Obviously, Leave encashment is a hot topic of discussion about working of Nagar Nigam Prayagraj. Evidently, Leave encashment is a grant given to support dedicated staff to the service. Discretionary power should not culminate into tyranny and arbitrariness accordingly open gate of corruption resulting misuse of public fund.
Accountability in Public Funds: The Leave Encashment Dispute at Nagar Nigam Prayagraj
The administration of public funds requires not just efficiency, but absolute transparency. Recently, a significant RTI (Right to Information) request filed by Mr. Indradev Yadav has cast a spotlight on the Nagar Nigam (Municipal Corporation) Prayagraj, raising critical questions about how leave encashment is granted—especially to employees embroiled in legal controversies.
At the heart of this issue is a fundamental principle: discretionary power must never transform into arbitrary favor. When public money is disbursed as a benefit, the process must be governed by law, not by individual whim.
The Core Conflict: Transparency vs. Discretion
Leave encashment is traditionally viewed as a reward for dedicated service. However, the filing of RTI Application DIRLB/R/2025/60347 suggests concerns regarding the misuse of this benefit.
The applicant has specifically questioned the encashment process for two employees, Mr. Umesh Kumar Yadav and Mr. Mukesh Kumar Yadav, who are reportedly facing criminal proceedings. This brings a vital question to the forefront: Can an employee under judicial scrutiny still claim financial benefits from the state without a rigorous vetting process?
Key Information Sought Under RTI
The RTI request aims to peel back the layers of administrative decision-making by demanding:
- The Legal Framework: A certified copy of the rules governing leave encashment for staff attending court proceedings.
- Internal Communications: All memos, emails, and letters exchanged between the sanctioning officers and departmental heads regarding these specific approvals.
- The Paper Trail: Certified copies of the actual leave applications submitted by the individuals in question.
- Defining Responsibility: The official name and designation of the authority who holds the final power to approve these payments.
Why This Matters: The Risk of “Administrative Tyranny”
The applicant rightly points out that without clear oversight, discretionary powers can become a “gate of corruption.” If public funds are diverted to individuals under criminal cloud without a clear legal mandate, it undermines the morale of honest employees and erodes public trust in the Municipal Corporation.
“Discretionary power should not culminate into tyranny and arbitrariness… resulting in the misuse of public funds.” — Excerpt from the RTI Application.
Accountability Details
For those following this case, the key officials responsible for providing these answers are:
- PIO: Musir Ahmad (Apar Ngr Ayukt, Nagar Nigam Prayagraj)
- Nodal Officer: Alok Goel
Conclusion: A Test for the RTI Act
This case serves as a litmus test for the effectiveness of the RTI Act in Uttar Pradesh. Will the Nagar Nigam Prayagraj provide the requested certified documents within the 30-day mandate, or will the “gate of corruption” remain closed to public scrutiny?
Transparency is the only antidote to the misuse of power. As citizens, staying informed about such filings ensures that “public funds” remain exactly that—for the public.
In India, the granting of paid leave or leave encashment to a government employee facing a criminal case is governed by specific service rules (like the CCS Leave Rules or state-specific Municipal Corporation rules) and constitutional protections.
1. The Right to Leave vs. Employer Discretion
Under standard government service rules, leave cannot be claimed as a right.
- Public Interest: The competent authority has the power to refuse or revoke leave of any kind if they believe it is in the “public interest.”
- Court Attendance: If an employee is attending court as an accused, they must generally apply for Earned Leave (EL) or Casual Leave (CL). Unlike witnesses, who may be granted “Special Casual Leave” or treated as on duty, an accused person is usually required to use their own personal leave balance.
2. Leave Encashment and Pending Proceedings
The issue you raised regarding Mr. Umesh and Mr. Mukesh Kumar Yadav specifically involves Leave Encashment. There is a distinction between taking leave while working and encashing leave at the end of service or during employment:
- Vested Right: Courts (such as the Bombay and Karnataka High Courts) have ruled that leave encashment is a “vested right” akin to property under Article 300A of the Constitution. It cannot be taken away arbitrarily.
- Withholding Power: Despite it being a right, Rule 39(3) of the CCS (Leave) Rules (and similar state rules) allows the authority to withhold leave encashment if the employee is under suspension or if criminal proceedings are pending, especially if there is a possibility of money being recoverable from them after the trial.
3. Impact of Suspension or Custody
If the accused employees were arrested and spent more than 48 hours in custody, they are “deemed suspended” by law.
- During Suspension: Generally, leave cannot be granted to a government servant under suspension.
- Status of Leave: If they are not under suspension but are simply attending trial dates, they can use their accrued paid leave, provided the department approves the application.
4. The “Corruption” & “Arbitrariness” Argument
Your RTI highlights a critical administrative point: if the department is granting benefits (like encashment) to employees facing criminal charges without following the statutory “withholding” protocols, it may be seen as arbitrary use of power.
- If the criminal case involves financial loss to the government or moral turpitude, the department is legally expected to be more cautious before releasing funds.
Summary Table: Accused Employee Entitlements
| Benefit | General Status for Accused | Legal Ground |
| Paid Leave (EL/CL) | Admissible, but subject to approval. | Employer Discretion |
| Leave Encashment | Can be withheld until trial ends. | Rule 39(3) / State Service Rules |
| Special Casual Leave | Not allowed for an accused person. | Service Conduct Rules |
| Pension/Gratuity | Often withheld or paid as “Provisional.” | Pension Rules |
Indradev Yadav submitted second appeal against PIO Nagar Nigam Prayagraj regarding leave encashment issues
Based on your RTI application and the official records of the Nagar Nigam Prayagraj and the Directorate of Local Bodies (UP), here are the essential contact details and web links you need for follow-ups or appeals.
1. Primary Contact Details (Nagar Nigam Prayagraj)
This is the office where your RTI was filed. You can use these details to check the status of your request or send a formal reminder.
| Office / Person | Contact Number | Email Address |
| PIO: Musir Ahmad (Apar Nagar Ayukt) | 8303701004 | osnagarnigam@rediffmail.com |
| Nagar Ayukt (Municipal Commissioner) | 8189077826 | osnagarnigam@rediffmail.com |
| General Support / Helpline | 0532-2427221 | osnagarnigam@rediffmail.com |
2. Nodal Officer & Higher Authority (Directorate of Local Bodies)
Since your RTI registration number (DIRLB/R/2025/60347) is linked to the Directorate, these are the officials overseeing the process from the state level.
- Nodal Officer: Mr. Alok Goel (Senior Administrative Officer)
- Mobile: 8574190717
- Directorate Email: diruplb@nic.in / diruplb2012@gmail.com
- Phone (Lucknow Office): 0522-2838110
3. Essential Web Links
| Purpose | Official Web Link |
| Nagar Nigam Prayagraj Official Website | https://www.allahabadmc.gov.in/ |
| UP RTI Online Portal (To check status/Appeal) | https://rtionline.up.gov.in/ |
| Jansunwai (IGRS) Grievance Portal | http://jansunwai.up.nic.in |
| Directorate of Local Bodies (UP) | https://localbodies.up.nic.in/ |
Suggested Next Step
Since you filed the RTI on September 12, 2025, the 30-day statutory period ends on October 12, 2025.
If you do not receive a satisfactory response by then, the law allows you to file a First Appeal with the First Appellate Authority (usually the Municipal Commissioner or a higher directorate official).
Indradev Yadav is seeking posting details of staff from Apar Nagar Ayukt
Facing a similar challenge? Share the details in the box below, and our team of experts will do their best to help.