Additional S.P. /PIO and FAA/S.P. are performing zero role consequently there is anarchy in compliance of provisions of RTI Act 2005
Registration Number SPMZR/A/2022/60011
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 21/07/2022
Status APPEAL DISPOSED OF as on 28/07/2022
Reply :- answer to yogi mp singh
View Document
Nodal Officer Details
Name AJAY KUMAR SINGH
Telephone Number 9454401105
Email-ID addlspopmzr@gmail.com
Online RTI Appeal Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
* Public Authority SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE MIRZAPUR
Personal Details:-
* Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, District Mirzapur
Pincode 231001
State Uttar Pradesh
Educational Status Literate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
First Appeal Details u/s 19(1) :-
Registration Number SPMZR/A/2022/60011
Date of Filing 21/07/2022
Concerned Appellate Authority AJAY KUMAR SINGH
Phone No 05442252578
Email Id spmzr-up@nic.in
* Ground For Appeal Refused access to Information Requested
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Prayer or Relief Sought Registration Number SPMZR/R/2022/60019 Name Yogi M P Singh Date of Filing 11-05-2022, For more information, vide attached documents. It is 21 July 2022 today and appellant received the communication dated 19 July 2022 of denial of information sent by assistant public information officer / circle officer city Mr. Prabhat Ray attached to documents. Aforementioned APIO denied the sought information by taking the recourse of subsection 1 of section 11 of the Right to Information Act 2005 which is categorically stated as follows. Where a Central Public Information Officer or a State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, intends to disclose any information or record, or part thereof on a request made under this Act, which relates to or has been supplied by a third party and has been treated as confidential by that third party, the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, shall, within five days from the receipt of the request, give a written notice to such third party of the request and of the fact that the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, intends to disclose the information or record, or part thereof, and invite the third party to make a submission in writing or orally, regarding whether the information should be disclosed, and such submission of the third party shall be kept in view while taking a decision about disclosure of information: Provided that except in the case of trade or commercial secrets protected by law, disclosure may be allowed if the public interest in disclosure outweighs in importance any possible harm or injury to the interests of such third party. Here the matter is tetra polar. 1-Uttar Pradesh Human Rights Commission Lucknow. 2-Police 3-Complainant and 4-Victim Here complainant has sought information to be instrumental in providing justice to victim. Moreover, complainant has instituted the case before Uttar Pradesh Human Rights Commission Lucknow.against the police. It is legal right of the complainant and victim both to know the outcome of complaint in reasoned way. Since the police has abused its post and position therefore it is concealing the report from complainant and victim by falsely taking recourse of third party information. It is obligatory duty of police under principal of natural law to provide copy of submissions made before Uttar Pradesh Human Rights Commission Lucknow to complainant so that subsequent proceedings in the matter be made by the complainant.
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))
RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-
Registration Number SPMZR/R/2022/60019
Date of Filing 11/05/2022
PIO of Public Authority approached Nodal Officer
Designation Details not provided
Phone No Details not provided
Email Id Details not provided
PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided
* PIO Order/Decision Date
Moreover, complainant has instituted the case before Uttar Pradesh Human Rights Commission Lucknow.against the police. It is legal right of the complainant and victim both to know the outcome of complaint in reasoned way. Since the police has abused its post and position therefore it is concealing the report from complainant and victim by falsely taking recourse of third party information. It is obligatory duty of police under principal of natural law to provide copy of submissions made before Uttar Pradesh Human Rights Commission Lucknow to complainant so that subsequent proceedings in the matter be made by the complainant.
ReplyDeleteThink about the gravity of situation that the first appellate authority is the superintendent of police district Mirzapur but he did not entertain this appeal submitted by the appellant which is a mockery of The Right to Information act 2005.
ReplyDelete