Why subordinate offices in the government of Uttar Pradesh adopt lackadaisical approach?

Gmail Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Why subordinate offices in the government of Uttar Pradesh adopt lackadaisical approach on the grievances forwarded by chief minister office.
yogimpsingh@gmail.com <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 2:54 PM
To: pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, “cmup@up.nic.in” <cmup@up.nic.in>, csup <csup@up.nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, “hgovup@up.nic.in” <hgovup@up.nic.in>, “cmd@uppcl.org” <cmd@uppcl.org>, “md@uppcl.org” <md@uppcl.org>

Whether it is justified that public functionaries in the Government of Uttar Pradesh may procrastinate on the letters of chief minister office and concerned accountable public functionaries may adopt lackadaisical approach in taking action against these wrongdoers. Whether this is signal of good governance in the state.
03 October 2015
14:00
Hon’ble Sir -To redress the grievance of citizenry is excellent characteristic of democratically elected government but in the state of Uttar Pradesh no subordinate functionary cares about the forwarded letters of chief minister office. It is most unfortunate that there is no effective control of key office on the subordinate offices which is not only signal indiscipline but also showing the incompetency of the bureaucrats posted in the key office. What action is being taken on the grievances forwarded by the chief minister office is not fed up on the website as required from the field officers. This is an anarchy but it can be experienced by aggrieved not by beneficiary of anarchy .Even R.T.I. Communiques are failed to provide information in regard to action taken on the forwarded grievances of chief minister office.
 With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
Direct concerned to make available sought information as sought by your applicant.
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
    Sep 30 (3 days ago)
    to pmosb, supremecourt, urgent-action, hgovup, cmup, csup, uphrclko, lokayukta, cmd, md, directordist, MD
An application under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005.
To
                     Mr. Deepak Shrivastava III
                    Under secretary (Public Information Officer section-15) ,Room No. 329 ,Shakti Bhawan (Head quarter), 14-Ashok Marg , Lucknow ,Uttar Pradesh ,Mobile No.9454468991.
Subject-To furnish access to information as sought by your applicant under aforesaid subsection and section within time as prescribed under subsection 1 of section 7 of Right to information act 2005.
 With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether any action was taken by managing director, Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited on the following submitted grievance forwarded by chief minister office to him.
कम्प्यूटर सँख्या : PG05669400 , प्रेषित तिथि 08/08/2015, पत्रांक : -PG05669400/लो.शि.-2/2015
विषय : प्रार्थना पत्र अण्‍डरं सेक्‍सन 142 का विद्युतिकरण नियम 2003
प्रेषक : श्रीएमपीसिहं , 2 तल किसान मण्‍डी भवन ,गोमती नगर , लखनऊ , उत्तर प्रदेश
प्रेषित : प्रबन्ध निदेशक.प्र.पावर कारपोरेशन लि., उत्तर प्रदेश
संदर्भ प्रकार : अन्तरित
सन्दर्भ स्थिति  अन्तरितअन्तरण दिनांक : 08/08/2015
1a-Please provide the notings in regard to aforesaid correspondences.
1b-Please provide Minutes of proceedings to your applicant.
1c-If any correspondence was made with the concerned ,then made available the copy of the letter.
1d-Please made available the duration in which action is taken by managing director ,UPPCL on the grievances forwarded by chief minister office.
 2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether any action was taken by managing director, Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited on the following submitted grievance forwarded by chief minister office to him.
कम्प्यूटर सँख्या : PG05671494 , प्रेषित तिथि 12/08/2015, पत्रांक : -PG05671494/लो.शि.-2/2015
विषय : प्रार्थी के पत्र का अवलोकन कर उचित कार्यवाही करने के सम्‍बंध में 
प्रेषक : श्रीएम0पीसिहं        , मोसुरेकापुरम जबलपुर रोड , मिर्जापुर , उत्तर प्रदेश
प्रेषित : प्रबन्ध निदेशक.प्र.पावर कारपोरेशन लि., उत्तर प्रदेश
संदर्भ प्रकार : अन्तरित
सन्दर्भ स्थिति  अन्तरितअन्तरण दिनांक : 12/08/2015
2a-Please provide the notings in regard to aforesaid correspondences.
2b-Please provide Minutes of proceedings to your applicant.
2c-If any correspondence was made with the concerned ,then made available the copy of the letter.
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether any action was taken by managing director, Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited on the following submitted grievance forwarded by chief minister office to him.
कम्प्यूटर सँख्या : PG05688647 , प्रेषित तिथि 16/09/2015, पत्रांक : -PG05688647/लो.शि.-2/2015
विषय प्रार्थी के पत्र का अवलोकन कर उचित कार्यवाही करने के सम्‍बंध में 
प्रेषक श्रीमहेश प्रताप सिहं , 2 तल किसान मण्‍डी भवन गोमती नगर लखनऊ उत्तरप्रदेश
प्रेषित प्रबन्ध निदेशक.प्र.पावर कारपोरेशन लि., उत्तर प्रदेश
संदर्भ प्रकार अन्तरित
सन्दर्भ स्थिति – अन्तरितअन्तरण दिनांक : 16/09/2015
3a-Please provide the notings in regard to aforesaid correspondences.
3b-Please provide Minutes of proceedings to your applicant.
3c-If any correspondence was made with the concerned ,then made available the copy of the letter.
               This is humble request of your applicant to provide the sought information to your applicant at the earliest if not feasible within time as prescribed under subsection 1 of section 7 of Right to Information Act 2005. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                                                                        Yours sincerely
Date-30/09/2015                                             Yogi M. P. Singh
Mohalla-Surekapuram ,Jabalpur Road ,District-Mirzapur ,State-Uttar Pradesh ,India
Mobile number-7379105911 .
Note-Two postal orders bearing serial number-34F   629680 &   34F   629679 of amount Rs.10.00 each are attached with this R.T.I. Communique as R.T.I. Fee which are payable to account officer ,UPPCL ,Lucknow.
Original R.T.I. Communique in two pages with three pages annexures of supporting e-mail sent to various public offices .
All the pages are well signed by your applicant. 
Attachments area
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
कम्प्यूटर सँख्या : PG05690975 , प्रेषित तिथि 22/09/2015, पत्रांक : -PG05690975/लो.शि.-2/2015
विषय प्रार्थना पत्र का पूर्ण अवलोकन कर कार्यवाही किये जाने के संबंध में।
प्रेषक श्रीएमपीसिंह मोहजबलपुर रोड पुलिस स्टेशन कटरा कोतवाली मिर्जापुर उत्तर प्रदेश
प्रेषित प्रमुख सचिव/सचिवन्याय एवं विधि परामर्शीउत्तर प्रदेश शासन
संदर्भ प्रकार अन्तरित
सन्दर्भ स्थिति – अन्तरितअन्तरण दिनांक : 22/09/2015
निस्तारण विवरणअन्तरित  आपका प्रार्थनापत्र निस्तारण हेतु प्रमुख सचिव/सचिवन्याय एवं विधि परामर्शीउत्तर प्रदेश शासन को प्रेषित कर दिया गया है  कृपया सम्बंधितअधिकारी से अपने कम्प्यूटर सन्दर्भ संख्या के साथ संपर्क करने का कष्ट करें 
सम्बन्धित अधिकारी/विभाग द्वारा भरी गयी सूचना
अध्यावधिक स्थिति : –
सम्बन्धित अनुभाग : –
सम्बन्धित जनपद : –
जवाब भेजे जाने की तिथि : –
अभियुक्ति : –
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
कम्प्यूटर सँख्या : PG05691272 , प्रेषित तिथि 22/09/2015, पत्रांक : -PG05691272/लो.शि.-2/2015
विषय 0प्रसरकार द्वारा शोषण के विरूद्व कार्यवाही  करने के सम्‍बंध में 
प्रेषक श्रीएम0पीसिहं मोसुरेकापुरम जबलपूर रोड मिर्जापुर उत्तर प्रदेश
प्रेषित प्रमुख सचिव/सचिवपंचायती राजउत्तर प्रदेश शासन
संदर्भ प्रकार अन्तरित
सन्दर्भ स्थिति – अन्तरितअन्तरण दिनांक : 22/09/2015
निस्तारण विवरणअन्तरित  आपका प्रार्थनापत्र निस्तारण हेतु प्रमुख सचिव/सचिवपंचायती राजउत्तर प्रदेश शासन को प्रेषित कर दिया गया है  कृपया सम्बंधित अधिकारी से अपनेकम्प्यूटर सन्दर्भ संख्या के साथ संपर्क करने का कष्ट करें 
सम्बन्धित अधिकारी/विभाग द्वारा भरी गयी सूचना
अध्यावधिक स्थिति : –
सम्बन्धित अनुभाग : –
सम्बन्धित जनपद : –
जवाब भेजे जाने की तिथि : –
अभियुक्ति : –
4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
कम्प्यूटर सँख्या : PG05688914 , प्रेषित तिथि 18/09/2015, पत्रांक : -PG05688914/लो.शि.-2/2015
विषय ग्राम नीबी गहरवार ब्लाक छानबे के तैनात बी0एलश्री सुरेश दुबे के विरूद्व शिकायत के संबंध में।
प्रेषक श्रीयोगी एम0पीसिंह नि0-सुरेखपुरम मिर्जापुर उत्तर प्रदेश
प्रेषित जिलाधिकारीमिर्जापुरउत्तर प्रदेश
संदर्भ प्रकार आख्‍या
सन्दर्भ स्थिति – लम्बितअनिस्तारित
सम्बन्धित अधिकारी/विभाग द्वारा भरी गयी सूचना
अध्यावधिक स्थिति : –
सम्बन्धित अनुभाग : –
सम्बन्धित जनपद : –
जवाब भेजे जाने की तिथि : –
अभियुक्ति : –
5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
कम्प्यूटर सँख्या : PG05688647 , प्रेषित तिथि 16/09/2015, पत्रांक : -PG05688647/लो.शि.-2/2015
विषय प्रार्थी के पत्र का अवलोकन कर उचित कार्यवाही करने के सम्‍बंध में 
प्रेषक श्रीमहेश प्रताप सिहं , 2 तल किसान मण्‍डी भवन गोमती नगर लखनऊ उत्तर प्रदेश
प्रेषित प्रबन्ध निदेशक.प्र.पावर कारपोरेशन लि., उत्तर प्रदेश
संदर्भ प्रकार अन्तरित
सन्दर्भ स्थिति – अन्तरितअन्तरण दिनांक : 16/09/2015
निस्तारण विवरणअन्तरित  आपका प्रार्थनापत्र निस्तारण हेतु प्रबन्ध निदेशक.प्र.पावर कारपोरेशन लि., उत्तर प्रदेश को प्रेषित कर दिया गया है  कृपया सम्बंधित अधिकारी सेअपने कम्प्यूटर सन्दर्भ संख्या के साथ संपर्क करने का कष्ट करें 
सम्बन्धित अधिकारी/विभाग द्वारा भरी गयी सूचना
अध्यावधिक स्थिति : –
सम्बन्धित अनुभाग : –
सम्बन्धित जनपद : –
जवाब भेजे जाने की तिथि : –
अभियुक्ति : –
6-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
कम्प्यूटर सँख्या : PG05686602 , प्रेषित तिथि 12/09/2015, पत्रांक : -PG05686602/लो.शि.-2/2015
विषय मिर्जापुर जिले में नागरिकों के अधिकार की सुरक्षा के संबंध में।
प्रेषक श्रीयोगी एम0पीसिंह        , सुरेखापुरजबलपुर रोड मिर्जापुर उत्तर प्रदेश
प्रेषित प्रमुख सचिव/सचिवपर्यावरणउत्तर प्रदेश शासन
संदर्भ प्रकार अन्तरित
सन्दर्भ स्थिति – अन्तरितअन्तरण दिनांक : 12/09/2015
निस्तारण विवरणअन्तरित  आपका प्रार्थनापत्र निस्तारण हेतु प्रमुख सचिव/सचिवपर्यावरणउत्तर प्रदेश शासन को प्रेषित कर दिया गया है  कृपया सम्बंधित अधिकारी से अपनेकम्प्यूटर सन्दर्भ संख्या के साथ संपर्क करने का कष्ट करें 
सम्बन्धित अधिकारी/विभाग द्वारा भरी गयी सूचना
अध्यावधिक स्थिति : –
सम्बन्धित अनुभाग : –
सम्बन्धित जनपद : –
जवाब भेजे जाने की तिथि : –
अभियुक्ति : –
7-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
कम्प्यूटर सँख्या : PG05685566 , प्रेषित तिथि 10/09/2015, पत्रांक : -PG05685566/लो.शि.-2/2015
विषय प्रार्थी के पत्र का अवलोकन कर उचित कार्यवाही करने के सम्‍बंध में 
प्रेषक श्रीएमपीसिहं मोसुरेखुपरम ,जबलपुर रोड मिर्जापुर उत्तर प्रदेश
प्रेषित प्रमुख सचिव/सचिवपंचायती राजउत्तर प्रदेश शासन
संदर्भ प्रकार अन्तरित
सन्दर्भ स्थिति – अन्तरितअन्तरण दिनांक : 10/09/2015
निस्तारण विवरणअन्तरित  आपका प्रार्थनापत्र निस्तारण हेतु प्रमुख सचिव/सचिवपंचायती राजउत्तर प्रदेश शासन को प्रेषित कर दिया गया है  कृपया सम्बंधित अधिकारी से अपनेकम्प्यूटर सन्दर्भ संख्या के साथ संपर्क करने का कष्ट करें 
सम्बन्धित अधिकारी/विभाग द्वारा भरी गयी सूचना
अध्यावधिक स्थिति : –
सम्बन्धित अनुभाग : –
सम्बन्धित जनपद : –
जवाब भेजे जाने की तिथि : –
अभियुक्ति : –
8-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
कम्प्यूटर सँख्या : PG05672659 , प्रेषित तिथि 14/08/2015, पत्रांक : -PG05672659/लो.शि.-2/2015
विषय प्रार्थना पत्र का अवलोकन कर कार्यवाही किये जाने के संबंध में।
प्रेषक श्रीयोगी प्रताप सिंह नीबि गहरवार ग्राम पंलोहिया ग्राम पो– नीबि ब्लाक छानवे पुलिस स्टेशन विन्ध्याचल मिर्जापुर उत्तर प्रदेश
प्रेषित निदेशकपंचायती राजउत्तर प्रदेश
संदर्भ प्रकार अन्तरित
सन्दर्भ स्थिति – अन्तरितअन्तरण दिनांक : 14/08/2015
निस्तारण विवरणअन्तरित  आपका प्रार्थनापत्र निस्तारण हेतु निदेशकपंचायती राजउत्तर प्रदेश को प्रेषित कर दिया गया है  कृपया सम्बंधित अधिकारी से अपने कम्प्यूटर सन्दर्भसंख्या के साथ संपर्क करने का कष्ट करें 
सम्बन्धित अधिकारी/विभाग द्वारा भरी गयी सूचना
अध्यावधिक स्थिति : –
सम्बन्धित अनुभाग : –
सम्बन्धित जनपद : –
जवाब भेजे जाने की तिथि : –
अभियुक्ति : –
9-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
कम्प्यूटर सँख्या : PG05673702 , प्रेषित तिथि 17/08/2015, पत्रांक : -PG05673702/लो.शि.-2/2015
विषय प्रार्थना पत्र का अवलोकन कर उचित कार्यवाही कराने के संबंध में।
प्रेषक श्रीएम0पी0सिंह मोहल्ला सुरेखापुरजबलपुर रोड मिर्जापुर उत्तर प्रदेश
प्रेषित जिलाधिकारीमिर्जापुरउत्तर प्रदेश
संदर्भ प्रकार अन्तरित
सन्दर्भ स्थिति – अन्तरितअन्तरण दिनांक : 17/08/2015
निस्तारण विवरणअन्तरित  आपका प्रार्थनापत्र निस्तारण हेतु जिलाधिकारीमिर्जापुरउत्तर प्रदेश को प्रेषित कर दिया गया है  कृपया सम्बंधित अधिकारी से अपने कम्प्यूटर सन्दर्भसंख्या के साथ संपर्क करने का कष्ट करें 
सम्बन्धित अधिकारी/विभाग द्वारा भरी गयी सूचना
अध्यावधिक स्थिति निस्‍तारित प्रकरण में शिकायतकर्ता न्‍यायालय में वाद योजित कर अनुतोष प्राप्‍त कर सकता हैा (वैब साईट के माध्यम से अंकित)
सम्बन्धित अनुभाग जिलापूर्ति अधिकारी
सम्बन्धित जनपद मिर्जापुर
जवाब भेजे जाने की तिथि :
अभियुक्ति निस्‍तारित
Whether these companies are less dangerous than East India company and ongoing emperor is less weaker than last Mughal emperor.
    Aug 9
    to pmosb, supremecourt, urgent-action, hgovup, csup, cmup
Your applicant bought the printer in Rs.9800 .00 was provided warranty of one year now over EPSON company may decide its price and your applicant is ready to return back on the decided price of company staff .
Information displaying on the screen flashes  as  printers ink pad is at the end of its service life ,please contact EPSON support. A printer of approximately Rs.10000 .00 could’t print the 10000 copies whether it is justified when market value of copy is Rs.1.00 per copy including the paper price.  Five times it got defaulted in warranty period . Whether a product is sold on the basis warranty but actually one year warranty means product’s stability is more than one year. Please direct the company it may decide the present price of the product and get back my printer if it can’t provide the facility repairing to your applicant as no local facility is available. In 12 month ,only 8 months printer was O.K. As rest of time spent in requesting service centre when you are sending the engineer to repair the printer. Hon’ble Sir think about the miserable conditions of consumers in this country whether their rights are safe.  
Hon’ble Sir black ink is out flowing from the printer and concerned staff of company overlooking my grievance in the name of warranty is expired. Hon’ble Sir whether the two months can’t be included in the warranty during which printer didn’t act because of staff of company as your applicant had already submitted the application which was as follows and listed in your complaints . Please direct the staff of company either redress my grievance or take back their printer. What is the stability of product which delivers function on the basis of warranty. How much surprising that after 8000 printing system automatically stops to function and consumer has to contact the staff company who do bargaining after that.
Matter is concerned with Mahesh Pratap Singh (Yogi M. P. Singh ) Mohalla-Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road , Mirzapur city District-Mirzapur  (U.P.)
Your applicant purchased a printer from shop digital world Dundhi Katra Mirzapur which cost Rs.9800.00 was paid to shopkeeper ipsofacto obvious from the annexure. According to cash memo -warranty is given by manufacturer not by the firm. It means warranty is subjected to Manufacturer i.e. Epson company.
Once printer colour head was short circuited , then company staff took two months to repair. They usually used to tell  me that they have sent the order to Bangalore and in one order we seek numerous repairing parts so this usually comes in one month. Consequently they had taken two months to repair my printer.
Now again it is not taking ink but after noting the complaint company staff is not attending the phone which is being made by your applicant from phone number 7379105911 on Mobile numbers- 18004250011 , 9628372010 and 9628372009 . Whether it is justified.
Their lackadaisical approach in regard to redressing my grievances is on its zenith. Hon’ble Sir if they don’t want to provide the services ,then they take back their product and return back my paid amount. The dull approach of company staff in regard to providing services causing mental trauma to your applicant. Concerned company may be directed to provide compensation to your applicant Rs.5000.00 as damages in the form of mental and physical traumas .
EPSON INDIA PVT LTD  , 12th Floor , The Millenia ,Tower A , No. 1 , Murphy Road ,
Ulsoor , M. G. Bangalore -560008 ,Fax:080-30515005/30515078 ,Tel:080-30515000
This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook  the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                           ‘Yours  sincerely
                            Yogi M. P. Singh
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India .
10-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
Please direct EPSON Company not to infringe consumer rights of your applicant.
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
    Sep 25 (8 days ago)
    to up-sforum, pmosb, cmup, csup, hgovup, supremecourt, urgent-action
Whether it is justified that EPSON company sold the printer to your applicant but software to delete the memory of the printer still in the possession of company and company staff fixes the memory so it is filled after 2000 scan/prints and then printer’s function is automatically stopped . Now purchaser requests the service centre staff times and again if printer is under warranty ,then they delete the memory and printer functions as usual but if the printer is not under warranty ,then they charge Rs.700 to delete the memory.
25 September 2015
16:34
Direct the EPSON company to provide your applicant software which deletes the memory of printer or if can’t provide then such services be provided free of cost by the company through its service centres.
Hon’ble sir company once has sold the articles to its consumers ,then to operate ,use and maintenace is subjected to ambit of consumer not company but company by not providing software to delete the memory of computer to the consumers is encroaching their consumer rights as well as exploiting them through their greedy service centre staffs. Hon’ble Sir whether such company may be allowed to do business in the country which are acting like looters.
Whether these companies are less dangerous than East India company and ongoing emperor is less weaker than last Mughal emperor.
If concerned public functionaries of Government of India can’t protect the consumer rights of your applicant ,then be instrumental in returning back my printer to company concerned.
Your applicant bought the printer in Rs.9800 .00 was provided warranty of one year now over EPSON company may decide its price and your applicant is ready to return back on the decided price of company staff .
 Five times it got defaulted in warranty period . Whether a product is sold on the basis warranty but actually one year warranty means product’s stability is more than one year. Please direct the company it may decide the present price of the product and get back my printer if it can’t provide the facility repairing to your applicant as no local facility is available. In 12 month ,only 8 months printer was O.K. As rest of time spent in requesting service centre when you are sending the engineer to repair the printer. Hon’ble Sir think about the miserable conditions of consumers in this country whether their rights are safe.  
 What is the stability of product which delivers function on the basis of warranty. How much surprising that after 8000 printing system automatically stops to function and consumer has to contact the staff company who do bargaining after that.
Matter is concerned with Mahesh Pratap Singh (Yogi M. P. Singh ) Mohalla-Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road , Mirzapur city District-Mirzapur (U.P.)
Your applicant purchased a printer from shop digital world Dundhi Katra Mirzapur which cost Rs.9800.00 was paid to shopkeeper ipsofacto obvious from the annexure. According to cash memo -warranty is given by manufacturer not by the firm. It means warranty is subjected to Manufacturer i.e. Epson company.
EPSON INDIA PVT LTD  , 12th Floor , The Millenia ,Tower A , No. 1 , Murphy Road ,
Ulsoor , M. G. Bangalore -560008 ,Fax:080-30515005/30515078 ,Tel:080-30515000
This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook  the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                           ‘Yours  sincerely
                            Yogi M. P. Singh
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India .
Sent from Windows Mail


10 attachments — Download all attachments View all images
Image1401.gif
1K View Download
Image1403.gif
1K View Download
Image1397.jpg
1K View Download
Image1406.gif
1K View Download
Image1400.gif
1K View Download
Image1399.gif
1K View Download
Image1405.gif
1K View Download
Image1398.gif
1K View Download
Image1404.gif
1K View Download
Image1402.jpg
1K View Download

2 comments on Why subordinate offices in the government of Uttar Pradesh adopt lackadaisical approach?

  1. Hon'ble Sir -To redress the grievance of citizenry is excellent characteristic of democratically elected government but in the state of Uttar Pradesh no subordinate functionary cares about the forwarded letters of chief minister office. It is most unfortunate that there is no effective control of key office on the subordinate offices which is not only signal indiscipline but also showing the incompetency of the bureaucrats posted in the key office. What action is being taken on the grievances forwarded by the chief minister office is not fed up on the website as required from the field officers. This is an anarchy but it can be experienced by aggrieved not by beneficiary of anarchy .Even R.T.I. Communiques are failed to provide information in regard to action taken on the forwarded grievances of chief minister office.
    With due respect your

  2. Really to procrastinate on the grievances forwarded by chief minister office by the concerned officers of the subordinate staff/offices is signal of precarious situation. Undoubtedly such condition raises finger on ability of officers posted in the chief minister secretariat. Now this question arises that if the person elected has no capability to provide good governance, then electorates may be provided opportunity to recall such representatives.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: