Sir, Honourable commission passed the order in the complaint of Sri Tanveer Ahmad Siddiqui dated 29.03.2023.as Perused the complaint of Sri Tanveer Ahmad Siddiqui dated 29.03.2023. It appears that the complainant is an accused in case crime no 0035/2023 of Police Station Kaiserbagh District Lucknow. Factual position is that the matter does not concern Sri Tanveer Ahmad Siddiqui quite obvious from the following facts. For crime number and other details, vide attached document to the petition.Diary No 1188/IN/2023 Case / File No 1085/24/4/2023
Victim Name SAURABH SINGH ALIAS RAJAN SINGH Registration Date 03/04/2023
Dismissed in Limini on 10/04/2023
Herein the complainant details are as follows.Name YOGI M P SINGH
Address SUREKAPURAM COLONY , SHRI LAXMI NARAYAN BAIKUNTH MAHADEV MANDIR, RIVA ROAD
District MIRZAPUR State UTTAR PRADESH ( 231001 )
The victim details are as follows. Name SAURABH SINGH ALIAS RAJAN SINGH Gender Male
Religion Hindu Caste General
Address SARAIJEET RAY URF PUREBHAWA , THANA MAUAIMA, POST GHEENPUR
District PRAYAGRAJ (ALLAHABAD) State UTTAR PRADESH
Moreover, the matter does not concern case crime no 0035/2023 of Police Station Kaiserbagh District Lucknow as quoted in the following order by the Honourable member of the Honourable commission. Therefore, direct the concerned staff to correct the blunder made in compiling the order by the concerned staff in the interest of justice.
.SHRC, Uttar Pradesh, Case Details, Diary No 1188/IN/2023 Case / File No 1085/24/4/2023
Victim Name SAURABH SINGH ALIAS RAJAN SINGH Registration Date 03/04/2023
Dismissed in Limini on 10/04/2023
Action : Dismissed in Limini, Action Date 10/04/2023
Proceeding- Perused the complaint of Sri Tanveer Ahmad Siddiqui dated 29.03.2023.
It appears that the complainant is an accused in case crime no 0035/2023 of Police Station Kaiserbagh District Lucknow. He alleges that he has been falsely implicated in the aforesaid case. The issue regarding the innocence of the complainant cannot be decided by the Commission as the same falls within the domain of investigation. There is no allegation in the complaint that the case is not being investigated fairly.
If the complainant has any grievance against the S.H.O. of Police Station of Mauaima he may approach the Police Commissioner, Prayagraj who shall look into the matter and pass an appropriate order.
In view of the above I do not find any reason to interfere in the matter.
The complaint is hereby rejected.
Comments
Post a Comment
Your view points inspire us