Registration Number	SPMZR/A/2025/60036
Name	Kamlesh Singh
Date of Filing	10/08/2025
Status	RTI APPEAL RECEVED as on 10/08/2025
FAA Details
FAA NAME	SOMEN VERMA
Designation	ssp mzp
Mobile	7007941679
Email	spmzr-up[at]nic[dot]in
Nodal Officer Details
Name	omprakash singh
Mobile	7007941679
Email	addlspopmzr[at]gmail[dot]com

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :-

* Public Authority	SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE MIRZAPUR

Personal Details:-

* Name	Kamlesh Singh
Gender	Male
* Address	Village Kothra Kantit, Post Sri Niwas Dham
Pincode	231313
State	Uttar Pradesh
Educational Status	Illiterate
Phone	Details not provided
Mobile	+91-812719XXXX View
Email	myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Citizenship	Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ?	No

First Appeal Details u/s 19(1) :-

Registration Number	SPMZR/A/2025/60036
Date of Filing	10/08/2025
Concerned Appellate Authority	SOMEN VERMA
Mobile	XXXX View
Email	395
* Ground For Appeal	No Response Within the Time Limit
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

To

The Superintendent of Police
District – Mirzapur
PIN Code – 231001

Subject: First Appeal under Section 19(1) of the RTI Act, 2005 regarding Non-Response to RTI Application (Registration No. SPMZR/R/2025/60170)

Respected Sir,

I, Kamlesh Singh, hereby submit this appeal under subsection (1) of Section 19 of the Right to Information Act, 2005. This is in reference to my RTI application dated 04/07/2025. The application bears Registration Number SPMZR/R/2025/60170. The application was duly received on the same date, as per the online portal status. However, the stipulated time under Section 7(1) of the RTI Act has lapsed. The concerned Public Information Officer (PIO), Shri Om Prakash Singh, ASP Operation, Mirzapur, has not provided any response.

Grounds of Appeal:

1. Violation of Statutory Timeline:
   As per Section 7(1) of the RTI Act, the PIO must respond within 30 days. This period starts from the date of receipt of the application. However, more than 30 days have passed, and no reply has been furnished, thereby violating the statutory obligation.
2. Failure to Discharge Duty:
   The PIO has failed to entertain the RTI application. This failure amounts to a denial of the applicant’s right to information. It undermines the transparency objectives of the RTI Act.

Information Sought in the Original RTI Application:

1. Police Inaction Despite Emergency Call:
   The applicant’s son dialed 112 to report illegal boring activity, yet the offenders continued unabated. Kindly provide the documents or order notes. Include any instructions from a competent authority that restrained the police from taking action in this matter.
2. Sub Judice Matter and Police Stagnancy:
   The land in question is under judicial consideration. Despite this, the offenders are attempting to override the jurisdiction of the competent revenue court. Please clarify which legal provisions or departmental protocols justify the police’s passive stance in such a situation.
3. Details of Police Personnel at the Site:
   Kindly provide the names, designations, and posting details of the police personnel. They visited the site on the said date but failed to prevent the illegal boring activity.

Additional Submissions:

It is deeply concerning that the accused parties are attempting to take possession of the disputed land. This is happening while the matter is pending before the competent court. They are doing so by installing a bore. This not only undermines the authority of the judiciary but also renders the role of the Sub-District Magistrate ineffective. In such circumstances, the silence of the Jigana police raises serious questions about their moral and legal responsibility.

If the police allow such possession actions during the pendency of the case, it defeats the very purpose of judicial adjudication. The court’s decision becomes irrelevant if the status quo is not maintained. Therefore, I humbly urge your good office to intervene and uphold the rule of law by ensuring that no party takes unilateral action on disputed land.

Prayer:

In light of the above, I request you to:

• Direct the concerned PIO to furnish the requested information without further delay.
• Initiate appropriate action for the delay and non-compliance under the RTI Act.
• Ensure that the applicant is protected from unlawful actions and that the sanctity of the judicial process is preserved.

I look forward to your prompt and just intervention.

Sincerely,
Kamlesh Singh
Date: 10/08/2025
Address: Kothara Kantit, Shri Nivas Dham

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))	Supporting document not provided

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

Registration Number	SPMZR/R/2025/60170
Date of Filing	04/07/2025
PIO of Public Authority approached	OM PRAKASH SINGH
Designation	ASP OPERATION
Mobile	7007941679
Email	aspopmzp[at]gmail[dot]com
PIO Order/Decision Number	Details not provided
* PIO Order/Decision Date

RTI Appeal Against Lucknow Development Authority Delayed Response

RTI Appeal Against Delay in Mirzapur Social Welfare Response

Consumer Grievance Against Club High Sky: A Case Study

RTI Appeal: Delayed Responses at District Magistrate Office Mirzapur