This is a serious matter concerning the alleged misuse of public land and a lack of transparency in response to an RTI application. Consequently, the implications of these actions raise significant concerns about accountability and governance. For instance, one recent example, the Lions School RTI Appeal, highlights the necessity for scrutiny and openness in such cases. Therefore, authorities must address the allegations thoroughly and provide clear and comprehensive information to the public. Moreover, the Lions School RTI Appeal brings important questions to the forefront regarding how these issues are managed and disclosed by the government. Ultimately, transparency serves as a cornerstone of trust in any democratic society; when it is lacking, it breeds distrust and suspicion among citizens.

Moreover, the misuse of public land can have long-term impacts on the community, affecting the environment and local resources. Therefore, we must promptly investigate these claims to identify and rectify any wrongdoing, restoring faith in public institutions and their commitment to effectively serve the community.

Here is a structured blog post based on the details provided:

---

🦁 Alleged Land Scam and RTI Blockade in Mirzapur: The Lions Club School Controversy

The saga involving the Lions Club, the Mirzapur Municipality, and a prime piece of land leased for a pittance has, therefore, raised serious questions about public accountability, official complicity, as well as the sanctity of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005.

📍Lions School RTI Appeal: Public Land Misappropriation

The crux of the matter, in fact, revolves around a valuable parcel of municipality land located in the heart of Mirzapur City.

• Original Purpose: Initially, the government granted land lease to the Lions Club at a nominal rate of Rs. 50 per annum. Subsequently, the Lions Club intended to utilize it for gardening in order to effectively help develop children belonging to low-income families.
• Alleged Misuse: The Lions Club faces allegations that, in addition to the aforementioned issues, it constructed the ‘Lions School’ on this same land and subsequently used it for commercial activities, which clearly deviates from the non-profit, social purpose for which the land was originally sanctioned by the municipality.
• Financial Gravity: The appellant asserts that the land’s current market value is in the “billions of rupees,” which consequently makes the annual lease amount of Rs. 50 grossly inadequate, thereby suggesting deep-rooted corruption.
• Official Overlook: The Government of Uttar Pradesh allegedly granted the sanction for the lease while overlooking the viewpoints of the Mirzapur City Municipality board, which had reportedly decided to reclaim the land.

🚫 Lions School RTI Appeal: Escaping Accountability

Yogi M. P. Singh, a citizen, filed an RTI application to uncover the details, but the authorities have significantly delayed their response, prompting him to submit a First Appeal.

1. The Initial RTI Application (Lions School RTI Appeal)

Detail	Information
Registration Number	DOUDV/R/2025/60046
Date of Filing	02/02/2025
Public Authority	Urban Development Department
PIO Name	Ambrish Kumar Srivastava (Section Officer, NV-6)
Status (as of Appeal Date)	RTI REQUEST RECEIVED (No action taken)

2. Grounds for the First Appeal (Lions School RTI Appeal)

The appellant filed a First Appeal on 20/03/2025 (Registration Number: DOUDV/A/2025/60053), specifically stating:

• Violation of RTI Act, Section 7(1): Consequently, the Public Information Officer (PIO) failed to entertain the RTI application for over one and a half months, thereby violating the stipulated timeline for providing information.
• Suspected Corruption: The appellant suspects that the PIO is deliberately withholding information because “whatever the senior rank officers commit in extending the municipality lease land oriented towards corruption.”
• DIOS Complicity: The District Inspector of Schools (DIOS) actively escapes this matter; consequently, this indicates an official unwillingness to intervene in the school’s commercial operation on public land.

📢 Call for Action and Relief Sought (Lions School RTI Appeal)

The First Appeal is not merely a request; rather, it is a humble plea to the Appellate Authority, Mr. Sajeevan NV-6 (Deputy Secretary, Urban Development Department), urging him to take immediate and decisive action.

• Direct Information Disclosure: Consequently, direct the PIO to provide the requested information to the appellant at the earliest.
• Disciplinary Proceedings: Consequently, initiate disciplinary proceedings against the PIO, Ambrish Kumar Srivastava, for a blatant violation of subsection one of section 7 of the Right to Information Act, 2005, which significantly undermines the core principles of transparency and accountability.

---

This incident highlights the urgent need for robust checks and balances in the allotment and use of public assets, and firm enforcement of the RTI Act to curb corruption that is “growing like jungle fire.” The public awaits a transparent and accountable resolution to this critical issue.

---

Based on the details provided in your appeal form, here are the contact and application details for both the original RTI request and the First Appeal concerning the Lions Club land matter.

📝 RTI Application & Appeal Details

Detail Type	Original RTI Request (U/S 6(1))	First Appeal (U/S 19(1))
Registration Number	DOUDV/R/2025/60046 (Lions School RTI Appeal)	DOUDV/A/2025/60053
Date of Filing	02/02/2025	20/03/2025
Applicant Name	Yogi M P Singh	Yogi M P Singh
Applicant Mobile	+91-7379105911	+91-7379105911 (Provided in the source search)
Applicant Email	yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com	yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

---

📞 Public Authority & Appellate Contacts

Authority	PIO (for RTI Request DOUDV/R/2025/60046)	FAA (for First Appeal DOUDV/A/2025/60053)
Name	Ambrish Kumar Srivastava	Sajeevan NV-6
Designation	Section Officer (NV-6) (Lions School RTI Appeal)	Deputy Secretary (NV-6)
Phone No.	9454419927	9454413781
Email ID	sonagarvikas6@gmail.com	nagarvikassection6@gmail.com
Concerned Department	Urban Development Department, Uttar Pradesh	Urban Development Department, Uttar Pradesh

The department lists the Nodal Officer as SAJIVAN; furthermore, you can conveniently reach them via email at so.nagarvikas8@gmail.com.

---

🌐 Web Link for Status Tracking

You can track the status of your RTI Appeal (DOUDV/A/2025/60053) on the official RTI Online Portal of the Government of Uttar Pradesh; furthermore, this platform provides real-time updates and relevant information to assist you throughout the process.

• RTI Online (UP Govt.) Status Link: https://rtionline.up.gov.in/request/status.php

To track the status, you will typically need to enter:

1. Your Registration Number (e.g., DOUDV/A/2025/60053).
2. Your Email ID (yogimpsingh@gmail.com).
3. The Captcha code. (Lions School RTI Appeal)

Since you filed your First Appeal on March 20, 2025, and received no response, you may be approaching or may have already filed a Second Appeal to the Uttar Pradesh Information Commission (UPIC).

The Chief Information Commissioner (CIC) or an Information Commissioner (IC) can face action as outlined in the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005. Notably, this process is designed to protect their independence, similarly to how the Supreme Court judges undergo a removal process. (Lions School RTI Appeal)

The key authority for removal, therefore, is the President of India (for Central Information Commission) or, on the other hand, the Governor (for State Information Commission).3

---

1. ⚖️ Removal on Grounds of Proved Misbehaviour or Incapacity

This is, without a doubt, the most stringent mechanism; consequently, it requires a judicial inquiry.

Mechanism (Lions School RTI Appeal)

1. **Reference to Supreme Court: Consequently, the **President (for CIC) or the **Governor (for SIC) refers the matter of **proved misbehaviour or **incapacity to the Supreme Court of India for an inquiry.
2. Suspension During Inquiry: The President/Governor can suspend the Commissioner from office or prohibit them from attending the office until final orders appropriate authority passes.
3. Supreme Court Inquiry: Consequently, the Supreme Court conducts an inquiry into the allegations. (Lions School RTI Appeal)
4. Final Removal Order: If the Supreme Court, after the inquiry, upholds the cause of removal and advises so, the President/Governor must then issue an order for the removal of the Commissioner.⁸

---

2. ⚡️ Removal for Specific Statutory Conditions

The President or Governor can remove a Commissioner by order without the Supreme Court inquiry if the Commissioner: (Lions School RTI Appeal)

1. Is adjudged an insolvent (bankrupt).¹⁰
2. Has been convicted of an offence which, in the opinion of the President/Governor, involves moral turpitude.¹¹
3. Engages during their term of office in any paid employment outside the duties of their office.¹²
4. Is, in the opinion of the President/Governor, unfit to continue in office by reason of infirmity of mind or body. (Lions School RTI Appeal)
5. Has acquired such financial or other interest as is likely to affect prejudicially their functions as a Commissioner (Conflict of Interest).¹⁴

Note: An Information Commissioner is also deemed guilty of misbehaviour if they are concerned or interested in any contract or agreement made by or on behalf of the Government, or participate in the profit thereof, other than as a member and in common with other members of an incorporated company.¹⁵

---

3. 🎯 Who Initiates Action (Complaint Mechanism) (Lions School RTI Appeal)

While the removal process is handled by the executive head (President/Governor) and the judiciary (Supreme Court), a citizen who is aggrieved by the functioning of the Commission may file a complaint.

• Furthermore, a formal complaint against an Information Commissioner’s general conduct or failure to act (such as persistent non-disposal of cases) can be addressed to the President of India (for the CIC) or the Governor (for the SIC), depending on the Commission involved. (Lions School RTI Appeal)
• This complaint would form the basis for the government to initiate the formal removal process, if the allegations meet the statutory grounds for removal.