Introduction: Information Evasion by CMO Mirzapur

Recently, a major issue arose involving systemic information evasion by CMO Mirzapur. Specifically, this involved an RTI request from Indradev about missing information. People who seek clear facts from officials often face obstacles. For instance, they encounter resistance when asking for key details. Consequently, this case shows the ongoing battle for public health facts. It also highlights the clear need for reform. Furthermore, transparency in governance naturally builds trust between the community and leaders. Therefore, citizens must stand up for their rights under the RTI Act to ensure they get the facts they need.

Key Takeaways

• First, the RTI from Indradev exposes key related documentation, raising public worry over openness.
• Furthermore, Indradev fears an impostor stole their identity in a local office. This reveals major issues in verification processes.
• However, despite a formal request for identity checks, the PIO denied information using privacy rules, leading to an appeal.
• As a result, this fight against information evasion by CMO Mirzapur shows the hard push for accountability in governance. It also questions the balance between privacy and public good.
• Ultimately, Indradev’s RTI proves how essential citizens are in demanding their rights and fighting official delays caused by information evasion by CMO Mirzapur.

Information Evasion by CMO Mirzapur & RTI of Indradev: A Battle for Identity

Today, in an era of digital records, identity is critical. For instance, Indradev Yadav lives in Village Chilh in Mirzapur. Recently, a routine legal issue revealed a scary truth. Someone else might be using their identity—along with their marksheet and Aadhaar details—inside a government office.

As a result, Indradev’s RTI became a tough legal fight. Indeed, it shows the big hurdles citizens face when hit with this source.

1. The Genesis: Seeking Identity Verification

Specifically, on November 18, 2025, the Chief Medical Officer (CMO) of Mirzapur got the first RTI from Indradev. This was no ordinary request for budget money. Instead, it was a direct call for a check: Is there an employee in the Medical and Health Department, Mirzapur, who is using my identity? To help with this, Yadav shared high school marksheets, photos, and an Aadhaar card as proof to run a cross-check.

2. The Five Pillars of Information Sought

In order to fight ongoing information evasion by CMO Mirzapur, the request targeted five clear points:

• Identity Verification: A clear check to see if any worker shares the same name and address as Indradev Yadav.
• Document Cross-Referencing: A direct ask for the office to use supplied school and ID proofs to review staff files.
• Date of Appointment: If the PIO finds a matching match, please state the exact day they joined.
• Administrative Status: Additionally, state if this matching worker is currently Active, Suspended, or Retired.
• Jurisdictional Accountability: Please send the request over under Section 6(3) of the RTI Act if the records sit elsewhere.

3. The Roadblock: Privacy as a Tool for Evasion

However, on December 9, 2025, the Public Information Officer (PIO) rejected the request. They cited Section 8(1)(j)—the privacy rule. Consequently, the applicant sees this rejection as clear information evasion by CMO Mirzapur. Indeed, while the PIO treated this as private third-party data, the RTI of Indradev proves that checking one’s own stolen identity stops public fraud. Therefore, it is not just a private matter.

4. Escalation: Challenging Information Evasion by CMO Mirzapur

Dissatisfied, Yadav filed a First Appeal on January 16, 2026. Ultimately, their grounds for appeal directly challenged the department’s silence:

• Misinterpretation of Law: Verification of identity to stop fraud is not an unlawful invasion of privacy.
• Public Interest Overriding Privacy: In fact, impersonation in a public office is a grave criminal offense.
• The Legislative Proviso: Information that cannot be denied to Parliament must not be kept from any citizen.
• Judicial Necessity: Furthermore, these details are crucial for an active Maintenance Suit in court.

5. The Final Frontier: The State Information Commission

When the First Appeal failed to resolve the information evasion by CMO Mirzapur, the case moved up to the Uttar Pradesh Information Commission. Subsequently, on April 10, 2026, the Commission sent a formal notice for a second appeal hearing. Thus, the RTI of Indradev reached a major turning point in Hearing Room S-10.

6. The Day of Reckoning: April 15, 2026

Today, April 15, 2026, marks the key moment in this fight. Specifically, at 09:05 AM, Indradev Yadav sent a final note to the Commission. Consequently, this update acted as a vital document. It restated the five key tasks and challenged the information evasion by CMO Mirzapur one final time.

7. Core Issues and Broad Implications

In summary, the RTI of Indradev highlights three core issues in modern public service:

A. Identity Theft in Public Service

First, if someone can pretend to be another person to get a job, it shows a major fault in the recruitment verification process.

B. Transparency vs. Evasion

Indeed, using Section 8(1)(j) as a shield is a common tactic. Ultimately, this case forces a choice: is personal privacy more important than stopping public fraud?

C. RTI as a Tool for Justice

Finally, for Indradev, this RTI is the only way to gather evidence for their ongoing court battle. The information evasion by CMO Mirzapur is not just a delay; it is an active roadblock to justice.

Conclusion

As the hearing starts in Room S-10 today, the RTI of Indradev stands as a testament to citizen effort. Ultimately, will the Commission allow the continued information evasion by CMO Mirzapur? Or will it agree that citizens have a right to protect their own identity when it was fraudulently used by someone else in a public office?

In addition, based on official records and the online portal, here are the main details for the offices involved in the RTI of Indradev and the reported information evasion by CMO Mirzapur:

1. Case & Application Identifiers (Information Evasion by CMO Mirzapur)

• RTI Registration Number: DIRMH/R/2025/67269.
• First Appeal Registration Number: DIRMH/A/2026/60093.
• Second Appeal Registration Number: A-20260400522.
• UP Information Commission Case Number: S10/A/0729/2026.
• UPIC Diary Number: D-150420260077 .
• Application Print IDs: 05-04-2026-1, 05-04-2026-2, 05-04-2026-3.

2. Public Information Officer (PIO) – CMO Mirzapur

• Authority: Chief Medical Officer (CMO), Medical and Health Department, Mirzapur.
• Mobile Number: 9454455171.
• Email Address: cmomzp@gmail.com.
• Office Address: Office – CMO, Medical and Health Department, Mirzapur District, PIN: 231001.

3. First Appellate Authority (FAA) (Information Evasion by CMO Mirzapur)

• Authority: Director Health / AD Mirzapur, Medical and Health Directorate, Uttar Pradesh.
• Mobile Number: 8005192626.
• Email Address: admhmzp1@gmail.com or dgmhsrti@gmail.com.
• Office Address: Medical and Health Department, Mirzapur District, PIN: 231001.

4. State Information Commission (UPIC) (Information Evasion by CMO Mirzapur)

• Hearing Officer: Rakesh Kumar (Hearing Court S-10).
• Official Email (Hearing Room S-10): hearingcourts10.upic@up.gov.in.
• Commission Address: RTI Bhawan, 7/7/A, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow.
• Weblink / Portal: https://upsic.up.gov.in/.

Related Posts: Information Evasion by CMO Mirzapur

• RTI Appeal at PIO Chief Minister Office: Indradev Yadav’s Case
• Second Appeal Under RTI Act: Indradev Yadav’s Case
• Indradev Yadav’s Appeal Against PIO’s Silence
• CMO Prayagraj Under Scrutiny for Misleading Reports
• Citizen’s Struggle for Transparency and Security in India