The Commission’s role in justice for Sadhana Tiwari has been central to her fight for accountability, ensuring that her voice is heard amid the ongoing struggle for recognition of her plight. The Human Rights Commission should be instrumental in delivering that justice, not only by addressing the immediate grievances but also by implementing systemic changes that prevent such injustices from occurring in the future. It is crucial for the Commission to actively engage with the affected communities, gather comprehensive testimonies, and work collaboratively with other organizations to create a holistic approach towards restorative justice that honors Sadhana’s experiences and validates her courage.
Key Takeaways
- The Commission’s Role in Justice for Sadhana involves addressing her grievances and implementing systemic changes.
- Sadhana Tiwari filed three petitions from September 2024 to June 2025, highlighting negligence from police in enforcing directives.
- Despite the Commission’s clear orders, the Mirzapur police failed to investigate effectively, leading to further petitions from Sadhana.
- The case underscores issues of accountability, human rights violations, and the need for genuine inquiry by the Commission.
- Ultimately, the effectiveness of the Commission’s intervention will determine justice for Sadhana Tiwari.
Background: A Timeline of the Commission’s Role in Justice for Sadhana Tiwari
Sadhana Tiwari filed her first petition on September 2, 2024. In it, she brought a complaint before the Uttar Pradesh Human Rights Commission about an incident from November 27, 2023. In response, the commission disposed of the case on September 5, 2024. Specifically, it directed the Superintendent of Police in Mirzapur to investigate and take the necessary action.
However, the Superintendent of Police in Mirzapur neglected to act on the commission’s directive. As a result, Sadhana Tiwari filed a second petition on January 21, 2025. Notably, this petition, diary number 367/IN/2025, sought compliance with the commission’s earlier order.
Subsequently, the Senior Superintendent of Police, Mirzapur, submitted a report through the Circle Officer of Lalganj on February 28, 2025. Yet this report was allegedly inconsistent and false, which the complainant considered a travesty of justice.
Consequently, Sadhana Tiwari submitted a third petition on June 26, 2025, under diary number 4255/IN/2025. Specifically, the petition aimed to challenge the arbitrary report the Circle Officer had provided. Altogether, all three petitions fall under the main case file number 10035/24/55/2024.
Below is the Commission’s own response, together with the full text of the petition. These documents are at the heart of the Commission’s role in justice for Sadhana Tiwari.
Uttar Pradesh — U.P. Human Rights Commission
TC-34 V-1, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, UTTAR PRADESH -120
Sadhana Tiwari, Surekapuram Colony, Jabalpur Road Mirzapur City Pin code 231001, MIRZAPUR, UTTAR PRADESH. Dated: 09/09/2025.
Dear Sadhana Tiwari,
The Commission has received your complaint, and it has assigned diary number as 6291/IN/2025 with the next details: –
Complainant Details Name: Sadhana Tiwari Mobile: 6387233091 Email: sadhanamishramzp@gmail.com Address: Surekapuram Colony Jabalpur Road Mirzapur City Pin code 231001 District: MIRZAPUR State: UTTAR PRADESH
File Uploaded successfully (orderuphrc.pdf)
Victim Details: Complainant and victim are the same person.
Incident Details Incident Place: Office of CO Lalganj Incident Date: 28/02/2025 Incident Category: ABUSE OF POWER Incident District: MIRZAPUR Incident State: UTTAR PRADESH Is it filed before any Court / State HRC: No
Before the Commission: Its Role in Justice for Sadhana Tiwari
Case/File Number: 10035/24/55/2024. Diary Number: 4255/IN/2025. Main Complainant: Sadhana Tiwari, W/O Omkar Nath Tiwari, Surekapuram colony, Jabalpur Road, Mirzapur, PIN Code 231001.
Topic: Petition against the arbitrary, inconsistent, and false report. Specifically, the report is dated February 28, 2025, and was submitted by the Circle Officer, Lalganj, District Mirzapur. This was in compliance with the Commission’s order dated September 5, 2024.
Most Respected Honourable Chairperson and Members,
The petitioner, Sadhana Tiwari, submits this third petition with utmost humility. In it, she aims to bring to your attention the deliberate non-compliance and travesty of justice perpetuated by the police authorities. These include the Superintendent of Police, Mirzapur, and the Circle Officer, Lalganj. Specifically, the actions of these officials defy this esteemed Commission’s directions. Moreover, they gravely violate the petitioner’s fundamental human rights.
Brief Background on the Commission’s Role in Justice for Sadhana Tiwari
- This matter concerns the criminal conspiracy to usurp the ancestral property of the petitioner. Specifically, her relatives perpetrated this conspiracy in collusion with government officials from the Revenue Department.
- Accordingly, on September 5, 2024, this Honourable Commission, after perusing the petitioner’s initial complaint (Diary No. 3613/IN/2024), directed the Superintendent of Police, Mirzapur, to look into the matter and take necessary action.
- Despite this clear directive, the Superintendent of Police failed to take any action. Consequently, the petitioner was compelled to file a second petition on January 21, 2025 (Diary No. 367/IN/2025) to seek compliance with the Commission’s order.
- In response, a report dated February 28, 2025, was submitted by the Circle Officer, Lalganj. This report is demonstrably false and inconsistent, failing to address the core criminal allegations raised by the petitioner. Instead of investigating the criminal offenses, the police claimed it’s a land dispute. Ultimately, their real aim is to shirk their duty and deny justice.
Submissions of the Petitioner
The petitioner’s grievances are not a civil land dispute. Rather, it is a clear case of criminal offenses. Specifically, it involves cheating, forgery, and criminal conspiracy as defined under the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The next points underscore the criminal nature of this matter:
Key Grounds Supporting the Petition (Commission’s Role in Justice for Sadhana)
Ground 1
- Usurping Property Through Deceit and Manipulation: The petitioner was a Class-I legal heir to her grandfather’s property. She was a minor girl aged 10 at the time of his death in 2005. This was according to the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Nevertheless, her relatives colluded with officials from the Tehsil (Lekhpal, Revenue Inspector, and Tehsildar). They then manipulated revenue records to remove her name from the inheritance. Consequently, this act of disinheritance is a criminal offense. It falls under Section 420 (Cheating). It also includes Section 466/467/468 (Forgery of records) and Section 471 (Using a forged document) of the IPC.
#Ground 2
- Failure of Police to Act on Criminal Allegations: The police authorities have a statutory duty. Specifically, this is under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and it includes the Superintendent of Police, Mirzapur. They must register a First Information Report (FIR) and investigate cognizable offenses. The petitioner’s complaint clearly outlines offenses under Sections 466, 467, 468, 420, 195, and 471 of the IPC. Yet the police neglected to register an FIR. Instead, they submitted a perfunctory report. Altogether, these actions are a dereliction of their legal duty.
Ground 3
- Violation of Human Rights: The actions of the petitioner’s relatives violate the petitioner’s fundamental human rights. Likewise, the inaction of the police violates these rights. These rights include the right to property and the right to a dignified life. Furthermore, this case highlights a systemic failure to protect the rights of vulnerable sections of society. In particular, the rights of women and children, whose ancestral property was usurped with impunity, were specifically affected.
Prayer for Relief: Completing the Commission’s Role in Justice for Sadhana Tiwari
In light of the above submissions, the petitioner, Sadhana Tiwari, most respectfully prays that the Honourable Commission be kind to:
- Issue a fresh and more stringent direction to the Superintendent of Police, Mirzapur, to take immediate and decisive action.
- Order the registration of an FIR against the accused persons, including Dayashankar Mishra and Hariprasad Mishra, along with the colluding officials from the Revenue Department (Lekhpal, Revenue Inspector, and Tehsildar). Accordingly, the police must implicate them under the relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code.
- Start an inquiry into the conduct of the police officials, including the Circle Officer, Lalganj, who submitted an arbitrary and false report. Moreover, they neglected to follow the Commission’s prior order.
- Take any other action deemed appropriate by this Honourable Commission. This will guarantee justice served to vulnerable section. Ultimately, it will also set a precedent that such blatant violations of human rights will not be allowed in society.
Petitioner: Sadhana Tiwari W/O Omkar Nath Tiwari, Surekapuram colony, Jabalpur Road, Mirzapur, PIN Code 231001 Date: September 9, 2025
Case Records Supporting the Commission’s Role in Justice for Sadhana Tiwari
Based on the comprehensive documentation provided, here are the structured details including application identifiers, contact information, and relevant web links for your ongoing cases.
1. Case and Application Identifiers
These IDs are essential for tracking your grievances across different commissions i.e. Commission’s Role in Justice for Sadhana:
- National Human Rights Commission (NHRC): Case Number 10035/24/55/2024; Diary Number 6291/in/2025 (Received 09/09/2025)
- UP State Human Rights Commission (UPSHRC): Main File Number 10035/24/55/2024; Diary Number (Initial) 3613/IN/2024; Diary Number (January) 367/IN/2025; Diary Number (June) 4255/IN/2025
- UP Information Commission (RTI Appeal): Appeal Registration Number A-20250300419; File Number S09/A/0719/2025
- Revenue Department (Mirzapur): Revenue Case Numbers 255/2007 and 256/2007 (Dated 19/06/2007)
2. Contact Information (Emails and Mobile Numbers)
The following contact details are derived from your correspondence and official records:
Complainant Details: Name — Sadhana Tiwari; Mobile — 6387233091; Email — sadhanamishramzp@gmail.com
Institutional Emails: NHRC — nhrc.india@nic.in; UPHRC — uphrclko@yahoo.co.in, up-hrc@nic.in; UP Information Commission (Court S-9) — hearingcourts9.upic@up.gov.in; Governor’s Office (UP) — hgovup@nic.in; Chief Minister’s Office (UP) — cmup@nic.in; DGP Office (UP) — dgp@nic.in; Police Authorities — spmz-up@nic.in (SP Mirzapur), digrmz@nic.in (DIG Mirzapur)
3. Web Links for Tracking and References
You can use these portals to check the status of your applications or verify records:
- NHRC Case Status: www.nhrc.nic.in
- UP State Information Commission: www.upic.up.gov.in
- UP Human Rights Commission: uphrc.up.nic.in
- UP Revenue Records (Bhulekh): upbhulekh.gov.in (For Khatauni and inheritance tracking)
- Jansunwai (IGRS UP): jansunwai.up.nic.in (For tracking grievances submitted to the SP/CM office)
4. Summary of Key Entities Involved
- SP Mirzapur — Primary Authority directed by UPHRC to investigate.
- CO Lalganj — Officer who submitted the report dated 28/02/2025.
- Tehsil Lalganj — Revenue office where the 2007 inheritance was processed. (Commission’s Role in Justice for Sadhana)
- SHO Drummond Ganj — Local police official accused of failing to register the FIR.
Would you like me to draft a specific email to the NHRC referencing your latest Diary Number 6291/in/2025 to request an update on the consolidated case?
Conclusion: The Commission’s Role in Justice for Sadhana Tiwari
In summary, the Commission’s role in justice for Sadhana Tiwari will be tested by how it handles this third petition. Three separate filings, spanning September 2024 to June 2025, show the same pattern. The Commission issues a directive, and the police in Mirzapur leave it unenforced.
Ultimately, real accountability depends on the Commission ordering a proper FIR and a genuine inquiry, not another perfunctory report. Until then, Sadhana Tiwari’s case remains a clear test of whether human rights orders in Uttar Pradesh carry real weight.
Facing a similar challenge? Share the details in the box below, and our team of experts will do their best to help.