Registration NumberDNLKO/A/2025/60001
NameYogi M P Singh
Date of Filing11/01/2025
StatusRTI APPEAL RECEIVED as on 11/01/2025
  Nodal Officer Details  
NameSHIVENDRA MISHRA
Email-IDchief.shivendra@gmail.com

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :-
  
* Public AuthorityDistrict Court Lucknow
  
Personal Details:-
* NameYogi M P Singh
GenderMale
* AddressMohalla Surekapuram colony , Shri Laxmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir, Riva Road, Mirzapur city
Pincode231001
StateUttar Pradesh
Educational StatusLiterate
Phone Number-7379105911
Mobile Number+91-7379105911
Email-IDyogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
CitizenshipIndian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ?No
First Appeal Details u/s 19(1) :-
Registration NumberDNLKO/A/2025/60001
Date of Filing11/01/2025
Concerned Appellate AuthorityNodal Officer
Phone NoDetails not provided
Email IdDetails not provided
* Ground For AppealRefused access to Information Requested
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Prayer or Relief SoughtSought information by the appellant -CPIO District court Lucknow may provide the copy of the notings made by the accountable staff of district court Lucknow on the representation dated 13th october 2019 Which is not the integral part of court proceedings Case Number : Cri. Case/4003282/2011. Most respected Sir, Central Public Information Officer in district court Lucknow rejected the RTI application of the information seeker as follows. Registration Number DNLKO/R/2024/60060 Name Yogi M P Singh Date of Filing 13/12/2024 Status REQUEST REJECTED as on 04/01/2025 Reason for Rejection :- Rule 25 of the Allahabad High Court (Right to Information) Rules, 2006. According to section 25 of Allahabad High Court (Right to Information) Rules, 2006, Central Public Information Officer shall not be liable to provide any information, which can be obtained under the provision of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 in case of High Court and under General Rule (Civil/Criminal) in case of subordinate Courts. Such information may be obtained by adhering to the prescribed procedure and payment of fees prescribed in the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952, or General Rules (Civil/Criminal), as the case may be. Whatever procedure you have told the applicant is applicable in the cases pending before the courts whether it may be high court of judicature or it may be lower courts. Most respected sir, the appellant is seeking information as-CPIO District court Lucknow may provide the copy of the notings made by the accountable staff of district court Lucknow on the representation dated 13th october 2019 Which is not the integral part of court proceedings Case Number : Cri. Case/4003282/2011. It has been categorically expressed by the appellant in the rti application that notings sought made on the aforementioned communication not The part of any paper book of case pending or disposed of in the Court of law. Thus the rejection of the RTI application by the central public information officer is arbitrary, unconstitutional and against the spirit of the provisions of right to information act 2005. The matter concerns the serious irregularities and violation of the order passed by the Lucknow bench of high court of Judicature at Allahabad which is the root cause concerned judicial members are running away from making any comments in the matter. The Right to information act 2005 was introduced by the government of India to promote transparency and accountability in the working of the public authorities but it could not achieve its objective even after 19 years of implementation. This is a humble request of the appellant to the most respected sir to direct the central public information officer to provide the information to the appellant at the earliest in accordance with the law.
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))
RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-
Registration NumberDNLKO/R/2024/60060
Date of Filing13/12/2024
PIO of Public Authority approachedAnurodh Mishra
DesignationSpl. Judge (C.B.I.Court No.2)
Phone No8127848760
Email Idanurodhmishra2011@gmail.com
PIO Order/Decision NumberDetails not provided
* PIO Order/Decision Date

3 responses to “Understanding RTI Appeals: A Case Study of Lucknow District Court”

  1. Right to information act 2005 was introduced by the government of India to promote transparency and accountability in the working of the public authorities but even after 19 years no information is being provided by Public information Officers to the citizens in the state. There are no value of rules and provisions of law in the state of Uttar Pradesh.

  2. Arun Pratap Singh avatar
    Arun Pratap Singh


    Here this question arises that why is Central Public Information Officer running away from providing the information to the information Seeker concerning the working of the public authority which is non judicial work. Where is the honesty in the working of the lower judiciary and transparency and accountability?

  3. Think about the gravity of situation The applicant is seeking notings on his representation which was sent by him through the registered post but concerned are running away from providing any information because they have not taken any action in the matter. Where is the sense of accountability in judiciary.

Facing a similar challenge? Share the details in the box below, and our team of experts will do their best to help.

  1. Preeti Singh's avatar
  2. Shri Krishna Tripathi's avatar
  3. Arun Pratap Singh's avatar
  4. Yogi M. P. Singh's avatar
  5. Search youself's avatar

Discover more from Yogi-human rights defender

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading