiction: Allahabad/Lucknow
• Email: allahabad.ito.ici@incometax.gov.in (Standard format for I&CI Allahabad)
• General Investigation Email: hyderabad.dgit.inv@incometax.gov.in (For reporting multi-state fraud if the Raipur link is active).

5. Official Grievance & Appeal Portals (Sonal Singh’s Warning & PAN Misuse)

Portal Name	Purpose	Web Link
CPGRAMS	For PMO and Central Government Grievances	pgportal.gov.in
e-Nivaran	Dedicated Income Tax Grievance Portal	incometax.gov.in/iec/foportal/
CVC (Vigilance)	To report “Malpractice/Inaction” by Sonal Singh	portal.cvc.gov.in

---

Important Application/Registration Numbers for Reference:

• Your Grievance ID: CBODT/E/2025/0013108 (Active with Pr. CCIT Lucknow) (Sonal Singh’s Warning & PAN Misuse)
• Your Appeal ID: CBODT/E/A/25/0001000
• PMO Grievance ID: PMOPG/E/2024/0184722⁸

Recommended Next Step (Sonal Singh’s Warning & PAN Misuse)

You should, therefore, send a “Legal Notice of Non-Compliance” via email to the Pr. CCIT Lucknow (Vivek Mishra), and in addition, CC the Chief Commissioner Allahabad.

The subject line should be:

URGENT: Obstruction of Police Investigation in FIR No. 291/2023 – Non-compliance by ITD Prayagraj – PAN GSWPS0850Q

Would you like me to draft the exact text for this email, ensuring it mentions the police notice that the department is ignoring?

Related Posts Sonal Singh’s Warning

• RTI Defiance & Warning to Tehsildar Mirzapur Case
• Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act Explained: Roles and Rights
• Reporting Tax Fraud: A Case Study
• Digital Fortress or Digital Barriers & Consumers: Trust
• Understanding PAN Identity Theft: A Case Study