This DPRO Bhadohi & RTI application case illustrates the intricate journey of a deemed refusal as it navigates through the various levels of the appeals process outlined by the RTI Act. Initially, an applicant who feels aggrieved by a lack of response from a public authority can file a First Appeal, seeking a review of the decision or lack thereof. If the First Appeal does not yield satisfactory results, the applicant has the option to escalate the matter by filing a Second Appeal, which involves presenting their case to a higher authority. Additionally, there are provisions for imposing penalties on officials who fail to comply with the timelines set forth under the RTI Act, thereby ensuring accountability and transparency in public service.

🚨 DPRO Bhadohi & RTI Application: Final Proceedings on an Unanswered Request (DIRPR/R/2025/61901)

This DPRO Bhadohi & RTI application case centers on a simple but important question: what happens when a public office stays silent? The Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005 requires public authorities to answer requests within a strict timeframe. However, the Public Information Officer (PIO) and Nodal Officer did not entertain RTI application DIRPR/R/2025/61901 within the stipulated 30 days. Fortunately, the law provides a clear escalation path for exactly this situation. In other words, silence from a public authority isn’t the end of the road. Instead, it simply starts a structured legal process, much like the one we outlined in How to File an RTI Appeal Effectively.

Therefore, this post walks through the DPRO Bhadohi & RTI application timeline step by step, outlining what the applicant, Mr. Devi Prasad Gupta, must now do under the statutory appeal process. It also explains why each stage matters, who holds responsibility at each level, and what penalties officers may ultimately face. For context on how badly this pattern repeats across the state, see our earlier piece on RTI Rejection: Issues in Uttar Pradesh’s Information Commission.

---

1. 🛑 Timeline Violation and Failure to Entertain the RTI Application

To begin with, the applicant filed the RTI application on 29/07/2025. Under Section 7(1) of the RTI Act, the PIO had to furnish the information, or issue a rejection, within 30 days of filing.

• Deadline for Response: Approximately 28/08/2025.

Consequently, once that deadline passes without a satisfactory reply from the PIO or the Nodal Officer, the law treats this as a deemed refusal. This deemed refusal, in turn, triggers the appeal process automatically. Put simply, the applicant gains the right to escalate the moment the 30-day window closes, regardless of whether the office issued a formal rejection. As a result, applicants need not wait indefinitely. Instead, they can act immediately once the deadline lapses, a pattern we’ve also documented in Failing PIO in Office of SSP Mirzapur: RTI Case Analysis.

2. 📝 DPRO Bhadohi & RTI Application: Filing the First Appeal (Section 19(1))

Because of this deemed refusal, the next stage in this DPRO Bhadohi & RTI application dispute is the First Appeal to the designated First Appellate Authority (FAA). Indeed, this appeal gives the applicant their first formal chance to hold the office accountable.

Details of the First Appeal:

• Who to File To: The First Appellate Authority (FAA). This officer typically outranks the PIO within the Panchayati Raj Directorate.
• Deadline: The applicant must file within 30 days of the date the information fell due (i.e., 30 days after 28/08/2025), or from the date they received a decision.
• Contents: Specifically, the appeal must clearly state:
  • The Registration Number (DIRPR/R/2025/61901).
  • The details of the information sought (the five points).
  • The date of filing the original RTI.
  • The fact that the PIO (DPRO, Bhadohi) failed to provide any information or decision within the statutory time limit.

Moreover, a well-drafted First Appeal should cover each of these elements clearly. A vague or incomplete appeal can delay the process even further. For that reason, applicants should keep a copy of the original application, along with proof of filing, on hand throughout this stage. Our guide on Strategies for Successful RTI Appeals covers this in more depth.

3. ⚖️ DPRO Bhadohi & RTI Application: The Second Appeal (Section 19(3))

Sometimes, though, the FAA also fails to act. If the FAA does not decide the First Appeal within 30 days — or 45 days, if it extends the deadline in writing — the applicant must then file a Second Appeal. This step acts as a safeguard. It ensures that inaction at the first level doesn’t permanently deny the applicant their right to information, a scenario explored further in Second Appeal Under RTI Act: Kiran Singh’s Case.

Details of the Second Appeal:

• Who to File To: The State Information Commission (SIC) of Uttar Pradesh.
• Grounds: Either the FAA’s failure to pass an order, or dissatisfaction with the order it did pass.
• Importance: Notably, this stage matters most, because only the SIC can impose penalties on defaulting officers. Neither the PIO nor the FAA holds that power.

Furthermore, because the SIC operates at the state level, its orders carry significantly more weight than earlier ones in the process. Thus, many applicants see the Second Appeal as the point where real accountability finally begins.

4. 💰 Seeking Penalty and Compensation

Beyond simply seeking the information, the applicant can also ask the SIC to take strict action against the defaulting PIO once the case reaches that level, similar to the outcome we covered in Demanding Transparency: RTI Application for Police Action in Prayagraj.

• Penalty Clause (Section 20): Suppose the SIC finds that the PIO denied the request without reasonable cause, missed the time limit, or knowingly gave incorrect information. In that case, the SIC can impose a penalty of $250 per day until the office furnishes the information, up to a maximum of $25,000.
• Compensation: In addition, the SIC can recommend disciplinary action. It can also direct the public authority to compensate the applicant for any harm they suffered (Section 19(8)(b)), as outlined in Public Accountability: RTI Act in Action.

Altogether, these two provisions work as a pair. The penalty deters future non-compliance, while the compensation addresses the harm the applicant already suffered.

---

🎯 Key Officers and Action Point

Officer Role	Name/Designation	Responsibility Violated
Defaulting PIO	Bhadohi (Sant Ravidas Nagar)-DPRO	Failure to provide information within 30 days (Sec. 7(1)).
Nodal Officer	SHRI. S.N. SINGH	Failure to monitor and ensure compliance within the directorate.

Given all this, the applicant should start the First Appeal process right away. Doing so upholds their right to information. It also, ultimately, helps ensure transparency in the developmental schemes of Village Panchayat Dhanwatiya. After all, deemed refusals can easily go unchallenged, and therefore unpunished, without sustained follow-up at each stage.

---

📝 DPRO Bhadohi & RTI Application Analysis: Seeking Transparency in Village Panchayat Development (DIRPR/R/2025/61901)

Meanwhile, this section breaks down the DPRO Bhadohi & RTI application filed by Mr. Devi Prasad Gupta, seeking detailed records on developmental schemes in a Village Panchayat in Bhadohi district, Uttar Pradesh. Overall, the application highlights the need for transparency and accountability at the grassroots level, especially given how officials spend public funds on local infrastructure.

🔍 Application Overview & Status

Detail	Information
Registration Number	DIRPR/R/2025/61901
Date of Filing	29/07/2025
Applicant Name	Devi Prasad Gupta (Gender: Male, Status: Literate Above Graduate)
Public Authority	Panchayati Raj Directorate
Current Status	RTI REQUEST RECEIVED as on 29/07/2025
Target Location	Village Panchayat – Dhanwatiya, Post- Barwa, Development block- Bhadohi, District- Bhadohi (PIN- 221402)

---

🎯 Five Key Information Points Sought in the RTI Application

Specifically, the applicant asks for detailed information on developmental schemes executed in Village Panchayat – Dhanwatiya over the last four years and the current year:

1. Estimates: Provide the estimates of all executed developmental schemes.
2. Fund Distribution: Provide the distribution of government funds in the executed developmental schemes.
3. Work Booklet: Provide the work booklet (records) of the executed developmental schemes.
4. Fund Release Description: Provide the description of the release of government funds for the developmental schemes.
5. Wall Painting Details: Provide the wall painting details and the government fund spent on them, as part of the developmental schemes.

Together, these five points paint a complete financial picture. They span everything from initial estimates through fund release to final expenditure. In short, the applicant asks the Public Information Officer to provide all five points within the stipulated 30 days, as Section 7(1) of the RTI Act, 2005 requires.

Notably, this scope is deliberately broad. It covers every developmental scheme executed over a four-year period, not just one. As such, a complete response would require the DPRO’s office to compile records across multiple financial years. That task is demanding, yet it still falls squarely within the PIO’s statutory duty.

---

🏛️ DPRO Bhadohi PIO and Nodal Officer Contact Details

Ultimately, the Public Information Officer (PIO) for Bhadohi bears responsibility for providing the information. Below, therefore, you’ll find contact details for both the PIO and the Nodal Officer, in case readers facing a similar DPRO Bhadohi & RTI application issue want to follow up directly.

👤 PIO Details (DPRO, Bhadohi)

Detail	Contact Information
Name	Bhadohi (Sant Ravidas Nagar)-DPRO
Designation	DPRO (District Panchayati Raj Officer)
Mobile	9450981727
Email	dprosr-up[at]nic[dot]in

🧑‍💼 Nodal Officer Details

Detail	Contact Information
Name	SHRI. S.N. SINGH
Mobile	9795140577
Email	up[dot]panchayatiraj[at]gmail[dot]com

Even so, contact details alone rarely guarantee a response. Therefore, applicants should document every call and email as evidence for a potential future appeal, and can review the Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act for background on how this office is structured.

---

⚖️ Call for Transparency and Accountability

Finally, the applicant makes a strong appeal in the RTI request itself. He notes that the RTI Act was introduced to promote transparency and accountability in public authorities. In this way, the application directly uses the Act to scrutinize public expenditure and scheme execution at the local Village Panchayat level. It demands records that matter for public oversight.

Similarly, regular readers of this series will recognize the pattern. Delays and deemed refusals keep surfacing across Uttar Pradesh’s Panchayati Raj offices, as seen in Institutional Apathy Erodes RTI: A Deep Dive. This suggests the problem extends well beyond a single application or district. Consequently, each successful escalation — from First Appeal, to Second Appeal, to penalty — sets a precedent. That precedent, in turn, may encourage other applicants to pursue their own pending requests with greater confidence.

In conclusion, the DPRO Bhadohi & RTI application case shows that the RTI Act, 2005 offers a strong legal framework. Still, its real-world effectiveness depends on applicants actively pursuing every available remedy. Therefore, this case deserves close attention. It reveals how well the Bhadohi DPRO’s office complies with the law. It may also shape how future RTI applicants approach their own cases across the region.