Adjudication is currently pending before the competent court of law regarding the impugned land. Moreover court trial is on. However, despite this legal pendency, the opposition party is attempting to forcibly grab the land through muscle power. Alarmingly, the local police are turning a blind eye to these unlawful activities, citing the matter as sub judice.

This raises a fundamental question: What is the meaning and purpose of a court trial if, in practice, rights are being determined not by judicial order but by brute force? In effect, the awaited decision of the court is being rendered meaningless, as the opposition seeks to supersede the authority of the judiciary through coercion and illegal possession.

Moreover, such inaction by the police not only undermines the rule of law but also emboldens lawbreakers to act with impunity. If this trend continues, it will erode public faith in the justice system and set a dangerous precedent where might prevails over right.

Therefore, it is imperative that the police uphold their constitutional duty to maintain status quo and prevent unlawful encroachments until the court delivers its verdict. Only then can the sanctity of judicial proceedings be preserved and justice be meaningfully served.

Registration Number	SPMZR/A/2025/60037
Name	Kamlesh Singh
Date of Filing	13/08/2025
Status	RTI APPEAL RECEVED as on 13/08/2025
FAA Details
FAA NAME	SOMEN VERMA
Designation	ssp mzp
Mobile	7007941679
Email	spmzr-up[at]nic[dot]in
Nodal Officer Details
Name	omprakash singh
Mobile	7007941679
Email	addlspopmzr[at]gmail[dot]com

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :-

* Public Authority	SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE MIRZAPUR

Personal Details:-

* Name	Kamlesh Singh
Gender	Male
* Address	Village Kothra Kantit, Post Sri Niwas Dham
Pincode	231313
State	Uttar Pradesh
Educational Status	Illiterate
Phone	Details not provided
Mobile	+91-8127195424
Email	myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Citizenship	Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ?	No

First Appeal Details u/s 19(1) :-

Registration Number	SPMZR/A/2025/60037
Date of Filing	13/08/2025
Concerned Appellate Authority	SOMEN VERMA
Mobile	XXXX View
Email	395
* Ground For Appeal	Provided Incomplete,Misleading or False Information
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

---

To
The First Appellate Authority (FAA)
Superintendent of Police, Mirzapur
PIN Code: 231001
Mobile: 9454400299
Email: spmzr-up@nic.in

Subject: First Appeal under Section 19(1) of the RTI Act, 2005 — Against Misleading and Incomplete Information Provided by PIO

Registration Number: SPMZR/R/2025/60189
Applicant: Kamlesh Singh
Date of Filing: 14/07/2025
Status: REQUEST DISPOSED OF as on 11/08/2025
PIO Name: Om Prakash Singh, ASP Operation
Mobile: 7007941679
Email: aspopmzp@gmail.com

Respected Sir,

I, Kamlesh Singh, resident of Village Kothra Kantit, Balua, Post Shree Nivas Dham, District Mirzapur, hereby submit this first appeal under Section 19(1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005, against the disposal of my RTI application dated 14/07/2025.

Although the PIO has claimed to have dispatched the remaining information to my postal address due to upload limitations, the reply provided online is vague, misleading, and fails to address the specific queries raised. Therefore, I seek your intervention to ensure transparency and accountability in the matter.

Grounds for Appeal:

1. Regarding Query 1:
   The Station House Officer, Jigna, had earlier assured that wire fencing would not be permitted on the disputed land. However, the opposite party proceeded with fencing.
   ➤ Transition: In light of this contradiction,
   the SHO must clarify the reasons for allowing wire fencing despite prior assurances. The PIO’s response does not address this critical lapse in enforcement.
2. Regarding Query 2:
   Stamp cases D202316530000370 and D2023165000370 were registered against the offenders for evading heavy stamp duty during land registry.
   ➤ Transition: Despite this,
   Jigna police facilitated illegal possession of the land, resulting in substantial loss to the public exchequer.
   ➤ Therefore,
   the status of recovery must be disclosed, as the police’s complicity in enabling possession raises serious concerns.
3. Regarding Query 3:
   The police had assured that status quo would be maintained, yet no FIR was registered against the offenders for land grabbing.
   ➤ Consequently,
   the reason for non-registration of FIR must be provided, especially when the assurance was documented in official communication.

Objections to PIO’s Reply:

• The summary report provided is arbitrary and lacks substantive information.
• It has been routinely used by Jigna police to mislead senior officers and aggrieved parties.
• The report fails to address any of the specific points raised in the RTI application.
• The Assistant Public Information Officer (APIO), Lalganj, has misled the appellant by forwarding this vague report.
• ➤ In conclusion,
  the reply amounts to a willful denial of information and violates the spirit of the RTI Act.

Prayer:

1. Kindly direct the PIO to furnish complete and point-wise information as sought in the original RTI application.
2. Please initiate disciplinary proceedings against the APIO, Lalganj, for providing misleading and arbitrary information, which undermines the transparency obligations of the police department.

I trust that your office will take appropriate action to uphold the integrity of the RTI process and ensure accountability within the police administration.

Date: 13/08/2025
Appellant:
Kamlesh Singh
Village-Kothra Kantit, Balua
Post- Shree Nivas Dham
District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh
Mobile: 8127195424

---

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

Registration Number	SPMZR/R/2025/60189
Date of Filing	14/07/2025
PIO of Public Authority approached	OM PRAKASH SINGH
Designation	ASP OPERATION
Mobile	7007941679
Email	aspopmzp[at]gmail[dot]com
PIO Order/Decision Number	Details not provided
* PIO Order/Decision Date

Kamlesh Singh’s Battle for Justice Over Land Grab

Uncovering Stamp Duty Theft: Kamlesh Singh’s Case

Electricity Theft Case: Kamlesh Singh’s Grievance Explained