Key Takeaways
- Shri Yogi M. P. Singh filed multiple complaints against CLUB HIGH SKY (OPC) PRIVATE LIMITED for regulatory non-compliance from 2023 to 2025.
- The Registrar of Companies (ROC) Kanpur sent initial communication requesting clarification but received no response, leading to escalated appeals by Singh.
- Key allegations include contractual failure and service deficiency, documented by Singh through evidence submitted to the ROC.
- Despite multiple reminders from the ROC, CLUB HIGH SKY failed to uphold its obligations, prompting Singh to seek regulatory action.
- ROC Kanpur has received all necessary documents, committing to review the case after Singh’s persistent follow-up.
CLUB HIGH SKY (OPC) PRIVATE LIMITED: A Citizen’s Persistent Grievance and Regulatory Battle
This blog post offers a structured overview of Shri Yogi M. P. Singh’s persistent efforts to seek regulatory action from the Registrar of Companies (ROC), Kanpur, against CLUB HIGH SKY (OPC) PRIVATE LIMITED — a One Person Company registered in India. Furthermore, the complaint spans multiple appeals and official communications from 2023 to 2025. Together, these documents reveal a clear pattern of non-compliance and service failure.
To provide structured clarity, the following section addresses the main grievance, initial regulatory actions, and the case’s starting point.
Shri Yogi M. P. Singh filed an initial complaint against CLUB HIGH SKY (OPC) PRIVATE LIMITED. As a result, ROC Kanpur promptly communicated with the company and sought a formal explanation.
- Grievance Registration Number: PMOPG/E/2023/0136208 related to CLUB HIGH SKY (OPC) PRIVATE LIMITED
- Date of Receipt: 09/07/2023
- Subject Company: M/s CLUB HIGH SKY (OPC) PRIVATE LIMITED
- ROC Kanpur’s Initial Letter (07/03/2023): The ROC sent an initial letter to CLUB HIGH SKY (OPC) PRIVATE LIMITED. It requested para-wise clarification with proof for each allegation within 15 days, warning that non-compliance would result in penal action under the Companies Act.
CLUB HIGH SKY (OPC) PRIVATE LIMITED failed to respond within the 15-day deadline. Consequently, Shri Singh filed subsequent appeals to escalate the matter.
A. Appeal DCOYA/E/A/23/0000928 (Received 17/05/2023)
- Reason: Shri Singh noted that over four months had passed since the ROC’s initial letter dated 07/03/2023. In addition, he criticised the authority’s delay in initiating action against the non-responsive company.
- Status: Appeal Closed (26/06/2023).
- Closing Remarks: “Duplicate complaint. Already processed. Appeal disposed.”
B. Appeal DCOYA/E/A/23/0001458 (Received 22/07/2023)
- Reason: Expressing an expectation that “now ROC Kanpur will take action in the matter which must be ensured.”
- ROC Kanpur’s Reminder Letter (17/07/2023): CLUB HIGH SKY (OPC) PRIVATE LIMITED still has not replied, prompting the ROC to issue a reminder. The ROC reiterated its request for a para-wise clarification within 15 days and restated the warning of penal action.
- Status: Appeal Closed (25/06/2025).
- Closing Remarks: “Action is being taken. If unsatisfied, email roc.kanpur@mca.gov.in. Appeal disposed.”
3. The Latest Development in the CLUB HIGH SKY (OPC) PRIVATE LIMITED Case: Direction from the AppellatShri Singh filed a new appeal (DCOYA/E/A/24/0002421). As a result, the appellate authority issued a specific direction. The final communication confirming this outcome is an email dated 30 June 2025.the authority.
Appeal DCOYA/E/A/24/0002421 (Closed 25/06/2025)
- Closing Remarks & Direction: The appellate authority directed Shri Singh to send proof of payment and any relevant agreement to ROC Kanpur. Specifically, he was asked to submit all supporting documents to roc.kanpur@mca.gov.in.
- Complainant’s Compliance (30/06/2025): Shri Singh promptly complied by emailing the ROC, attaching two PDFs:
- Ravi.pdf: Containing the approval form and the multi-page agreement between the parties.
- ROCKanpur.pdf: Contains ROC’s communications to the company and evidence of direct communication between Shri Singh and company staff, allegedly showing breach of agreement.
4. Summary and Next Steps
The timeline clearly demonstrates Shri Singh’s perseverance from early 2023 to mid-2025. Throughout this period, he consistently pushed the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) and ROC Kanpur to take decisive action against defaulter company.
| 07/03/2023 | ROC sends first notice to Company. | 15-day deadline set for company reply. |
| 17/05/2023 | Appeal DCOYA/E/A/23/0000928 filed | Highlights 4-month delay since notice. |
| 17/07/2023 | ROC sends reminder to Company. | Confirms no reply was received to the 07/03/2023 letter. |
| 22/07/2023 | Appeal DCOYA/E/A/23/0001458 filed | Seeks assurance of action. |
| 25/06/2025 | Appeal DCOYA/E/A/24/0002421 closed. | Appellate authority directs complainant to submit documents. |
| 30/06/2025 | Complainant submits documents via email. | Compliance with the appellate authority’s direction. |
ROC Kanpur has received all necessary documents on CLUB HIGH SKY (OPC) PRIVATE LIMITED. The authority has committed to examining the case. Shri Singh’s persistence shifted the case from non-response to active review by the regulator.
Below is a summary of the key official actions taken by ROC Kanpur, along with the deadlines it imposed throughout this case.
Key Actions and Deadlines by ROC Kanpur
| 07/03/2023 | Initial Letter/Notice Sent (NO. TC/COMP/PG/20-143909//339) | M/s CLUB HIGH SKY (OPC) PRIVATE LIMITED | Furnish para-wise clarification/explanation within 15 days. | No reply received by the ROC, leading to subsequent appeals by the complainant. |
| 17/07/2023 | Reminder Letter Sent (NO. TC/COMP/PG/20-143909/ T329) | M/s CLUB HIGH SKY (OPC) PRIVATE LIMITED | Furnish para-wise clarification/explanation within 15 days of the letter date, warning of penal action upon failure. | Status in 2023 indicated the reply was “awaited.” |
| 09/07/2023 | Final Reply to Grievance (PMOPG/E/2023/0136208) | Complainant (Yogi M. P. Singh) | Replied that a “Reminder issued to company and its director copy attached reply is awaited. | Confirmed ROC action but no resolution. |
| 25/06/2025 | Closing Remarks on Appeal DCOYA/E/A/24/0002421 | Complainant (Yogi M. P. Singh) | Kindly send proof of payment, relevant agreement, or any other relevant document to roc.kanpur@mca.gov.in. | Promptly complied with by the complainant on 30/06/2025 by submitting two PDF documents. |
This timeline highlights three actions by the ROC: the initial notice, follow-up reminder, and final direction. The last action followed appellate authority intervention requiring Shri Singh to submit evidence.
Shri Yogi M. P. Singh raises two key allegations against CLUB HIGH SKY (OPC) PRIVATE LIMITED, as outlined below. These come directly from the official Grievance Description and his email submissions:
CLUB HIGH SKY (OPC) PRIVATE LIMITED allegedly failed to uphold its obligations as defined in the contractual documents. This forms the most concrete allegation in the case.
- Evidence in Communication: The complainant’s email dated 30 June 2025 explicitly states that the attached documents show “how company staff broke the terms of agreement and did not provide any service to the aggrieved.”
- Documentation Submitted: Shri Singh attached Ravi.pdf, which includes the agreement made between the parties (pages 6 to 12). This document proves both the existence and the specific terms of the contract.
2. Failure to Provide Service
The breach of the agreement directly resulted in the failure to deliver the promised service. This raises concerns of potential consumer fraud and service deficiency. Moreover, because CLUB HIGH SKY (OPC) PRIVATE LIMITED remained non-compliant, Shri Singh pursued the matter through the corporate regulatory channel. In Communication: The complainant notes that the attachments detail how the company staff “did not provide any service to the aggrieved.”
- Documentation Submitted: Shri Singh submitted ROCKanpur.pdf (pages 3 to 10) to demonstrate the communication between himself and company staff. Specifically, this file shows how CLUB HIGH SKY (OPC) PRIVATE LIMITED broke the terms of the agreement. Furthermore, it likely contains correspondence, emails, or chat logs that illustrate the breakdown in service delivery and the company’s nonperformance.
Summary of the Complaint: This section addresses the core issues raised. The complaint targets CLUB HIGH SKY (OPC) PRIVATE LIMITED for Contractual Failure and Service Deficiency. Due to the company’s alleged non-responsiveness and non-compliance, Shri Singh escalated the matter to the Registrar of Companies (ROC). Accordingly, he sought regulatory action and penal provisions under the Companies Act against the company for its failure to respond to the ROC’s statutory notices.
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) oversees the Registrar of Companies (ROC) for Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand.
The official MCA website serves as the main portal for all ROC services, company registration, and compliance across India.
ROC Kanpur does not maintain a separate dedicated website. Instead, the central MCA portal manages all services, forms, public documents, and company master data — including information on CLUB HIGH SKY (OPC) PRIVATE LIMITED:
The Official Website for the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA):
This is where you would file complaints and check the company master data. Use this portal to file complaints, check company master data, and access all other corporate services related to ROC Kanpur.
Facing a similar challenge? Share the details in the box below, and our team of experts will do their best to help.