Unpaid and Unheard: The Story of a Worker Grievance in the Haryana State highlights the struggles faced by countless laborers who often find themselves marginalized and voiceless in their fight for basic rights and fair compensation.
In the bustling industrial regions of Haryana, many workers dedicate their lives to toiling in factories and fields, yet they frequently encounter issues such as delayed wages, exploitative practices, and a lack of support from local authorities.
The plight of these workers, who sacrifice their health and well-being for minimal pay, illuminates the urgent need for systemic reform and greater accountability.
Their stories, often intertwined with themes of desperation and resilience, reflect a broader narrative of social injustice and inequity that demands attention and action from all sectors of society.

A system protects the rights of workers. Yet, what happens when a cry for help reaches a bureaucratic dead end? This is, indeed, the story of a labourer struggling for his rightful wages. He files a grievance with hope; nonetheless, the outcome raises more questions than it answers.

In December 2024, a public grievance portal received this case in the state of Haryana, revealing the struggle faced by contract workers in this part of India. This shed light on the challenges that contract workers face. Furthermore, it also highlighted the frustrating realities of seeking redressal.

The Heart of the Matter: A Worker’s Plight

Mr. Brijesh Kumar Saroj, a B.A. graduate, filed the case after taking up a helper position through a manpower agency in Gurugram, Haryana state.

The core allegations laid out in the grievance were:

  • Hired but Unpaid: OM Associates, a manpower solutions agency in Gurugram, hired Mr. Saroj on June 25, 2024.
  • Work at Multiple Companies: He provided services at two different companies under this agency:
    1. At a “U.T.M. company” from June 25 to July 13, 2024.
    2. At U.T.L. Solar Power company in Rewari, Haryana, from July 27 to August 28, 2024.
  • Wages Withheld: Despite completing his work, the agency supervisor, Mr. Bhupendra Sharma, allegedly withheld Mr. Saroj’s salary for both periods.
  • Alleged Forgery: When Mr. Saroj demanded his payment, the supervisor allegedly gave him a forged Google Pay payment slip. This created the illusion of a transaction. Nonetheless, his bank account never received the credited money.

The complainant argued that this was not an isolated incident. Instead, it was part of a larger, organized exploitation of unemployed youth in Haryana. Moreover, the complainant urged the Deputy Labour Commissioner’s office to intervene, as they wanted to ensure justice.

A Timeline of Unfulfilled Promises

  • June 25, 2024: Mr. Saroj joins the manpower agency.
  • June 25 – July 13, 2024: The first company withholds payment for my work.
  • July 27 – August 28, 2024: The second company withholds payment for my work again.
  • September – December 2024: We repeatedly attempt to secure payment, but we encounter delays and allegations of deception from employers in Haryana state.
  • December 13, 2024: The Government of Haryana receives a formal grievance filed through the central portal.
  • December 20, 2024: The team closed the grievance.

The System Responds: “Case Closed”

Within just one week, authorities closed the case summarily. They provided a terse, two-word explanation:

“Demand/not maintainable.”

Obviously, This classification suggests the authorities deemed the grievance outside their purview or invalid for procedural reasons. They did not give any further guidance or explanation to the aggrieved party.

A Voice of Disappointment: The Aftermath

The complainant’s response, recorded in the grievance portal’s feedback section, paints a stark picture of disillusionment. Moreover, they expressed profound disappointment with the state’s law and order machinery in Haryana state. As a result, such dismissals allow fraudulent elements to work with impunity.

The feedback highlighted a deep-seated frustration. It stated, “If the protectors will act like predators then who will decide the destiny of the common people?” The remarks pointed towards a perceived rampant arbitrariness and corruption within public offices. This undermines the very goal of good governance. It erodes the trust of ordinary citizens in the systems meant to protect them.

What Does This Case Tell Us?

This incident serves as a poignant case study. A worker presented a detailed complaint with names, dates, and specific allegations of non-payment and forgery. In return, the system offered a swift but opaque closure.

It leaves us with critical questions:

  • What recourse does a worker like Mr. Saroj have when the designated authority deems his demand “not maintainable”?
  • Does such a response encourage employers and agencies to bypass labour laws in Haryana?
  • How can we make grievance redressal systems more transparent and accountable? Moreover, how can we ensure they are truly effective for the most vulnerable members of our workforce in the Haryana state?

For every Brijesh Kumar Saroj, countless others, indeed, share untold stories of workers across Haryana state. Furthermore, his case reminds us that the existence of a grievance portal is only the first step. Consequently, the true measure of justice depends on the diligence, empathy, and accountability with which we handle each grievance.

A syndicate is cheating poor unemployed youth through its wide network, exploiting their vulnerabilities and desperate situations for personal gain.

This organization operates in the shadows, luring these young individuals with false promises of job opportunities and financial support, only to leave them disillusioned and deeper in debt.
Many of these unsuspecting youths are drawn in by the allure of easy money and quick employment, often leaving them with dreams of a better future that quickly turn into nightmares.

As they invest their hopes and limited resources into these fraudulent schemes, the syndicate manipulates their aspirations, creating a vicious cycle of deception and exploitation that is difficult to escape.With each new scam, deeper emotional and financial scars are inflicted, as these young people begin to realize that they are merely pawns in a game designed to benefit the unscrupulous few while destroying their lives.


Haryana police sent warrant notice on whatapp of Yogi M. P. Singh while he is neither DH nor JD

Home » Grievance Redress in Haryana state: A Worker’s Tale

2 responses to “Grievance Redress in Haryana state: A Worker’s Tale”

  1. Deputy commissioner of the department of labour of Gurugram Haryana submitted an arbitrary and inconsistent report in the matter which is a mockery of the law of land. Either the concerned staff of the Government of Haryana are incompetent or could not understand the contents of the grievance.

  2. A large number of cheater companies have made their platform in the state of Haryana this is quite obvious from the many cybercrime related activities that are operated from the state of Haryana quite obvious from the investigation of the investigating agencies. Most of the people are crying because of such fraud as their hard earned money are not safe in their bank accounts.

Facing a similar challenge? Share the details in the box below, and our team of experts will do their best to help.

December 2024
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  
  1. Preeti Singh's avatar
  2. Yogi M. P. Singh's avatar
  3. Yogi M. P. Singh's avatar
  4. Preeti Singh's avatar
  5. Preeti Singh's avatar

Discover more from Yogi-Human Rights Defender, Anti-corruption Crusader & RTI Activist

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading