Here are the key takeaways from the blog post regarding the legal battle of Smt. Archana Dubey. This case is a compelling example of unmasking police dereliction as it unfolded.

1. Systematic Reclassification of Crime 📉

• The core issue is the police’s decision. They rebranded a daylight robbery involving ₹8 lakh of gold as a “family property dispute”.
• By labelling the incident as “civil in nature,” the authorities avoided registering a criminal FIR for robbery or house-breaking.
• The police decided against criminal prosecution. Instead, they opted for preventive action under Sections 126/135 of the BNSS. This approach treats the victim and the accused as equal threats to peace.

2. Alleged Suppression of Critical Evidence 📹 (Unmasking Police Dereliction)

• A major point of contention is a video recording. A Police Constable allegedly arrived from Fataha Chowki during the incident.
• Despite this direct evidence, the official police inquiry claimed that “no evidence” was provided to confirm the robbery.
• The RTI response was criticized for being evasive regarding the name of this Constable and the location of the footage.

3. Legal and Procedural Violations ⚖️(Unmasking Police Dereliction)

• The blog highlights a violation of the Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P. mandate, which requires an immediate FIR for any “cognizable offense”.
• The police report allegedly focused on the ownership of the ancestral house. It ignored the grievous assault reported on a pregnant woman.
• The RTI process was used as a tool for “institutional gaslighting.” The PIO provided vague summaries. They directed the applicant to a website rather than providing specific documents.

4. The Path to Accountability 📩

• Archana Dubey has formally challenged these findings by filing a First Appeal (SPMZR/A/2026/60013).
• The appeal is currently before the SSP of Mirzapur, Somen Verma, who serves as the First Appellate Authority.
• The sought relief includes the release of video evidence. It also includes witness statements from Krishna Pandey and the internal file notings used to dismiss the criminal charges.
• (Unmasking Police Dereliction)

Justice Delayed: Unmasking Police Dereliction and the “Civil Dispute” Trap in Mirzapur ⚖️

In the heart of Uttar Pradesh, a harrowing tale of daylight robbery has emerged. This case raises fundamental questions about the Rule of Law and the safety of women. The struggle of Smt. Archana Dubey is not merely a family disagreement. Instead, it serves as a study in how justice can be manipulated through procedural gymnastics. Consequently, the machinery of law appears to shield offenders while silencing the victim. ⚠️ In this context, unmasking the dereliction by police is vital to understanding the depth of injustice.

---

1. The Incident: From Robbery to “Family Matter” 🏠

On October 24, 2025, a calculated crime occurred in Gharhu Patti, Mirzapur. While the applicant was away, a group allegedly broke into her residence. They committed a daylight robbery of gold jewelry worth approximately ₹8 lakh. Furthermore, they reportedly stole various high-value household appliances^. The pattern of police dereliction must be unmasked in such situations of criminal activity.

However, the local police narrative shifted significantly when the victim sought help. Despite reports of House-breaking (BNS Sec 329), the official inquiry recharacterized the event. Specifically, the Circle Officer (CO) City labeled it a “property partition dispute” between brothers. By calling a heist a “civil matter,” the police effectively blocked a criminal investigation. 🚫 This is a classic example where Unmasking Police Dereliction is necessary for public awareness.

2. The Smoking Gun: Suppressed Video Evidence 📹

The most egregious aspect of this case is the alleged suppression of evidence. A representation was sent to the Hon’ble Chief Minister. It stated that a Police Constable from Fataha Chowki was present at the crime scene. Moreover, he actually recorded a videography of the entire event^. Clearly, police dereliction must be unmasked to ensure justice prevails.

Archana Dubey used the RTI Act to seek a certified copy of this footage. Nevertheless, the response from the Public Information Officer (PIO) was tellingly evasive. The PIO claimed that “no evidence” was found to support her allegations. This creates a massive credibility gap for the department. Specifically, how can the police claim a lack of evidence when their own officer filmed the act? 🔍 It is crucial to focus on Unmasking Police Dereliction when such inconsistencies arise.

3. The “Lalita Kumari” Mandate vs. Local Practice ⚖️

The Supreme Court of India established a clear mandate in the Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P. case. It ruled that if a complaint discloses a cognisable offence, an FIR is mandatory^. In failing to act, the police’s dereliction must be unmasked to uphold court orders.

In this instance, the robbery of ₹8 lakh clearly constitutes such an offense. Yet, the police chose a “Preliminary Inquiry” instead of immediate registration. Subsequently, they initiated preventive action under Sections 126/135 of the BNSS. This “Challani” report treats the victim and the victimisers as equal threats to peace. Consequently, it minimises the crime and denies the victim her right to a fair trial. 💰 Unmasking Police Dereliction in such procedural matters is indispensable for true justice.

4. Institutional Gaslighting: The RTI Struggle 📄

When Archana Dubey sought transparency, the response was filled with bureaucratic obfuscation. For example, the PIO provided a general summary instead of actual witness transcripts^. In scenarios like this, unmasking police dereliction can help expose administrative barriers.

• Witness Statements: The applicant requested the exact words of Krishna Pandey and the Constable. However, the PIO failed to provide these detailed records. 🗣️ Focusing on Unmasking Police Dereliction reveals how such omissions undermine accountability.
• Vague Directions: Regarding DGP Standing Orders, the PIO simply told her to “check the website”. This violates the spirit of the RTI Act, which requires providing held information. 💻 By unmasking the pattern of police dereliction, such responses are brought to the forefront.
• Ignoring the Assault: The inquiry report skimmed over the grievous assault on a pregnant woman. Instead, it focused almost entirely on the house’s ownership status. This demonstrates that Unmasking Police Dereliction is essential to addressing institutional failures.

5. The Path Forward: The First Appeal 📩

Unwilling to accept this miscarriage of justice, Archana Dubey filed a First Appeal (SPMZR/A/2026/60013). She submitted this before the Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP), Somen Verma. Her appeal demands specific actions to correct the record. Unmasking police dereliction is closely linked with pursuing remedies in the appeals system.

1. A certified copy of the constable’s video footage. 🎞️ Making such requests is a step towards unmasking any police dereliction present.
2. The full recorded statements of all key witnesses. ✍️ These documented facts help in the task of unmasking dereliction within police ranks.
3. The file notings showing how the robbery was dismissed as a “civil matter”. 📂 Procedural transparency is vital to unmask police dereliction and restore trust.

Conclusion: A Test for the Mirzapur Police 🛡️

The case of Archana Dubey is a litmus test for the Mirzapur Police. Will they finally uphold the Rule of Law? Or will they continue to hide behind “civil dispute” excuses? ⚖️ Thus, the challenge of unmasking police dereliction hangs over this inquiry.

Justice cannot be served through “preventive reports” when life-saving information is stolen. It requires registering an FIR and preserving video evidence. Ultimately, the administration’s eyes are now on the First Appellate Authority to rectify this failure. ✅ Now is the time for unmasking police dereliction, so that faith in local law enforcement might be restored.

Based on the documents provided, here are the application IDs, email addresses, mobile numbers, and web link details for the concerned public authorities and the applicant’s filings:

1. Application and Reference IDs (Unmasking Police Dereliction)

• RTI Application Registration Number: SPMZR/R/2026/60056.
• RTI First Appeal Registration Number: SPMZR/A/2026/60013.
• PG Portal (Government of India) Reference Number: 60000260008750.
• Grievance Number: GOVUP/E/2026/0003751.
• Police Case/FIR Number: मु0अ0सं0-188/25.
• Charge Sheet Number: ए-164/25.
• General Diary (GD) / Challani Report Number: 036 dated 01/01/2026.

2. Concerned Public Authorities & Officers (Unmasking Police Dereliction)

Role / Designation	Name	Mobile Number	Email Address
First Appellate Authority (SSP Mirzapur)	Somen Verma	947356XXXX	spmzr-up@nic.in
PIO / ASP Operation	Manish Kumar Mishra	9473567333	aspopmzp@gmail.com
Nodal Officer	Manish Kumar Mishra	9473567333	addlspopmzr@gmail.com
Circle Officer (CO) City	Vivek Jawala	9454401590	Not provided
Investigating Officer (SI)	Sanjay Singh	7659-8096320	Not provided
Sub-Inspector (SI)	Dayashankar Ojha	Not provided	Not provided

3. Web Link Details (Unmasking Police Dereliction)

• Jansunwai-Samadhan Portal (UP): https://jansunwai.up.nic.in.
• Jansunwai Mobile App (Google Play): https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=in.nic.up.jansunwai.upjansunwai.
• Official Police Contact Email (as cited by applicant): spmzr-up@nic.in.

4. Applicant Details

• Name: Archana Dubey.
• Email: archanadubeymzp1995@gmail.com.
• Alternate Email: myogimpsingh@gmail.com.
• Mobile: 8840098979.

Would you like me to draft a reminder email to the First Appellate Authority (SSP) regarding your appeal? ✅