Government’s neglect in waterlogging solutions has become a pressing issue. This affects countless communities across the nation. The lack of effective drainage systems exacerbates flooding during the monsoon season. As a result, property damage and health risks arise due to stagnant water. Despite the available technology and expertise, resources are often misallocated or underfunded. This leaves vulnerable populations to contend with the aftermath. Local governments must prioritize sustainable infrastructure development. They should also engage residents in planning processes to identify specific needs. By taking a proactive approach, the government can mitigate the adverse effects of waterlogging. This will foster safer living conditions for all citizens.

Key takeaways from the blog post

The blog post highlights a significant gap. This gap exists between the Uttar Pradesh government’s high-level economic ambitions and the realities faced by its citizens on the ground.
Here are the key takeaways: (Government’s Neglect in Waterlogging Solutions)

• The “Partnership” Paradox: The government aggressively promotes Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) for large-scale projects worth ₹4 trillion. However, it refuses to apply the same collaborative principle to individual citizens. These citizens step in to perform essential public works.
• Failure of Essential Services: The grievance stems from Surekapuram and Mirzapur. The situation has caused serious problems for the residents. Consequently, one resident had to personally fund a solution.
• Bureaucratic Obstruction: Despite the citizen solving a public health issue involving inundated streets, the government dismissed the claim for reimbursement. They labeled the work as “personal and temporary,” thereby absolving themselves of financial responsibility.
• Inconsistent Funding Policies: There is a glaring contradiction in policy. The state is increasing Viability Gap Funding (VGF) to 30% to subsidize private corporations. However, it offers 0% support to a citizen performing an “obligatory duty” of the government.
• Allegations of Corruption and Neglect: The post reflects deep-seated frustration. This frustration stems from the alleged diversion of public funds toward the private interests of political figures. There is a widespread perception that official help is only available through bribery.
• A “Mockery of Development”: The core argument is that we cannot measure true development solely by grand infrastructure projects. If officials neglect basic municipal functions, citizens have to take matters into their own hands and build their own sewers.

Government’s Neglect in Waterlogging Solutions: When PPP Models Fail the Common Citizen in Uttar Pradesh

In the bustling narrative of modern India, Uttar Pradesh is often projected as the new frontier of industrial growth and infrastructure excellence. Under the leadership of Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, the state has become a magnet for investment. It has reportedly secured projects worth ₹4 trillion. This transformation is driven by the overarching vision of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. There are massive defence corridors and sprawling medical colleges in Baghpat and Hathras. The Public-Private Partnership (PPP) model is the engine behind this growth. (Government’s Neglect in Waterlogging Solutions)

However, beneath the glossy surface of high-budget infrastructure lies a starkly different reality for the individual taxpayer. In the neighbourhood of Surekapuram, Mirzapur, a . This grievance highlights a troubling disconnect. While the government champions “Partnership” with global conglomerates, it seemingly refuses to partner with the very citizens who fund its coffers.

---

The Grievance: A Community Underwater

The core issue began with a basic, fundamental failure of urban planning and municipal responsibility: waterlogging. In the Bhujwa Ki Chowki area, rain transformed residential land into an inundated swamp, paralyzing daily life. Despite multiple representations to the government, the response was characterized by what the complainant describes as a “lackadaisical approach.”

When the state fails to provide essential drainage, the citizen is left with two choices. They can either remain trapped in unsanitary conditions or take matters into their own hands.Shri Singh chose the latter. He hired labourers and a mason. Using his own funds, he constructed a temporary drainage system with bricks, cement, and sand. This action helped restore normalcy to the area.

The Official Response: A Study in Bureaucratic Rigidity

Following the completion of this work, a grievance was filed. The registration number is GOVUP/E/2025/0050113. The grievance requests that the Block Development Officer (BDO) evaluate the expenditure. The grievance asked for partial reimbursement. The logic was simple: the individual performed a duty that was legally and ethically the state’s responsibility. (Government’s Neglect in Waterlogging Solutions)

The response from the Village Panchayat Secretary, Vijay Pratap, was noted. The case was subsequently closed by the Chief Minister’s Secretariat. This revealed a rigid bureaucratic wall.

• The Findings: The officials acknowledged that the plotting occurred near Bhujwa Chowki and that the applicant built a house there.
• The Denial: The report stated that since the work was “personal and temporary” and conducted on “plotted land,” the Village Panchayat could not legally process the payment.
• The Result: The case was closed, leaving the citizen to bear the full financial burden of a public utility project.

---

The PPP Double Standard

The most biting irony in this situation is the government’s own policy. The Uttar Pradesh government is currently increasing Viability Gap Funding (VGF) from 20% to 30% to encourage private developers to take on projects. This means the state is more than willing to hand over public funds to private corporations to mitigate their risks.

Yet, when a private individual—a citizen—mitigates a public risk (waterlogging) by spending their own money, the concept of “Viability Gap Funding” or “Partnership” suddenly vanishes. As the complainant noted: (Government’s Neglect in Waterlogging Solutions)

“If the government works on the criteria of Public-Private Partnership, then when a private individual spends money from his own pocket for public relief, the government must provide support.”

The refusal to reimburse even a fraction of the cost suggests that the elite reserve the “Partnership” in PPP for themselves, while they expect the common man to pay taxes for services that never arrive and then pay again to build those services themselves.

---

Allegations of Systemic Neglect and Corruption

The grievance doesn’t stop at the lack of reimbursement; it points toward a deeper systemic rot. The complainant claims that the government only extends its “constructive way” to those who bribe public staff. While such claims are difficult to prove without a formal inquiry, they reflect a growing sentiment of frustration among citizens. Many people observe political leaders and real estate tycoons utilising public funds for their private interests. Meanwhile, basic drainage remains a “luxury.” (Government’s Neglect in Waterlogging Solutions)

When a citizen proactively attempts to fix a community problem, a cold dismissal can be disheartening. Hearing “not possible to pay” discourages civic engagement. This response can also breed resentment within the community.

---

The Mockery of Development

Development is not merely the construction of highways or the signing of MoUs in Lucknow; it is the quality of life in the streets of Mirzapur. The complainant aptly describes the current situation as a “mockery of development.” On one side of the screen, officials spend billions on “New India,” while on the other, a citizen pleads for recognition of wages for three days of masonry work. (Government’s Neglect in Waterlogging Solutions)

The decision-makers ignored the applicant’s “logistic approach” and instead produced an “arbitrary and inconsistent reply.” By labelling the work as “personal,” the authorities conveniently overlooked that waterlogging in a residential area is a public health hazard and a failure of municipal governance.

---

Conclusion: A Call for Accountability

The case of Yogi M.P. Singh is a microcosm of the challenges facing the “Double Engine” government. If Uttar Pradesh aims to be a “preferred investment destination,” it must first prove that it is a liveable destination for its current residents. (Government’s Neglect in Waterlogging Solutions)

The government must bridge the gap between its high-level PPP policies and its grassroots-level grievance redressal. A “Partnership” that only flows upward to corporations and never downward to the citizen is not a partnership—it is an extraction. It is time for the BDO and the Joint Secretary, Shri Arvind Mohan, to reconsider this matter not as a “personal expenditure” but as a citizen-led infrastructure initiative that deserves state backing.

---

What do you think? Should the government reimburse citizens who perform public works when the state fails to act?

To effectively follow up on your grievance, use the structured contact details and digital links for the relevant public authorities in Uttar Pradesh.

---

1. Primary Escallation Authority (CM Secretariat) (Government’s Neglect in Waterlogging Solutions)

Since you find the result of your previous grievance unsatisfactory, direct your appeal or fresh representation to the Joint Secretary who oversees these matters.

• Name: Shri Arvind Mohan
• Designation: Joint Secretary, Chief Minister Secretariat
• Office Address: Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow, PIN: 226001
• Official Email: arvind.12574@gov.in
• Contact Number: 0522-2226350 / 0522-2226354

---

2. Local Administration (Mirzapur District) (Government’s Neglect in Waterlogging Solutions)

For ground-level verification and seeking reimbursement from the Block Development funds, you may contact:

Office	Designation	Contact Number	Email / Location
BDO Office City	Block Development Officer	9454465108	City Block, Mirzapur
District Magistrate	DM Mirzapur	9454417567	dm-mirzapur@nic.in
DDO Mirzapur	District Development Officer	9454465108	ddomirzapur@gmail.com

---

3. Digital Links and Helplines (Government’s Neglect in Waterlogging Solutions)

You can reopen your case, file a “Reminder” against your closed ID, or lodge a new complaint if a senior engineer didn’t conduct a proper site visit for your previous dismissal using these platforms.

• IGRS Jansunwai Portal:jansunwai.up.nic.in
  • Note: Use the “Send Reminder” option for your existing ID: GOVUP/E/2025/0050113.
• CM Helpline: Dial 1076 (Toll-Free, 24/7)
• Technical Support Email: jansunwai-up@gov.in (Only for portal issues, not for lodging complaints).

---

4. Reference IDs for Your Records (Government’s Neglect in Waterlogging Solutions)

Always quote these IDs in any email or letter to ensure the department can track the history of your case:

• Current Grievance ID: GOVUP/E/2025/0050113
• Previous Reference ID: 60000240166277

5. Strategy for Re-filing (Government’s Neglect in Waterlogging Solutions)

When you contact the Joint Secretary, I recommend using the following points:

1. Demand a Technical Evaluation: Ask specifically for a Junior Engineer (JE) to visit, as the Village Panchayat Secretary is not a technical expert in drainage costs.
2. Invoke the PPP Policy: Explicitly mention that if the state provides Viability Gap Funding to corporations, it must provide “Part Support” to a citizen performing a state duty.

Would you like me to draft a professional email addressed to Shri Arvind Mohan using these specific IDs and arguments?