Why R.T.I. online portal of Govt. of India is in dilapidated state because govt. is avoiding transparency and accountability

Preeti Singh <preetisinghgaharwar@gmail.com>
R.T.I. Online portal of government of India is in dilapidated state as not working properly.
1 message
Preeti Singh <preetisinghgaharwar@gmail.com> 28 July 2020 at 16:42
To: pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, Anjali Anand Srivastava <secy-cic@nic.in>, helprtionline-dopt@nic.in

Applicant completed the entire formalities and finally paid the fee.

But the process at the final state could not complete as it seems that there are some cunning activities behind such things.

Who are stumbling blocks in seeking information from the government offices?

Bank transaction details are as follows.

28 Jul 2020 TO TRANSFER-INB RTI Online PaymentDOCAFR2020000 0000651IK0APXU RW4 TRANS 10.00

Sought information is as follows.

Please provide the following information to the applicant.

1-Detail of the manufacturing company was not available on the Amazon online shopping platform.

2-Complaint is against the seller but the staff of Amazon online shopping redresses grievance.

If Amazon is the only facilitator then they must avail the reply of the seller.

Provide the provision which allows the selling of the product of an unregistered company.

3-Provide the reason for not taking action against the unregistered company manufacturing whiteboard marker ink and selling openly in the market.

खुदा भी आसमाँ से जब जमी पे देखता होगा |

इस मेरे प्यारे देश को क्या हुआ सोचता होगा||

This is a humble request of your applicant to you, Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos arbitrarily by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.

Date-28/07/2020           Yours sincerely

Preeti Singh, Mobile number-9336252631, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.

Grievance Status for registration number : DOCAF/E/2020/02763

Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Preeti Singh
Date of Receipt
Received By Ministry/Department
Consumer Affairs
Grievance Details-
Here grievance Number 1812895 Grievance Reg Date 26 Dec 2019 Complainant Name Preeti Singh.
The aforementioned grievance is submitted on the portal of the ministry of consumer affairs, and they disposed of the matter arbitrarily by making the mockery of the consumer rights of the applicant, so concerned may direct them to pursue the provisions and spirit of the consumer protection Act.
Whether such things are legitimate which is going on in this country?  Sir, It is sheer unjustified to overlook the grievances of the applicant on the flimsy ground ipso facto obvious.
Here it is quite obvious that the seller who sold the product is not a manufacturing company.
He made a spurious whiteboard marker ink and making stupid innocent and gullible citizenry including the applicant.
Undoubtedly Amazon did not make the ink but sold the ink so Amazon colluded with the seller in pursuing unlawful business. Such cheaters pursuing business on the Amazon online shopping must be subjected to penal proceedings per the law.
Grievance Document
Current Status
Case closed
Date of Action
Response received from company as- Please note that the orders are subject to the Amazon return policy as found on http://amzn.to/2AO2ckF.
The policy allows for return for specified merchandise for a full refund in case the same are returned within the time as stipulated there under.
Accordingly, we are unable to process your request for return and refund since the same has been placed after the expiry of the return window, which expired on 10th August 2019. Further, it is submitted that our role is limited to that of an intermediary, and we are not the seller/manufacturer of the products listed on our Website. The products listed on our Website are sold by independent third party sellers.
In view of the above, the issue stands closed. NCH tried to contact consumer on 23-07-2020 at 12:14 PM to take feedback but could not connect on call as the call was not picked by consumer.
Hence, further advised that if you are not satisfied with company response , you may file a case in a District Consumer Forum against the company, following the procedure prescribed by them. For details, you may refer http://www.ncdrc.nic.in/districtlist.html. Grievance closed from NCH.
Rating Remarks
Here matter is concerned with the spurious white board marker ink. When I will not confirm with it, how can I make complaint about it as before making a complaint against anybody one must have substantial evidence against anybody.
Immediately it was not feasible to make the complaint without using the product and a solid confirmation regarding the fake nature of the product.
Here most important question is that whether a seller can be allowed to sell the fake product from the Amazon online shopping and can cheat innocent and gullible citizenry by selling the fake item as genuine one.
Initially it might be considered that the seller was acting in caucus with the corrupt staffs of the Amazon online shopping and both were cheating innocent and gullible consumers but non action by the government on the repeated representations of the applicant is only showing that government functionaries collude in such illegal practice which is illegal and unconstitutional. Too much embarrassing acts
Officer Concerns To
Officer Name
Prof. Suresh Mishra
Officer Designation
Contact Address
Suresh Mishra IIPA New Delhi
Email Address
Contact Number
5 1 vote
Article Rating
Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Arun Pratap Singh
4 months ago

अरे भैया मोदी आप इमानदार है तो आप के अधीनस्थ सूचना देने से भाग क्यों रहे है | सोचिये वेबसाइट अपने ढंग से डील कर रहे है | THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005 श्री मन जी कांग्रेस की सरकार थी उस समय इमानदारी इतनी आसान नही है अब पोल खुल रहा है |
No. 22 of 2005
[15th June, 2005.]
An Act to provide for setting out the practical regime of right to information for
citizens to secure access to information under the control of public
authorities, in order to promote transparency and accountability in the
working of every public authority.

4 months ago

Here everyone is doing hypocrisy of the honest and misleading public through media. Except few media channels, most are busy whole day and night to mislead the countrymen. I think that during the British colonial rule there was no such anarchy as during the ongoing incumbent. Our motive is good governance but the motive of the ongoing incumbent is to provide the dream of good governance and not allow the citizenry to awake by using various misleading tricks.

Pratima Parihar
Pratima Parihar
4 months ago

यहाँ बात सफेद बोर्ड मार्कर स्याही से संबंधित है और जब मैं इसके साथ निश्चित निष्कर्ष पर नहीं पहुचूगी तो मैं किसी भी कंपनी के खिलाफ पर्याप्त सबूत होने से पहले कैसे इसके बारे में शिकायत कर सकती हूं। तुरंत उत्पाद का उपयोग किए बिना शिकायत करना संभव नहीं था और उत्पाद की नकली प्रकृति के बारे में ठोस पुष्टि नहीं हुई थी उस समय तक यहां सबसे महत्वपूर्ण सवाल यह है कि क्या किसी विक्रेता को ऑनलाइन शॉपिंग में नकली उत्पाद बेचने की अनुमति दी जा सकती है और नकली वस्तु को वास्तविक बना कर बेचना और क्या निर्दोष और भोला नागरिक को धोखा दिया जा सकता है।

Vandana Singh
Vandana Singh
4 months ago

उस समय तक यहां सबसे महत्वपूर्ण सवाल यह है कि किसी भी विक्रेता को ऑनलाइन खरीदारी में नकली उत्पाद बेचने की अनुमति दी जा सकती है। और नकली वस्तु को समकालीन बना कर बेचना और क्या निर्दोष और भोला नागरिक को धोखा दिया जा सकता हैयहाँ बात चंचल सफेद बोर्ड मार्कर स्याही से संबंधित है और जब मैं इसके साथ पुष्टि नहीं करूंगा, तो मैं किसी भी कंपनी के खिलाफ पर्याप्त सबूत होने से पहले किसी भी कंपनी के खिलाफ शिकायत करने से पहले पूरा सबूत इकट्ठा किया कंपनी को भूले वाले नागरिक को बेवकूफ नहीं बनाना चाहिए

Bhoomika Singh
Bhoomika Singh
4 months ago

To stop the processing at the last stage is the part of the cryptic dealings of the concerned public functionaries which must not be promoted because such cryptic dealings only targeted to conceal the information from information seeker so that concerned public functionaries maybe safeguarded from to be exposed in public domain because if the information will be provided and this information will come in public domain then wrongdoing will be exposed.