Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Sita Devi
Date of Receipt
16/07/2024
Received By Ministry/Department
Uttar Pradesh
Grievance Description
The matter concerns the working of the sub-divisional magistrate Sadar, due to irrational dealings of the staff of tehsil Sadar judgement passed by the most respected civil court is going to be meaningless.
ORDER- This order is unilaterally issued against the defendants in this manner that the defendants are prohibited through this order that they should not create any kind of disturbance in the possession, ownership and possession of the land A, B, C, D and the houses, sitting room, well, tree etc. and courtyard land situated therein and neither demolish the houses, rooms, well, temple etc. nor do any construction.
Date: 16.10.2015
(Jyotsna Yadav) ad 16/10/15
Additional Civil Judge (Judiciary) First, Mirzapur. Court No.-13:
Today this decision was pronounced in open court by me under my signature
Date: 16.10.2015
Additional Civil Judge (Judiciary) First Mirzapur. Court No.-13.
(Jyotsana Yadav) 16/10/15
Court Additional Civil Judge (Judiciary), First Mirzapur. Court No.-13 Present: Jyotsna Yadav, Uttar Pradesh Judicial Service.
Original Case No.-659 of 1991
2. Mukhu age about 45 years - deceased
2/1. Sita Devi age about 45 years widow of Mukhu
2/2. Lal Bahadur age about 16 years, son of Mukhu
2/3. Vijay Bahadur age about 14 years, son of Mukhu, 2/4. Bihari Lal alias Munnu age about 12 years, son of Mukhu
2/5. Somaru Bargr about 10 years
2/6. Lavkushal age about 6 years
All minor sons of late Mukhu through guardian Sita Devi mother of minor son from 2/2 to 2/6
Plaintiffs
Vs
Kallu age about 40 years son Metal resident Nakhara Tappa 84 and District Mirzapur. Pargana Kantit Tehsil
Defendants
Ex parte decision -
The suit presented by the plaintiffs has been instituted for permanent injunction against the defendant.
Short submissions of the applicant are as follows.
1- During the pendency of litigation the defendant sold this sub judice land to Rakesh S/O Jokhan resident of same address which was illegal.
2- On the basis of the record of the registry Rakesh S/O Jokhan creates disturbance which is not only illegal but also constituted contempt of court.
3-lis pendens- under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act. This Latin term means pending litigation and refers to the principle that any property involved in a lawsuit cannot be transferred or otherwise dealt with by any party to the suit while the litigation is ongoing.
4- The main purpose of this doctrine is to prevent one party from undermining the legal process by transferring the property in question, which could complicate or prolong the litigation.
5- At present, the title has been decided by the most respected court in favour of the applicant and then the claim of the illegal claimant constitutes the contempt of court and whoever supporting the stand are also constituting the contempt of court so action must be taken against the illegal claimant.
The decision of the most respected court is attached to the grievance in the form of PDF document. This is a humble request of the applicant to most respected sir to take action on the representation of the applicant so that rule of law must be followed.
Grievance Document
Current Status
Grievance received
Date of Action
16/07/2024
Officer Concerns To
Forwarded to
Uttar Pradesh
Officer Name
Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)
Organisation name
Uttar Pradesh
Contact Address
Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address
bhaskar.12214@gov.in
Contact Number
05222226350
There must be compliance of the order passed by the civil court in the matter so that subsequent dispute may not arise in the matter because of clear cut judgement passed by the concerned magistrate.
ReplyDelete