Introduction: CBI Investigation Demand & Government

Explore the challenges involved in filing a CBI Investigation Demand and obtaining a government response regarding complex cybercrimes in India, including jurisdictional issues, technical complexity, the collection and preservation of digital evidence, coordination among multiple law-enforcement agencies, delays in administrative and legal procedures, concerns about data privacy, and the need to establish a clear connection between the alleged offenses, responsible individuals, and broader public interest.

CBI Investigation Demand & Government Evasion: How Bureaucracy Shields a Multi-Crore Syndicate

At present, India promotes digital governance and fast grievance redressal. However, victims of complex cybercrimes still face huge hurdles. Furthermore, local police often cannot act when a criminal network operates across state borders. Consequently, in these cases, citizens raise a formal CBI Investigation Demand & Government action becomes essential. Nevertheless, administrative delays and official evasion frequently trap victims in an endless loop.

For example, the case of Yogi M. P. Singh from Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, clearly highlights this systemic problem. Specifically, he is fighting a ₹54.70+ crore identity theft syndicate. In addition, he must also fight bureaucratic apathy in the Chief Minister’s Office and technical flaws in grievance portals.

CBI Investigation Demand & Government Action: The Identity Theft Syndicate

To begin with, one must look at the scale of the crime. Indeed, a public CBI Investigation Demand & Government oversight grew after a criminal network stole and misused the victim’s Permanent Account Number (PAN).

According to a progress report on FIR No. 0291/2023 by the Mirzapur Police, at least 70 criminals misused this single PAN. They set up fake businesses, claimed illegal tax deductions, and committed financial fraud across Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Karnataka, and Tamil Nadu.

In response, local police created a Special Investigation Team (SIT). However, a district cyber cell cannot easily conduct interstate raids or access banking and tax data across different states.

CBI Investigation Demand & Government Jurisdiction: Cross-Border Chaos

Meanwhile, delays in starting a central investigation cause severe harm to the victim. Because the network spans multiple states, local departments treat the victim like the criminal.

In September 2026, the Tamil Nadu Commercial Taxes Department sent a notice demanding ₹1.16 crore. The notice targeted a fake firm named “Veer Enterprises” in Chennai, which used the victim’s stolen PAN.

Consequently, the State Bank of India in Mirzapur froze the victim’s personal savings account. The account held under ₹4,000, which was needed for family medical care. As a result, an innocent citizen faces financial distress while 70 suspects remain free.

The Legal Bottleneck: CBI Investigation Demand & Government Mandate

Because the crime covers Chennai, Patna, Bangalore, and Mirzapur, only the CBI has the authority to investigate fully. Even so, the CBI cannot take over without official state approval.

Under the Delhi Special Police Establishment (DSPE) Act, 1946, law and order belong to the states. Therefore, the CBI requires official consent from the State Home Department to investigate within state borders.

In fact, local police recognize this limit clearly. Specifically, on August 19, 2026, the Circle Officer (Operations) of Mirzapur stated in writing that district police cannot transfer a case to the CBI. Instead, the request must happen at the state government level.

CBI Investigation Demand & Government Evasion: The Administrative Ping-Pong

Nevertheless, higher authorities continue to delay action. Specifically, after local police confirmed their limits, the victim submitted petitions to the Chief Minister’s Secretariat and the Prime Minister’s Office through the CPGRAMS portal.

The petition was clear: Send this file to the Principal Secretary (Home) to approve a CBI probe. Do not send it back to local police.

In response, officials closed grievances like GOVUP/E/2026/0135180 and PMOPG/E/2026/0199125 with a standard note: “Disposed at subordinate level.”

By sending state-level requests back to district officers who lack authority, officials avoid taking responsibility. Thus, this process protects the financial syndicate from a full central investigation.

Digital Irony: When Grievance Portals Become Blockades

In addition, technical issues in the online portal create more obstacles. When the victim tried to read the reply documents, the CPGRAMS portal showed an error: “You are not authorized to view this resource / resource not found.”

As a result, this error prevents citizens from viewing official decisions. Ultimately, it reduces transparency and makes it harder for victims to challenge government inaction in court.

Forcing Accountability: The Right to Information and the Courts

Because administrative routes stalled, the victim turned to legal remedies. Therefore, he filed a Right to Information (RTI) application (Registration: DOCMO/R/2026/61414) with the Chief Minister’s Office.

Specifically, the RTI asks three key questions:

1. Under what specific statutory rule did the CM Secretariat delegate a CBI consent request to a district-level officer who lacks the authority to grant it?
2. Who were the specific officials that ignored the explicit request to route the file to the Home Department?
3. Where is the physical copy of the investigation report that the CPGRAMS portal is currently blocking?

In the meantime, if the RTI response is unsatisfactory, the victim plans to file a Writ of Mandamus in the High Court. Consequently, this legal order would compel the Principal Secretary (Home) to review the CBI transfer request directly instead of delegating it to local police.

Conclusion: CBI Investigation Demand & Government Reform

In summary, Yogi M. P. Singh’s case shows clear gaps in the grievance redressal system for major cyber crimes.

Currently, criminals move quickly across state lines, while state procedures move slowly. Without prompt central intervention, interstate networks will continue to operate with minimal interference.

Therefore, the Chief Minister’s Office must recognize local police limits and refer this ₹54.70 crore case to the CBI.

Reference Directory: Public Authorities and Application IDs

For reference, below is the verified list of application IDs, grievance references, official contacts, and portal links relevant to this systemic failure, compiled for public record and accountability.

CBI Investigation Demand & Government Tracking IDs

• UP State Grievance: GOVUP/E/2026/0135180 (Closed: 10/11/2026)
• PMO Grievance: PMOPG/E/2026/0199125 (Closed: 10/11/2026)
• Previous DoPT Grievance: DOPAT/E/2026/0009037
• RTI Application Registration: DOCMO/R/2026/61414 (Filed: 11/11/2026)
• Core Police Case: FIR No. 0291/2023 (P.S. Kotwali Katra, Mirzapur, UP)

Concerned Public Authorities & Contact Information

1. Chief Minister’s Secretariat, Government of Uttar Pradesh

• Responsible Officer: Shri Bhaskar Chandra Kandpal, Joint Secretary
• Address: Chief Minister Secretariat, Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow, UP – 226001
• Email: bhaskar.31532@gov.in
• Phone/Contact: 0522-2226350

2. RTI Officials – UP Chief Minister’s Office

• Public Information Officer (PIO): Pradeep Kumar (Section Officer, L.S. Sec-1)
  • Email: pradip.11743@gov.in
  • Mobile/Phone: 9454411743
• Nodal Officer:
  • Email: manish.21320@gov.in
  • Mobile/Phone: 9554417327

3. Tamil Nadu Commercial Taxes Department

• Authority: Assistant Commissioner (ST), Kundrathur Assessment Circle
• Email: ackundrathur.ctd@tn.gov.in

Official Web Portals

• Centralized Public Grievance Redress and Monitoring System (CPGRAMS): https://pgportal.gov.in/
• RTI Online Portal: https://rtionline.gov.in/

Related Posts: CBI Investigation Demand & Government

• CBI Investigation Demanded in PAN Identity Theft Case
• CBI & Income Tax Corruption: A Serious Concern
• Shielding a Syndicate in India: A Major Issue
• CBI Investigation in Tax Fraud: Key Developments
• CBI Tax Evasion & Corruption in India Explained