🚨 Justice Denied to Mahima Maurya: When Police Reports Ignore Grievous Injury and Count Matters More Than Quality

The pursuit of justice often requires victims to navigate layers of bureaucracy. The case about NCR No. 104/2024 (P.S. Vindhyachal, Mirzapur) highlights a deeply worrying practice and is a prime example of Justice Denied to Mahima Maurya. There is an obvious suppression of critical medical evidence. Additionally, there is an administrative focus on arbitrarily closing grievances rather than addressing their merits.

I. The Core Inconsistency: Grievous Hurt vs. Minor Charges (Justice Denied to Mahima Maurya)

The primary conflict in this case is a stark contradiction between verified facts and the final police report.

A. Suppressed Medical Evidence

The complainant, Mahima Maurya, has consistently alleged the injury involved a Thumb Fracture, which medically means Grievous Hurt.

• The case originated from a court order (CJM, Mirzapur, dated 09/06/2025) for investigation.
• Crucially, the matter was referred to a Medical Board (CMO, Mirzapur) on 29/08/2025. The board prepared a Final Report confirming the nature of the injury. This report should be conclusive evidence.

B. The Arbitrary Charge Sheet (Justice Denied to Mahima Maurya)

Despite the known evidence and the Medical Board’s findings, the Investigating Officer (S.I. Raghavendra Rai) filed a Charge Sheet (No. nil/2025 dated 24.10.2025) only under minor sections (115(2)/352 BNS).

• This action signals a deliberate omission. It suppresses the evidence that would require filing charges under a graver section corresponding to Grievous Hurt.
• The police failed to include the Medical Board Report in the court filing. This suggests an intent to prejudice the case. The accused are close relatives of the victim’s husband. (Justice Denied to Mahima Maurya)

II. The Failure of the Grievance Redressal System (Justice Denied to Mahima Maurya)

The official response to the grievance (Reference: GOVUP/E/2025/0133877) reveals a systemic failure. The focus is on quantity (disposal) rather than quality (resolution).

A. Evasive Disposal and Transfer of Burden

The final action taken report was issued by the Senior Superintendent of Police, Mirzapur. It was signed off by the Additional Superintendent of Police, City. The complaint was closed on 08/12/2025. (Justice Denied to Mahima Maurya)

• The report merely confirms that a Charge Sheet under minor sections has been filed.
• It completely ignores the central allegation about the suppressed Medical Board Report and the missing original evidence.
• The police did not initiate an inquiry into the evidence suppression. Instead, they advised the applicant to seek relief by filing a complaint with the Hon’ble Court. This is a procedural maneuver. It shifts the burden of correcting the police’s intentional omission from the police administration to the victim.

B. The Focus on Application Count

The police report further lists 30 previous applications filed by the complainant over the period. This period is from October 2024 to May 2025.

The system seems to view the number of applications as a measure of annoyance. It fails to recognize them as cries for unmet justice.

The victim filed a sheer volume of repeated applications. This should have triggered a thorough, high-level review. The purpose would be to understand why the first investigations and disposals were continuously deemed unsatisfactory. Instead of this, listing the count implicitly categorizes the complainant as a “vexatious litigant.” It also conveniently overlooks the failure to handle the core evidence in any of the prior disposals.

III. Next Steps: Compelling the Truth (Justice Denied to Mahima Maurya)

To break this cycle of arbitrary disposal, the complainant must take action. They need to bypass the police administration. Instead, they should directly invoke the power of the judiciary.

1. RTI for Documentation (SPMZR/R/2025/60346): By filing the RTI, the complainant enforces the police to produce the suppressed documents. These include the Medical Board Report and the full Charge Sheet file. This must be done within 30 days.
2. Judicial Intervention: Concurrently, an application must be filed before the Hon’ble Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM), Mirzapur. This application must explicitly use the power granted under Section 173(8) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) (corresponding to the former CrPC section) to:
   • Inform the court that crucial evidence of Grievous Hurt has been willfully withheld.
   • Compel the Investigating Officer to conduct a Further Investigation. They must file a Supplementary Charge Sheet promptly. This should incorporate the Medical Board’s findings.

This legal recourse serves as the final path to present the facts. Medical evidence supports these facts, and we submit them to the court to frame appropriate charges. This process is crucial for achieving true justice.

---

Would you now like assistance? We can draft the crucial Application to the Hon’ble Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) under Section 173(8) BNSS. (Justice Denied to Mahima Maurya)

That is a very good and practical demand. Having the official contact details for the PIO will be essential for your follow-up. These details will also be vital for the appeal process and further communication.

Here are the contact details for the Mirzapur Police. Additionally, you will find the relevant grievance and RTI portals. This information is based on what you provided in your RTI filing and grievance documents.

📞 Contact Details for RTI and Grievance Follow-up

1. Public Information Officer (PIO) / Nodal Officer (Mirzapur Police)

This is the officer directly responsible for processing your RTI application (Registration No: SPMZR/R/2025/60346). (Justice Denied to Mahima Maurya)

Detail	Information
PIO Name	Shri Manish Kumar Mishra
Designation	ASP (OPERATION) / Nodal Officer
Mobile Number	7007941679
Email Address	aspopmzp$$at$$gmail$$dot$$com (or) addlspopmzr$$at$$gmail$$dot$$com
Public Authority	SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE MIRZAPUR

Note: When sending an email, replace

$$at$$

with @ and

$$dot$$

with .

2. Higher Authority for Grievance (DGP Office/Secretariat) (Justice Denied to Mahima Maurya)

This is the office that processed the high-level grievance (GOVUP/E/2025/0133877) through the Chief Minister’s Office.

Detail	Information
Officer Concerned	Shri Arvind Mohan (Joint Secretary)
Organization	Government of Uttar Pradesh (Chief Minister Secretariat)
Contact Number	0522-2226350 (Office)
Email Address	arvind.12574$$at$$gov$$dot$$in

---

🌐 Relevant Web Links (For Status Check and Appeals)

Portal/Authority	Purpose	Link/Reference
RTI Portal (Online Filing & Status)	To check the official status of your RTI (SPMZR/R/2025/60346) and file the First Appeal if needed.	https://rtionline.gov.in/ (or the specific UP State RTI portal if submitted offline)
IGRS/CM Helpline Portal (Justice Denied to Mahima Maurya)	To check the final status and download the closing report for your administrative grievances (Ref. No. 60000250275283).	http://jansunwai.up.nic.in/
Uttar Pradesh Police (Official Site)	General information and official contacts for Mirzapur Police.	https://uppolice.gov.in/ (Navigate to District Mirzapur)

---

Justice Denied to Mahima Maurya

Would you like me to draft the Application to the Hon’ble Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM)? This is for filing a Supplementary Charge Sheet under Section 173(8) BNSS.

You are absolutely right. The filing of the RTI and the subsequent court application can happen concurrently. However, the most effective Supplementary Charge Sheet application will rely heavily on the documents you requested via RTI. This includes the Medical Board Report. Without those documents, your court application might lack the necessary prima facie evidence of suppression.

Given the status of your case, you need to act immediately on the judicial front. The next best step is to file a court application. This application forces the IO to produce the missing evidence, whether you have it yet or not. People often refer to this as a Protest Petition. They also call it an Application under Section 173(8) BNSS for Further Investigation. It cites the suppressed evidence.

Here is the draft for a robust Application to the Hon’ble Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) which serves to:

1. Challenge the police’s minor charge sheet.
2. Inform the Court about the suppressed Grievous Hurt evidence (Medical Board Report).
3. Request the Court to compel the IO to file a Supplementary Report.

This application uses the legal reference Section 173(8) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). This section allows for ‘Further Investigation’ after a report has been filed.

---

🏛️ Application for Further Investigation (Section 173(8) BNSS)

BEFORE THE HON’BLE COURT OF CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (CJM), MIRZAPUR (Justice Denied to Mahima Maurya)

Case No.: [Insert Case Number if assigned by the Court]

In Re: NCR No. 104/2024, P.S. Vindhyachal (Sections 115(2)/352 BNS)

Applicant/Complainant: Smt. Mahima Maurya

W/o Pramod Kumar, R/o Godsar Sarpati, P.S. Vindhyachal, District Mirzapur

Versus

Accused:

1. Manoj Kumar Kushwaha
2. Shubham Kushwaha

APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 173(8) OF THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 (BNSS) READ WITH SECTION 156(3) BNSS, PRAYING FOR DIRECTION TO THE INVESTIGATING OFFICER TO CONDUCT FURTHER INVESTIGATION AND FILE A SUPPLEMENTARY CHARGE SHEET

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH: (Justice Denied to Mahima Maurya)

1. The Applicant is the victim and complainant in the aforementioned case. The case was registered pursuant to the Hon’ble Court’s order dated 09/06/2025.
2. That the Investigating Officer (IO), S.I. Raghavendra Rai, P.S. Vindhyachal, has submitted a Charge Sheet (No. nil/2025 dated 24.10.2025) before this Hon’ble Court only under the minor sections of 115(2)/352 BNS.
3. The said Charge Sheet is incomplete and illegal. It amounts to suppression of crucial evidence. This seriously prejudices the due course of justice.
4. SUPPRESSED EVIDENCE OF GRIEVOUS HURT: The Applicant submits that the initial medical evidence is from Tej Bahadur Sapru Hospital. This hospital is located in Prayagraj. This evidence confirms a Thumb Fracture. The Thumb Fracture forms Grievous Hurt. The IO has deliberately neglected to file charges appropriate to this injury.
5. EVIDENCE IN POLICE CUSTODY: The Medical Board (CMO, Mirzapur) received the matter through Letter No. Mu.C.Adhikari/Me.Bo./2025-26/607 dated 29.08.2025.The Applicant states that the IO, S.I. Raghavendra Rai, presented the original documents to the Medical Board. The Medical Board concluded its inquiry. It prepared a Final Report confirming the nature of the grievous injury.
6. Despite this conclusive evidence being available, it is within the knowledge and custody of the investigating agency. The IO has willfully excluded the Medical Board Report. The original medical documents are also missing from the Charge Sheet filed on 24.10.2025.
7. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Mirzapur, closed the Applicant’s administrative grievance (GOVUP/E/2025/0133877). However, the relevant authority did not address the specific issue of the suppressed Medical Board Report. This compels the Applicant to seek immediate judicial intervention.
8. The filing of a report under minor sections deliberately suppresses evidence of a graver offence. This action necessitates Further Investigation under Section 173(8) BNSS. We ensure that we present the complete truth before the Hon’ble Court before framing the charges.

PRAYER (Justice Denied to Mahima Maurya)

The Applicant respectfully requests that this Hon’ble Court grant the following:

a) Order Further Investigation: Direct the Senior Superintendent of Police, Mirzapur, to immediately compel the Investigating Officer (S.I. Raghavendra Rai or successor) to conduct further investigation in NCR No. 104/2024, P.S. Vindhyachal, under Section 173(8) BNSS.

b) Order Supplementary Report: Direct the IO to file a Supplementary Charge Sheet before this Hon’ble Court, specifically including:

* The Final Report/Opinion of the Medical Board, Mirzapur (Letter No. Mu.C.Adhikari/Me.Bo./2025-26/607).

* The Original Medical Treatment Documents (including X-Rays/Reports of the Thumb Fracture).

c) Pass any other and further orders as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the interest of justice.

AND FOR THIS ACT OF KINDNESS, THE APPLICANT SHALL EVER PRAY.

Place: Mirzapur

Date: 12/12/2025

(Signature of Applicant)

Mahima Maurya

---

📌 Instructions for Filing (Justice Denied to Mahima Maurya)

1. Consult Legal Counsel: You must file this application in the Hon’ble CJM Court through your Advocate. They will formalise the presentation and finish any necessary affidavits.
2. Reference BNSS: Make sure your Advocate uses the correct new legal references (BNSS, BNS) when filing in court. Always check that this is done where applicable. Both Section 173(8) CrPC and Section 173(8) BNSS serve the same purpose in this context.
3. Filing Date: File this application as soon as possible. Ideally, do this before the court takes cognizance. Complete it before the court proceeds with framing charges based on the incomplete Charge Sheet.