🚨 Final Proceedings: Escalation of Unanswered RTI Application (DIRPR/R/2025/61901)

The Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005, mandates that public authorities provide requested information within a strict timeframe. If the Public Information Officer (PIO) and Nodal Officer fail to entertain the RTI application (DIRPR/R/2025/61901) within the stipulated 30 days, the law provides a clear pathway for escalation and penal action.

This post outlines the necessary steps for the applicant, Mr. Devi Prasad Gupta, to pursue the matter through the statutory appeal process.


1. 🛑 Timeline Violation and Failure to Entertain

The RTI application was filed on 29/07/2025. Under Section 7(1) of the RTI Act, the PIO was required to furnish the information or issue a decision rejecting the request within 30 days of filing.

  • Deadline for Response: Approximately 28/08/2025.

If the deadline has passed without any satisfactory communication from the PIO or the Nodal Officer, this constitutes a deemed refusal under the Act, triggering the appeal process.

2. 📝 Filing the First Appeal (Section 19(1))

The immediate next step is to file the First Appeal to the designated First Appellate Authority (FAA).

Details of the First Appeal:

3. ⚖️ Filing the Second Appeal (Section 19(3))

If the FAA fails to deliver a decision on the First Appeal within 30 days (or 45 days if extended by the FAA in writing), the applicant must then proceed to the Second Appeal.

Details of the Second Appeal:

  • Who to File To: The State Information Commission (SIC) of Uttar Pradesh.
  • Grounds: Failure of the FAA to pass an order, or dissatisfaction with the order passed by the FAA.
  • Importance: This stage is crucial as the SIC holds the power to impose penalties on the defaulting officers.

4. 💰 Seeking Penalty and Compensation

If the case reaches the SIC, the applicant can request that the Commission take strict action against the defaulting PIO.

  • Penalty Clause (Section 20): If the PIO is found to have denied the request without reasonable cause, failed to furnish the information within the time limit, or knowingly given incorrect information, the SIC can impose a penalty of $250$ per day until the information is furnished, subject to a maximum of $25,000$.
  • Compensation: The SIC also has the power to recommend disciplinary action and direct the public authority to compensate the applicant for any detriment suffered (Section 19(8)(b)).

🎯 Key Officers and Action Point

Officer RoleName/DesignationResponsibility Violated
Defaulting PIOBhadohi (Sant Ravidas Nagar)-DPROFailure to provide information within 30 days (Sec. 7(1)).
Nodal OfficerSHRI. S.N. SINGHFailure to monitor and ensure compliance within the directorate.

The applicant should immediately initiate the First Appeal process to uphold their right to information and ensure transparency in the developmental schemes of Village Panchayat Dhanwatiya.


📝 RTI Application Analysis: Seeking Transparency in Village Panchayat Development (DIRPR/R/2025/61901)

This post provides a structured analysis of the Right to Information (RTI) application filed by Mr. Devi Prasad Gupta, seeking detailed records on developmental schemes in a Village Panchayat in Bhadohi district, Uttar Pradesh. The application emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability at the grassroots level.

🔍 Application Overview & Status

DetailInformation
Registration NumberDIRPR/R/2025/61901
Date of Filing29/07/2025
Applicant NameDevi Prasad Gupta (Gender: Male, Status: Literate Above Graduate)
Public AuthorityPanchayati Raj Directorate
Current StatusRTI REQUEST RECEVED as on 29/07/2025
Target LocationVillage Panchayat – Dhanwatiya, Post- Barwa, Development block- Bhadohi, District- Bhadohi (PIN- 221402)

🎯 Five Key Information Points Sought

The applicant seeks the following detailed information regarding developmental schemes executed in Village Panchayat – Dhanwatiya over the last four years and the current year:

  1. Estimates: Provide the estimates of all executed developmental schemes.
  2. Fund Distribution: Provide the distribution of government funds in the executed developmental schemes.
  3. Work Booklet: Provide the work booklet (records) of the executed developmental schemes.
  4. Fund Release Description: Provide the description of the release of government funds for the developmental schemes.
  5. Wall Painting Details: Provide the Wall painting details and the government fund spent on them, as part of the developmental schemes.

The request humbly asks the Public Information Officer to provide these 5 points of information within the stipulated 30 days as prescribed under Section 7(1) of the Right to Information Act 2005.


🏛️ Concerned PIO and Nodal Officer Contact Details

The responsibility for providing the information rests with the Public Information Officer (PIO) for Bhadohi.

👤 PIO Details (DPRO, Bhadohi)

DetailContact Information
NameBhadohi (Sant Ravidas Nagar)-DPRO
DesignationDPRO (District Panchayati Raj Officer)
Mobile9450981727
Emaildprosr-up[at]nic[dot]in

🧑‍💼 Nodal Officer Details

DetailContact Information
NameSHRI. S.N. SINGH
Mobile9795140577
Emailup[dot]panchayatiraj[at]gmail[dot]com

⚖️ Call for Transparency and Accountability

The applicant has included a strong appeal, noting that the RTI Act was introduced to promote transparency and accountability in the working of public authorities. This application is a direct effort to utilize the Act to scrutinize public expenditure and scheme execution at the local Village Panchayat level, demanding records that are essential for public oversight.

Home » DPRO Bhadohi: RTI Application Overview

4 responses to “DPRO Bhadohi: RTI Application Overview”

  1. Bhoomika Singh avatar

    There is no transparency and accountability in the working of public authorities in the Government of Uttar Pradesh so it is not confirm whether the district Panchayat Raj officer Bhadohi will provide information to the information seeker or not.

  2. Right to Information act 2005 was introduced by the government of India to promote transparency and account ability in the working of the public authority but it is most unfortunate that after 20 years Right to Information act 2005 could not achieve its goals.

  3. Beerbhadra Singh avatar
    Beerbhadra Singh

    If there is transparency and accountability in the working of the district Panchayat Raj officer Bhadohi, then he must provide the information to the information seeker under right tu information act 2005 concerning the development in the concerned village panchayat.

  4. Now a days it seems that Right to information act 2005 has been thrown into dustbin by the government and there is only show off a providing information. This August act was introduced by the government of India to control corruption but corruption itself diluted it.

Facing a similar challenge? Share the details in the box below, and our team of experts will do their best to help.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from Yogi-Human Rights Defender, Anti-corruption Crusader & RTI Activist

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Verified by MonsterInsights