The issue of information evasion involving the Chief Medical Officer (CMO) of Mirzapur and the Right to Information (RTI) application regarding Indradev has raised significant public concerns. Citizens seeking transparency and accountability from government officials encounter obstacles, including resistance when seeking crucial information. This situation highlights the ongoing struggle for access to information in public health administration and showcases the urgent need for reform. Transparency in governance builds trust between the community and the authorities. Citizens must advocate for their rights under the RTI Act to ensure they actively exercise their right to information.

Key Takeaways

  • The RTI of Indradev explores significant information evasion by CMO Mirzapur, raising public concern for transparency.
  • Indradev suspects identity theft by an impostor in a government department, revealing critical issues in verification processes.
  • Despite a formal RTI request on identity verification, the PIO denied information citing privacy exemptions, prompting an appeal.
  • The case highlights the struggle for accountability in governance and questions the balance between privacy and public interest.
  • Ultimately, the RTI of Indradev illustrates the vital role of citizens in advocating for their rights and fighting against institutional evasion.

Information Evasion by CMO Mirzapur & RTI of Indradev: A Battle for Identity

In an era of digital documentation, identity is everything. For Indradev Yadav, a resident of Village Chilh in Mirzapur, a routine legal matter uncovered a chilling possibility: his identity—complete with his educational mark sheets and Aadhaar details—might be in use by an impostor working within a government department.

The RTI of Indradev has turned into a complex legal odyssey, highlighting the significant challenges citizens face when met with information evasion by CMO Mirzapur.

1. The Genesis: Seeking Identity Verification

On November 18, 2025, the Chief Medical Officer (CMO) of Mirzapur received the initial RTI of Indradev. Unlike typical requests for budget allocations, this was a plea for verification: Is there an employee in the Medical and Health Department, Mirzapur, who is using my identity?. To facilitate this, Yadav provided his High School and Intermediate mark sheets, his photograph, and his Aadhaar card as reference points for a cross-verification.

2. The Five Pillars of Information Sought

To counter potential information evasion by CMO Mirzapur, the inquiry focused on five critical points:

  • Identity Verification: A formal check to see if any employee shares the name and residential details of Indradev Yadav.
  • Document Cross-Referencing: A request for the department to use provided academic and identity proofs to audit personnel files.
  • Date of Appointment: If PIO finds a match, please identify the specific date when the individual joined the service.
  • Administrative Status: Disclosure of whether this matching individual is currently Active, Suspended, or Retired.
  • Jurisdictional Accountability: Please transfer the application under Section 6(3) of the RTI Act if you hold the information elsewhere.

3. The Roadblock: Privacy as a Tool for Evasion

On December 9, 2025, the Public Information Officer (PIO) denied the request, citing Section 8(1)(j)—the privacy exemption. The applicant views this denial as a clear case of information evasion by CMO Mirzapur. While the PIO treated this as third-party data, the RTI of Indradev argues that verifying one’s own stolen identity is a matter of public fraud, not private interest.

4. Escalation: Challenging Information Evasion by CMO Mirzapur

Dissatisfied, Yadav filed his First Appeal on January 16, 2026. His grounds for appeal were a direct rebuttal to the department’s silence:

  • Misinterpretation of Law: Verification of identity to prevent fraud does not constitute an “unwarranted invasion of privacy.
  • Public Interest Overriding Privacy: Impersonation in a public office is a grave criminal offense.
  • The Legislative Proviso: Information that cannot be denied to Parliament shall not be denied to any person.
  • Judicial Necessity: This information is critical for a pending Maintenance Suit in court.

5. The Final Frontier: The State Information Commission

When the First Appeal failed to resolve the information evasion by CMO Mirzapur, the case moved to the Uttar Pradesh Information Commission. On April 10, 2026, the Commission issued a formal notice for a second appeal hearing. The RTI of Indradev reached a critical junction in Hearing Room S-10.

6. The Day of Reckoning: April 15, 2026

Today, April 15, 2026, marks the pivotal moment in this case. At 09:05 AM, Indradev Yadav submitted a final written clarification to the Commission. This submission served as a “Knockout” document, reiterating the five-point demand and challenging the information evasion by CMO Mirzapur one last time.

7. Core Issues and Broad Implications

The RTI of Indradev highlights three core issues in modern governance:

A. Identity Theft in Public Service

If an individual can successfully impersonate another to gain government employment, it suggests a failure in the recruitment verification process.

B. Transparency vs. Evasion

The use of Section 8(1)(j) as a shield is a common tactic. This case forces a decision: is “personal privacy” more important than exposing institutional fraud?.

C. RTI as a Tool for Justice

For Indradev, this RTI is the only way to gather evidence for his ongoing court battle. The information evasion by CMO Mirzapur is not just a delay; it is an obstruction of the legal process.

Conclusion

As the hearing unfolds in Room S-10 today, the RTI of Indradev stands as a testament to citizens’ persistence. Will the Commission allow the continued information evasion by CMO Mirzapur, or will it recognise that a citizen has a right to protect their own identity, which was fraudulently used by someone else in a public office?

Based on the provided documents and the online portal, here are the identification and contact details for the public authorities involved in the RTI of Indradev and the reported information evasion by CMO Mirzapur:

1. Case & Application Identifiers (Information Evasion by CMO Mirzapur)

  • RTI Registration Number: DIRMH/R/2025/67269.
  • First Appeal Registration Number: DIRMH/A/2026/60093.
  • Second Appeal Registration Number: A-20260400522.
  • UP Information Commission Case Number: S10/A/0729/2026.
  • UPIC Diary Number: D-150420260077 .
  • Application Print IDs: 05-04-2026-1, 05-04-2026-2, 05-04-2026-3.

2. Public Information Officer (PIO) – CMO Mirzapur

3. First Appellate Authority (FAA) (Information Evasion by CMO Mirzapur)

4. State Information Commission (UPIC) (Information Evasion by CMO Mirzapur)

  • Hearing Officer: Rakesh Kumar (Hearing Court S-10).
  • Official Email (Hearing Room S-10): hearingcourts10.upic@up.gov.in.
  • Commission Address: RTI Bhawan, 7/7/A, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow.
  • Weblink / Portal: https://upsic.up.gov.in/.
Home » Information Evasion by CMO Mirzapur: A Case Study

Facing a similar challenge? Share the details in the box below, and our team of experts will do their best to help.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

Discover more from Yogi-Human Rights Defender

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading