Tehsildar Diksha Lalganj Mirzapur does not know the stipulated time to supply information, which raises significant concerns regarding administrative accountability and transparency.
Hence, Tehsildar Diksha Lalganj Mirzapur violated section 7 (1) of the RTI Act 2005, a law designed to empower citizens by ensuring timely access to information from public authorities.
This raises an important question: whether SDM Lalganj will support the anarchy of Tehsildar Diksha Lalganj Mirzapur by overlooking these violations or take a firm stand to uphold the integrity of the RTI Act.
As citizens become increasingly aware of their rights, the pressure mounts on officials to adhere to legal guidelines, and the need for effective governance becomes more pressing.
This situation could potentially lead to a loss of public trust in the local administration if left unaddressed.

Filing a First Appeal Under the RTI Act: A Case Study

Have you ever filed an RTI application and not received a prompt response within the specified time limit? This frustrating situation, known as a “deemed refusal,” is a common issue faced by many applicants seeking information. It can lead to a sense of helplessness and confusion about the next steps to take.
Fortunately, the Right to Information Act, 2005, provides a clear recourse: the First Appeal.
This mechanism allows applicants to challenge the inaction of the Public Information Officer, essentially holding them accountable for their responsibilities under the law.
By filing a First Appeal, you not only empower yourself in your quest for transparency but also contribute to reinforcing the importance of the RTI Act in promoting open governance.
Let’s break down a recent case to see how this process works and the positive outcomes that can arise from taking this crucial step.

The Situation: A “Deemed Refusal”

An individual named Shivam Gupta filed an online RTI application on August 2, 2025, with the registration number DMOMR/R/2025/60190. This application was meticulously crafted to address the growing concerns over transparency in government operations, reflecting the increasing demand for accountability from public officials.

The application was directed to the Tehsildar of Lalganj, Smt. Diksha, seeking various service and posting details of government employees in the Tehsil, including their job roles,
tenure, and the specific responsibilities they hold within the local administration.

By requesting this information, Gupta aims to shed light on the operational efficiencies and personnel allocations that shape the effectiveness of local governance, hoping to foster a more informed and engaged citizenry in the region.

According to Section 7(1) of the RTI Act, a Public Information Officer (PIO) must supply the requested information. This should be done within 30 days of receiving the application. In this case, the deadline was September 1, 2025. Nonetheless, the PIO neglected to respond, neither providing the information nor offering a reason for the delay. This non-response triggered the provision for a “deemed refusal” under Section 7(2) of the Act.

The Appeal: Taking the Next Step

Following the deemed refusal, Shivam Gupta filed a First Appeal on September 15, 2025, with the registration number DMOMR/A/2025/60134. This appeal represents a crucial step in Shivam’s quest for transparency and accountability, as he hopes to challenge the initial decision that he believes was unjust.
The appeal was meticulously prepared and addressed to the First Appellate Authority (FAA), which is tasked with reviewing cases like his to ensure fair treatment under the law.
Gulab Chandra Second serves as the Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM) of Lalganj, and his role is significant as he oversees the implementation of local governance and ensures that citizens’ grievances are heard and addressed adequately.
Shivam hopes that the FAA will carefully consider the facts presented in his appeal and make a fair determination, thereby reaffirming citizens’ rights to seek redressal against bureaucratic decisions.

The appeal formally outlines the violation of the RTI Act and requests specific relief from the FAA.

What the Appeal Seeks

In his appeal, Shivam Gupta makes a three-part request to the FAA: first, he seeks a thorough review of the regulatory framework that underpins current operational protocols, emphasizing the need for transparency and clarity in the regulations that govern aviation safety;
second, he requests the implementation of more stringent measures aimed at enhancing pilot training and assessment programs to ensure that all personnel are exceptionally prepared for unexpected scenarios;
finally, he calls for the FAA to consider the incorporation of advanced technologies, which could significantly improve monitoring and response mechanisms in real-time, thereby fostering a safer air travel environment for all users.

• Direct the PIO: He asks the FAA to instruct the Tehsildar. The Tehsildar should promptly supply the full information originally requested. The data must be point-wise. The information should be provided free of charge because of the delay, as mandated by Section 7(6) of the Act.
• Start Disciplinary Proceedings: The appellant urges the FAA to start disciplinary action against the PIO. This is under Section 20(2) for not responding within the legal time limit.
• Impose a Penalty: Finally, he asks the FAA to consider imposing a monetary penalty on the PIO. This is as stipulated by Section 20(1) of the RTI Act. This measure is to punish the delay and obstruction of information flow.

Key Takeaway: Don’t Give Up!

This case demonstrates a crucial aspect of the RTI process. If a PIO fails to respond to your application, you have a clear legal right to escalate the matter, as this is not just a procedural oversight but a violation of your rights as a citizen.
Filing a First Appeal is an essential step to make sure transparency and accountability are upheld in our governance systems.
This appeal not only serves to rectify the lack of response but also reinforces the principle that public authorities must adhere to the laws governing information access.
It’s a powerful tool that helps hold public authorities responsible, thereby ensuring that they remain transparent and accountable to the public.
Furthermore, the process of appealing is pivotal in reinforcing your right to information, empowering you to demand answers and fostering a culture of openness within government entities.
By standing firm in your right to seek information through this legal channel, you contribute to a more informed society and encourage others to do the same.

Appeal of Sadhna Tiwari against PIO Tehsil Lalganj for not entertaining RTI application

Second appeal against PIO Tehsil Lalganj for concealing information of corruption