Undoubtedly action must be taken against concerned staffs who are indulged in cheating students.

प्रिय श्रीमान / सुश्री महेश प्रताप सिंह ,
                  आपका पत्र मुख्यमंत्री कार्यालय में ई-मेल yogimpsingh@gmail.com द्वारा दिनांक 26/08/2016 को प्राप्त हुआ जिसे आवश्यक कार्यवाही हेतु प्रमुख सचिव/सचिव -संस्थागत वित्त एवं बैंकिंग को भेज दिया गया है। आपके पत्र की सन्दर्भ संख्या 15157160106542 है। विस्तृत जानकारी हेतु कृपया जनसुनवाई पोर्टल http://jansunwai.up.nic.in देखने का कष्ट करें।







अखिलेश यादव 
आवेदन का विवरण
शिकायत संख्या
15157160106542
आवेदक कर्ता का नाम:
महेश प्रताप सिंह
आवेदक कर्ता का मोबाइल न०:
0,0
विषय:
Because of
insecure payment of state bank of india transation remined failed and how
much shameful that want to charge commission on such failed transactions.
Whather this is good governance of central Goverment headed by modi sir
नियत तिथि:
08 – Oct – 2016
शिकायत की स्थिति:
लम्बित
अग्रसारित विवरण
क्र..
सन्दर्भ का प्रकार
आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी
आदेश दिनांक
अधिकारी को प्रेषित
आदेश
आख्या दिनांक
आख्या
स्थिति
आख्या रिपोर्ट
1
आख्या
जी.एस. नवीन कुमार(विशेष सचिव मुख्यमंत्री कार्यालय )
05
– Sep – 2016
प्रमुख सचिव/सचिव संस्थागत वित्त एवं
बैंकिंग
कृपया प्रकरण में
नियमानुसार कार्यवाही किए जाने तथा कृत
कार्यवाही की सूचना आवेदक के मेल पर भेजते हुए उसकी प्रति Cmup@nic.in पर भी भेजने की अपेक्षा की गयी
है। 
आख्या
लंबित

Because of insecure payment of State Bank of India transactions remained failed and how much shameful that they want to charge Commission on such failed transactions. Whether this is good governance of central Government headed by Modi Sir.


Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh yogimpsingh@gmail.com

27 Aug

to presidentofind.pmosbsupremecourturgent-actioncmupcsuphgovup
Undoubtedly State bank of India is misleading the concerned or all are acting in caucus with each other. What is the credibility of bank which charges Rs.57 as Commission on the collection of Rs.50 .00 as fee from the Students. It most unfortunate that bank which remained failed to secure the transactions which was its obligatory duty and now how much shameful that charged Commission on failed transactions are not being returned by them.
Print || Logout
Status as on 26 Aug 2016
Registration Number : DEABD/E/2016/09448 Name Of Complainant : Yogi M P Singh Date of Receipt : 11 Aug 2016 Received by : Department of Financial Services (Banking Division) Forwarded to : SBI LHO LUCKNOW Contact Address : State Bank of India,New Administrative Bldg. , Motimahal Marg , Hazratganj , Lucknow (UP)226001 Contact Number : 05222201492 Grievance Description : When the CRPF web site charged four times fee from Alok Bhardwaj and two times fee from Mohammed Akaram ,then why concerned refunded only Rs. 300.00 and when Rs.148.00 will be refunded by them.With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows. 1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Rs.48.00 commission was charged by state bank of India on failed transactions which is sheer illegal and unjustified can’t be pardoned under the law of land. 2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that if the accountable staffs of state bank of India has fragment of honesty ,then they must return the commission charged by them on failed transactions. But it seems that we are living in a land where ideals virtues have no place. 3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that please take a glance of following reply of branch manager Varanasi which shows that concerned even didn’t considered it appropriate to take the perusal of submitted grievance.Hon’ble staff of state bank of India whether you don’t understand the meaning of following transactions – 01Aug16 (01Aug2016) CREDIT REF NO IG0BWVOND0 AMT REVERSED 100.00 2,477.47 01Aug16 (01Aug2016) CREDIT REF NO IG0BWOUVQ4 AMT REVERSED 100.00 2,577.47 01Aug16 (01Aug2016) CREDIT REF NO IG0BWOXPD4 AMT REVERSED 100.00 2,677.47 If aforesaid amount can be refunded back into account of your applicant ,then why not commission? Commission is paid on payment not for failed transactions.There are four failed transactions ,one still awaits to be refunded back by CRPF. But you have not refunded the charged commission on these failed transactions. Next thing don’t explain credit and debit as your applicant better understands these definitions. That Rs.56 commission on Rs.50 is the part of rampant corruption prevailed in all branches of state bank of India which was not replied by reserve bank of India consequently second appeal under subsection 3 of section 19 of Right to Information act 2005 has been filed against CPIO reserve bank of India before CIC. Current Status : CASE CLOSED Date of Action : 26 Aug 2016 Details : COMPLAINANT WAS ADVISED SUITABLY BY THE RBO THROUGH AN E-MAIL, COPY ATTACHED

2 comments on Undoubtedly action must be taken against concerned staffs who are indulged in cheating students.

  1. Registration Number : DEABD/E/2016/09448 Name Of Complainant : Yogi M P Singh Date of Receipt : 11 Aug 2016 Received by : Department of Financial Services (Banking Division) Forwarded to : SBI LHO LUCKNOW Contact Address : State Bank of India,New Administrative Bldg. , Motimahal Marg , Hazratganj , Lucknow (UP)226001 Contact Number : 05222201492 Grievance Description : When the CRPF web site charged four times fee from Alok Bhardwaj and two times fee from Mohammed Akaram ,then why concerned refunded only Rs. 300.00 and when Rs.148.00 will be refunded by them

  2. Undoubtedly condition is deplorable because they don't want to return back excess deducted amount from the account. What kind of justice is being provided to citizenry that additionally charged fee being not returned back by the government headed by Modi Sir.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: