Your applicant tried 500 times to submit the R.T.I. communique online but website didn’t accept the entries

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Your applicant tried 500 times to submit the R.T.I. communique online but website didn’t accept the entries as usual in good governance.
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 17 November 2016 at 22:33
To: pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, secy-cic@nic.in


  1. With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
    1. 1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that 

     today again your applicant made repeated attempts but dilapidated website didn’t accept the application under Right to Information Act 2005 ..

  2. 2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that  during the regime of congress sought information were made  available so concerned ministries were exposed but those don’t believe in transparency and accountability how much credible can be easily guessed.  
  3.  This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook  the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                                                                     Yours  sincerely
                                                         Yogi M. P. Singh Mobile number-7379105911
    Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India

[Quoted text hidden]


Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Your applicant tried 500 times to submit the R.T.I. communique online but website didn’t accept the entries as usual in good governance.
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 7 November 2016 at 21:55
To: pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, secy-cic@nic.in



​Hon’ble Sir today your applicant again made efforts to submit R.T.I. Communique but remained failed reason best known to concerned web operator. It seems that RTI Online website is the inscrutable face of sphinx .

07 November 2016
20:01
With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
  1. 1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether your applicant has no right to use public facilities.  Whether public facilities can be used only by those who have grace of public functionaries  concerned. Whether this is reflection of good governance as few executives never tire in admiring good governance at the centre .
  2. 2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether truth can be concealed by making efforts like  creating hurdles in seeking information sought under right to information act 2005. Whether this is not insolence on the part of web operator that he is playing bad tricks in order to stop your applicant from seeking information
  3. 3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that from top to bottom no one talks of rule of law and no one advocates honesty and every one is busy to safeguard its settings. Few are amassing huge wealth and most are on the verge of hunger and hunger deaths are the lead stories of the dailies every day but still we are having good governance Whether this is not surprising.            

This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook  the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                                                                 Yours  sincerely
                                                     Yogi M. P. Singh Mobile number-7379105911
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India

On 6 November 2016 at 19:30, Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> wrote:

An  application under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005.
06 November 2016
17:52
Please provide access to information as sought by your applicant under following points within time as prescribed under subsection 1 of section 7  of Right to Information Act 2005.
When the CRPF web site charged four times fee from Alok Bhardwaj and two times fee from Mohammed Akaram ,then why concerned refunded only Rs. 300.00 and when Rs.148.00 included Rs.100 will be refunded by CRPF and Rs.48 by state bank of India . For detail please take a glance of attachment with this R.T.I. Communique .
1-Mr. CPIO Please tell me the time till then recruitment cell of C.R.P.F. will return back my payment made as
TO TRANSFER INB CRPF 1815155IG0BWTSOV0 TRANSFER TO  355029 in Mohammed Akaram case.
2-Directorate General, CRPF (Recruitment Branch) Block No.1, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-03
(Grih Mantralaya/ Bharat Sarkar) Help line No : 011- 24368630, Tele/Fax No : 011-24362730
No.A.VI.19/2015-Rectt (Min) Dated, the 12 August, 2016
To,
Shri Yogi M.P.Singh, Mirzapur(UP).
Please provide the name and designation of the staffs who processed my grievances  and reached on the conclusion to return back the excess amount charged in the case of Alok Bhardwaj  and consequently  aforementioned communication was made by department . 
3-Please made available circulars /government orders issued to deal such matters if arises with the department.
4-Please made available total excess amount charged from aspirants/students this year  and the mode in which this amount was spent. 
5-If such excess amount charged from students/aspirants ever returned by any Honest public functionary, then tell me the name and designation of that public staff who acted in public  spirit and honestly performed its duty. 
This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook  the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                                                                 Yours  sincerely
                                                     Yogi M. P. Singh Mobile number-7379105911
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India


2 attachments
R.T.I. Aplication.pdf
156K
Whether multiple times fee can be charged from an aspirant ..pdf
477K
RTI Online __ Submit Request Form.pdf
224K

2 comments on Your applicant tried 500 times to submit the R.T.I. communique online but website didn’t accept the entries

  1. Hon'ble Sir from top to bottom no one talks of rule of law and no one advocates honesty and every one is busy to safeguard its settings. Few are amassing huge wealth and most are on the verge of hunger and hunger deaths are the lead stories of the dailies every day but still we are having good governance. Whether this is not surprising.

  2. When the CRPF web site charged four times fee from Alok Bhardwaj and two times fee from Mohammed Akaram ,then why concerned refunded only Rs. 300.00 and when Rs.148.00 included Rs.100 will be refunded by CRPF and Rs.48 by state bank of India . For detail please take a glance of attachment with this R.T.I. Communique .Whether this is good governance of Modi Sir.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: