PIO is currently evading its responsibility to provide the much-needed UGC grant to MGKVP University, leading to significant concerns about the transparency of its allocation and the effectiveness of the mechanisms in place.
This avoidance not only hampers the financial stability of the institution but also raises questions about the overall commitment of PIO towards supporting higher education in our society.
As a result, stakeholders are left in a state of uncertainty regarding future funding and resource distribution, which directly impacts the academic environment and growth opportunities for students and faculty alike.
Seeking Transparency: A Second Appeal Against MGKVP University Under RTI Act
Welcome UPICR20240000149, UTTAR PRADESH INFORMATION COMMISSION.
This communication pertains to the Second Appeal made under section 19(3) of the Right to Information Act, 2005, which aims to promote transparency and accountability within government institutions.
The Appeal Registration Number associated with this case is A-20250900480, reflecting the formal processing of your request.
It is essential to note that this appeal was officially applied on the date of 05/09/2025 at 11:29:03 AM, marking a significant step in seeking the necessary information and ensuring that the principles of the Right to Information Act are upheld.
Your commitment to exercising this right is commendable and plays a crucial role in strengthening democratic governance.
Author: Yogi M. P. Singh
Location: Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh
Date: 5 September 2025
Introduction
In the pursuit of transparency and accountability, I, Yogi M. P. Singh, have taken a proactive step by filing a second appeal regarding the handling of public information requests. This appeal is presently under review by the Uttar Pradesh Information Commission in accordance with Section 19(3) of the Right to Information Act, 2005.
The origins of this appeal lie in the unsatisfactory responses I received, which were submitted by Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidyapith (MGKVP) University, Varanasi. These responses fail to adequately address my inquiries concerning the allocation and utilization of UGC funds, raising concerns about the university’s financial transparency and accountability.
Given the critical nature of this issue, it is essential for stakeholders and the public to gain insight into how these funds are being managed and to ensure that the university fulfills its obligations under the Right to Information Act. This matter not only reflects on the university’s practices but also highlights the broader importance of openness in educational institutions, which play a vital role in shaping the future of students and society.
Background of the RTI Application
Initially, on 9 May 2025, I submitted an RTI application (No. MGKVV/R/2025/60034) to the Public Information Officer (PIO) of MGKVP University. The request sought detailed information on:
- The breakdown of UGC fund utilization.
- Names and locations of affiliated institutions receiving grants.
- The mechanism of fund allocation.
The PIO was required to respond within 30 days under Section 7(1). Despite this, they delayed the reply until 21 August 2025. Even then, the response was incomplete and misleading.
First Appeal and Its Outcome
Subsequently, I filed a first appeal on 6 July 2025 (Appeal No. MGKVV/A/2025/60023) before the First Appellate Authority (FAA), Prof. Anand K. Tyagi, Vice Chancellor of MGKVP. Unfortunately, the FAA upheld the PIO’s deficient response. He did not address the core issues. As a result, he failed to exercise his quasi-judicial responsibilities under Section 19(1) of the RTI Act.
Grounds for Second Appeal
This second appeal is based on multiple legal and procedural lapses:
1. Violation of Section 7(1)
The PIO failed to respond within the mandated timeframe, violating the RTI Act’s provisions, which stipulate a maximum period for addressing requests to ensure transparency and accountability in public authorities. This delay not only undermines the intended purpose of the RTI Act but also deprives citizens of their right to access vital information, fostering a sense of distrust in governmental processes. Such lapses highlight the need for stricter adherence to timelines, as timely responses are crucial for promoting transparency and allowing individuals to make informed decisions based on the information they sought.
2. Incomplete and Misleading Information
The response lacked clarity and documentary evidence, especially regarding fund allocation and affiliated institutions, which are critical components in assessing the credibility and integrity of the information presented. Without a detailed breakdown of how funds are distributed and the specific institutions involved in these processes, it becomes increasingly difficult to gauge the effectiveness and transparency of the initiatives being discussed. Furthermore, the absence of supporting documentation raises concerns about accountability and may lead to skepticism among stakeholders who rely on accurate data to make informed decisions. This lack of clarity not only undermines trust but also hinders potential collaborative efforts aimed at improving outcomes for all parties involved.
3. Typographical and Factual Errors
The mention of “2061–17” instead of “2016–17” reflects negligence and a lack of due diligence, as such errors can lead to significant misunderstandings in documentation and reporting. This careless mistake not only raises concerns about the attention to detail but also undermines the credibility of the information being conveyed. In a professional setting, accuracy is paramount; therefore, failing to properly check dates can have repercussions, potentially affecting decision-making processes and the overall integrity of the project or analysis at hand. It is essential that all parties involved take the necessary steps to ensure that future references are accurate and reflect a commitment to professionalism and thoroughness.
4. Failure of FAA
The FAA did not rectify the deficiencies in the PIO’s reply, nor did he order corrective action, which raises significant concerns about the overall effectiveness and accountability of the agency. This lack of response not only undermines public trust but also suggests a potential pattern of negligence in addressing critical issues. Moreover, without a commitment to rectify these shortcomings, the agency risks perpetuating a cycle of inefficiency and ineffectiveness that could have serious implications for safety standards and operational integrity. It is essential for regulatory bodies to take decisive action when faced with deficiencies to ensure that they uphold their responsibilities to the public and the industry as a whole.
5. Non-Compliance with Section 4(1)(b)
MGKVP University failed to proactively disclose financial information, which is a statutory obligation. This lack of transparency not only violates established regulations but also leaves students and their families in a state of uncertainty regarding tuition fees and additional costs associated with their education. Such omissions can severely impact the financial planning of prospective students, turning what should be a straightforward process into a labyrinth of confusion and frustration. Furthermore, the failure to provide this essential information raises questions about the institution’s accountability and commitment to supporting its student body through clear communication and ethical practices.
Relief Sought
In light of the above, I respectfully request the Hon’ble Commission to:
- Initiate penal proceedings under Section 20(1) against the PIO for delay and misleading information.
- Recommend disciplinary action under Section 20(2) against the FAA for failing to act judiciously.
- Direct MGKVP University to furnish complete and accurate information as originally requested.
- Ensure compliance with Section 4(1)(b) regarding proactive disclosure of UGC fund utilization.
Conclusion
Transparency is the cornerstone of good governance. Through this second appeal, I aim to obtain the requested information that is crucial for fostering an informed citizenry. Access to information not only empowers individuals but also promotes accountability within public institutions. I also seek to uphold the spirit of the RTI Act, which was established to ensure that the machinery of the state remains open and accessible to the citizens it serves. Public authorities like MGKVP University must adhere to their legal obligations to provide timely and comprehensive responses. They must respect the citizen’s right to information, as this transparency helps build trust and strengthens the democratic process, ensuring that all stakeholders can engage meaningfully in civic matters.
Contact Information:
Yogi M. P. Singh
Mobile: 7379105911
Email: yogimpsingh@gmail.com
Address: Surekapuram Colony, Jabalpur Road, Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh – 231001
PIO, MGKVP University Varanasi is running away from providing information
Facing a similar challenge? Share the details in the box below, and our team of experts will do their best to help.