JUDICIAL OFFICERS IN DISTRICT COURT having no regard for R.T.I. Act 2005 so appeal made against additional district judge Lucknow
Grivance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2022/10014
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt
02/03/2022
Received By Ministry/Department
Uttar Pradesh
Grievance Description
The matter concerns the lawlessness and anarchy in the office of the district judge Lucknow where rule of law is always overlooked by the accountable public functionaries. Following appeal submitted before the district judge Lucknow was delivered by the department of post on 28 Jan 2022 and today is 02 March 2022. Which means 30 days passed but district judge Lucknow did not take any action in the matter consequently violated Subsection 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005.
Subsection 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005 states as
Any person who, does not receive a decision within the time specified in
sub-section (1) or clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 7, or is aggrieved by a decision of the Central
Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, may within thirty days
from the expiry of such period or from the receipt of such a decision prefer an appeal to such officer who
is senior in rank to the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer as the case
may be, in each public authority:
Provided that such officer may admit the appeal after the expiry of the period of thirty days if he or
she is satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from filing the appeal in time.
An appeal under subsection 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005 against the denial of information from point 1 to 3 by the central public information officer / Additional district Judge through its representative / agent Human Rights Defender Yogi M. P. Singh/ Mahesh Pratap Singh S/O Rajendra Pratap Singh whose Aadhar card is attached to this appeal as page 8 of the attached annexures.
To
District Judge Lucknow
ADDRESS:- District & Sessions Court Lucknow
Kaisarbagh P.S.-Wazeerganj
Lucknow-226001 (Uttar Pradesh) India
Prayer-This appeal is filed by the appellant being aggrieved with the denial of information in the R.T.I. No. -49 /2021 of the appellant Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh submitted on 18 Nov 2021 ipso facto obvious from the attached document.
Speed post tracking and other detail of the appeal submitted before district judge Lucknow under Subsection 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005 is attached as PDF document to this grievance.
I pray before the Honourable Sir order dated 07-03-2006 passed by Justice B.B. Agarwal of Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad was bypassed by the Lucknow Development Authority and carried out execution of the registry and also bypassed by Home secretary, commissioner of police Lucknow and Station officer police station Ashiana Lucknow as respondent number 1, 2 and 3. by grabbing the land and house and slapping serious charges on the appellant and his family members and now the same blunder is being committed by your subordinate court bypassing order dated 07-03-2006 passed by Justice B.B. Agarwal of Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad.
I pray before the Honourable Sir order dated 07-03-2006 passed by Justice B.B. Agarwal of Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad It is simply ordered that the respondent number 4 to7 shall open the lock of the staircase so that Smt Anuradha Singh the petitioner may come out of the house and take the proper and appropriate remedy in the competent court and after that, she may have the liberty to go anywhere. Respondnt1-Secretary Dept. of home 2-Police commissioner Lucknow 3-SHO police station -Ashiana,
Moreover, Honourable Justice in its order said that the raised matter is civil and amenable by filing a title suit before the court or authority.
Grievance Document
Current Status
Grievance received
Date of Action
02/03/2022
Officer Concerns To
Forwarded to
Uttar Pradesh
Officer Name
Shri Arun Kumar Dube (Joint Secretary)
Organisation name
Uttar Pradesh
Contact Address
Chief Minister Secretariat U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address
sushil7769@gmail.com
Contact Number
05222215127
Tags:
Judiciary
I pray before the Honourable Sir order dated 07-03-2006 passed by Justice B.B. Agarwal of Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad It is simply ordered that the respondent number 4 to7 shall open the lock of the staircase so that Smt Anuradha Singh the petitioner may come out of the house and take the proper and appropriate remedy in the competent court and after that, she may have the liberty to go anywhere. Respondnt1-Secretary Dept. of home 2-Police commissioner Lucknow 3-SHO police station -Ashiana,
ReplyDeleteMoreover, Honourable Justice in its order said that the raised matter is civil and amenable by filing a title suit before the court or authority.
Think about the lawlessness and anarchy in the working of the district judge Lucknow which overlooked the order passed by the single bench of the Lucknow bench of the high court of judicature at the Allahabad and now district judge is running away from providing information under right to information act 2005.
ReplyDeleteI pray before the Honourable Sir order dated 07-03-2006 passed by Justice B.B. Agarwal of Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad was bypassed by the Lucknow Development Authority and carried out execution of the registry and also bypassed by Home secretary, commissioner of police Lucknow and Station officer police station Ashiana Lucknow
ReplyDelete