Your applicant is facing sheer injustice in judiciary and lost faith in its members.

Your applicant is facing sheer injustice in judiciary and lost faith in its members.

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh yogimpsingh@gmail.com

Attachments11:47 PM (0 minutes ago)

to supremecourthgovupcsupcmupuphrclko, bcc: pmosb, bcc: urgent-action
To
                 Chief Justice of India /Companion Judges
                       Supreme court of India ,New Delhi
Matter is concerned with the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate  {A.C.J.M. (First)} Court ,District court ,District-Mirzapur .
Criminal Complaint NO.  -2315/07 I.P.C. 500/501
Complainant- Santosh Dhar Dubey
                      S/O -Mr. Shiva Nath Dubey
                        Vill+P.O.-Nibee Gaharwar
                          Police station-Vindhyachal
                         Dist-Mirzapur ,Uttar Pradesh
Defendant  – Yogi M. P. Singh
                     S/O  -Shree Rajendra Pratap Singh
                       Moh-Surekapuram ,Jabalpur Road
                         Police station-Katra Kotwali
                       Dist-Mirzapur ,Uttar Pradesh
Prayer-Whether the act of A.C.J.M. Mirzapur is not lowering the dignity of court and credibility of judiciary in the mind of people is going down. 
With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether order passed by A.C.J.M. Court Mirzapur on 12/06/2008 was complied by D.M./DPRO Mirzapur if not why duo were not punished by court. Whether this not partiality. All the judges and bureaucrats accountable for non compliance of court order must be subjected to contempt of court proceedings but my repeated requests were gone in vain because of insensitivity of accountable public functionaries and pseudo love of them with independence of judiciary. Please take a glance of attached documents with this representation.
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that document dated 28/08/2006 submitted before the A.C.J.M. Court Mirzapur by the learned counsel for plaintiff  as supportive evidence against your applicant but missing since then and A.D.J. Is saying that in this matter action can be only taken by concerned judge but unfortunately concerned A.C.J.M. Don’t think it offence. Plaintiff in reply to query of your applicant said that where is particular document is not in my memory. Whether this is not cryptic dealing. When the matter was raised before D.J. Arvind Kumar Mishra , he said that ,don’t worry this is in your favour.
3–It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that several allegations were made against the gram pradhan Santosh Dhar Dubey by the villagers ,the team of district level officers Project Director Mirzapur and Deputy commissioner MGNREGA  Mirzapur found the allegations true when they carried out enquiry on the direction of D. M. Mirzapur and recommended to D.M. ,C.D.O. And DPRO Mirzapur to recover more than one lac from the gram pradhan as well as directed B.D.O. Chhanbey to lodge F.I.R. Against gram pradhan Santosh Dhar Dubey and Rojgar sevak Jwala Singh. Hon’ble Sir think about the credibility of Gram Pradhan Santosh Dhar Dubey who demanded from your applicant Rs.500000.00 as damages as his credit in society gone down in society because I made allegation against him which was proved wrong by enquiry carried out by assistant engineer. Assistant engineer was not district level officer and he was nominated E.O. In back date and carried out enquiry in the absence of your applicant and whereas  Executive Engineer K.N. Yadav was nominated E.O. By D.M. Mirzapur earlier as  was not provided documents  even after more that two dozen correspondence in more than eight months by gram pradhan and secretary. The cause of my absence was that assistant Engineer Vijay Shankar was nominated E.O. In the back date and not in order to my representations made to D.M. Mirzapur. At present my grievance is that A.C.J.M. First Mirzapur is not considering the join report of two district level officers which is against the gram pradhan Santosh Dhar Dubey. Whether this is not partiality and biased approach of a judicial member.
                                            
 This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook  the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                           ‘Yours  sincerely
                            Yogi M. P. Singh
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India .

2 comments on Your applicant is facing sheer injustice in judiciary and lost faith in its members.

  1. Hon'ble Sir that several allegations were made against the gram pradhan Santosh Dhar Dubey by the villagers ,the team of district level officers Project Director Mirzapur and Deputy commissioner MGNREGA Mirzapur found the allegations true when they carried out enquiry on the direction of D. M. Mirzapur and recommended to D.M. ,C.D.O. And DPRO Mirzapur to recover more than one lac from the gram pradhan as well as directed B.D.O. Chhanbey to lodge F.I.R. Against gram pradhan Santosh Dhar Dubey and Rojgar sevak Jwala Singh. Hon'ble Sir think about the credibility of Gram Pradhan Santosh Dhar Dubey who demanded from your applicant Rs.500000.00 as damages as his credit in society gone down in society because I made allegation against him which was proved wrong by enquiry carried out by assistant engineer. Assistant engineer was not district level officer and he was nominated E.O. In back date and carried out enquiry in the absence of your applicant and whereas Executive Engineer K.N. Yadav was nominated E.O. By D.M. Mirzapur earlier as was not provided documents even after more that two dozen correspondence in more than eight months by gram pradhan and secretary. The cause of my absence was that assistant Engineer Vijay Shankar was nominated E.O. In the back date and not in order to my representations made to D.M. Mirzapur. At present my grievance is that A.C.J.M. First Mirzapur is not considering the join report of two district level officers which is against the gram pradhan Santosh Dhar Dubey. Whether this is not partiality and biased approach of a judicial member.

  2. In the name of independence of judiciary, only corruption has increased in the system. What can be done if judicial member may overlook the grievances of aggrieved. Whether for simple matters, there is need to file an appeal before appropriate court. Every one knows that judicial members are not angels but they are products of our society so wrongdoings can be expected from them. Ipsofacto obvious that even genuine grievances of aggrieved is being overlooked by concerned judicial member.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: