RTI Act 2005 has been put into dustbin because of rampant corruption in government

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 29/11/2019

Status REQUEST REJECTED as on 14/01/2020

Reason for Rejection :- Rule 4(5).

Remarks:-

  Nodal Officer Details  

Telephone Number 9454413939

Email-ID satyendra.13939@gov.in

Online RTI Request Form Details

Public Authority Details :- 

* Public Authority Administrative Reforms Department 

Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-

Registration Number DPTAR/R/2019/60037

Date of Filing 29/11/2019

* Name Yogi M P Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office

Pincode 231001

Country India

State Uttar Pradesh

Status Details not provided

Educational Status Literate

  Above Graduate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-7379105911

Email-ID yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Request Details :-

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line? No

((Description of Information sought (up to 500 characters)

* Description of Information Sought PIO may provide access to information in regard to recovery of the penalty imposed by SIC Uttar Pradesh 4 PIOs. 

1-Copy of Treasury Challan made in the four cases. 

2-Name of the PIO, still not paid the imposed penalty with detail of cause, not complying order of SIC. 

3-Reason of failure of D. M. Mirzapur in ensuring compliance of SIC orders attached to communiqué.

* Concerned PIO SATENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA SECTION 2

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))

Registration Number DPTAR/A/2020/60001

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 14/01/2020

Status APPEAL DISPOSED OF as on 20/03/2020

Reply :- Decision of PIO is correct. For point 3, information cannot be disclosed as per Rule 4(2)(b)(ii). Hence, first appeal disposed.

  Nodal Officer Details  

Telephone Number 9454413939

Email-ID satyendra.13939@gov.in

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :-

* Public Authority Administrative Reforms Department

Personal Details of Appellant:-

Request Registration Number DPTAR/R/2019/60037

Request Registration Date 29/11/2019

* Name Yogi M P Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office

Pincode 231001

Country India

State Uttar Pradesh

Status Details not provided

Educational Status Literate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-7379105911

Email-ID yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Appeal Details :-

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line? No

* Ground For Appeal Refused access to Information Requested

* PIO of Public Authority approached SATENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA SECTION 2

PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided

* PIO Order/Decision Date

((Description of Information sought (up to 500 characters)

* Prayer or Relief Sought Respected First Appellate Authority, the appellant kindly draws the due attention of the Honourable Sir to following submissions. 

1-SPIO violated the subsection 1 of section 7 of R.T.I. Act of 2005 so action must be taken. 

2-SPIO violated subsection 3 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act of 2005 so action must be taken. 

3-SPIO can only deny sought information under section 8 and 9 of R.T.I. Act of 2005 but did not do so so action must be taken. 

4-UPSIC had directed to ensure the compliance of recovery orders to D.M. Mirzapur so the matter is concerned with only D.M. and if D.M. is anarchist then department of administrative reform. Consequently, SPIO itself violated subclause 5 of clause 4 of notification as detail attached.

Supporting document ((only pdf up to 1 MB))

Yogi

An anti-corruption crusader. Motive to build a strong society based on the principle of universal brotherhood. Human rights defender and RTI activist.

1 Comments

Your view points inspire us

  1. 1-SPIO violated the subsection 1 of section 7 of R.T.I. Act of 2005 so action must be taken.

    2-SPIO violated subsection 3 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act of 2005 so action must be taken.

    3-SPIO can only deny sought information under section 8 and 9 of R.T.I. Act of 2005 but did not do so so action must be taken.

    4-UPSIC had directed to ensure the compliance of recovery orders to D.M. Mirzapur so the matter is concerned with only D.M. and if D.M. is anarchist then department of administrative reform. Consequently, SPIO itself violated subclause 5 of clause 4 of notification as detail attached.

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post