Why home secretary is running away from providing sought information if every thing is O.K.

Gmail Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
मामला गृह सचिव उत्तर प्रदेश शासन से सम्बंधित है क्यों की उनका रोल एक सुपरवाइजरी बाड़ी का है |
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 7 December 2019 at 00:02
To: shome@nic.in, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, hgovup@up.nic.in, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, csup@up.nic.in
श्री मान जी गृह सचिव महोदय से सम्बंधित पत्र ऑनलाइन ट्रैकिंग अभी तक डिलीवरी नही बता रहा है जब की डिलीवरी
२५-नवम्बर -२०१९ को ही हो गया | श्री मान जी इस तरह की रहस्यमयी डीलिंग सिर्फ महानिबंधक उच्च न्यायालय इलाहबाद या
गृह सचिव उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार जैसे दिग्मागजों के मामलो में ही होता है या भारत सरकार के जितने महत्वपूर्ण पदासीन लोकसेवक
है सभी ऐसा करते है | कितना कष्टदाई है की सरकारी सुबिधाए भी भेद भाव के पश्चात उपलब्ध कराइ जाती है | कहा है पारदर्शिता
और जवाबदेही जब हर जगह भ्रष्टाचार ही होगा | श्री मान जी गृह सचिव जैसा जिम्मेदार पद जनसूचना आवेदन को प्राप्त करने के
पश्चात चुप्पी साधे रहे क्या यही सुशासन है | सभी को न्याय प्राप्त करने का समान अधिकार है और सभी को विधि द्वारा समान सुरक्षा
हासिल है फिर यह भेद भाव कैसा | क्यों जवाबदेही से कुछ लोग भाग रहे है क्यों की वे जानते है की उनके मातहत कुछ ऐसा कर दिए
है जिससे विभाग को शर्मशार होना पड रहा है | मै सत्य कहता हूँ  सखे सुकुमार मत जानो मुझे | यमराज से भी युद्ध में प्रस्तुत सदा जानो
मुझे || और की तो बात क्या गर्व मै करता नही | मामा तथा निज तात से भी समर में डरता नही || ऐसे बीर योद्धाओ के बंशज  एक छोटे से
जन सूचना आवेदन से भाग रहे है |क्या कहेगा इतिहास |
Booked At
Booked On
Destination Pincode
Tariff
Article Type
Delivery Location
Mirzapur City SO
22/11/2019 13:03:27
226001
32.00
Registered Post
Lucknow GPO
Event Details For : RU525418145IN
Current Status : Item Bagged

 

Date
Time
Office
Event
24/11/2019
16:21:31
CRC Lucknow RMS
Item Bagged
24/11/2019
11:50:21
CRC Lucknow RMS
Item Received
23/11/2019
04:33:27
Mirzapur RMS L2R
Item Bagged
22/11/2019
23:08:10
Mirzapur RMS L2R
Item Received
22/11/2019
13:03:27
Mirzapur City SO
Item Booked
Grievance Status for registration number : DPOST/E/2019/29905
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant-Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt-29/11/2019
Received By Ministry/Department-Posts
Grievance Description-Posts >> Delay/ Non – Delivery/Abstraction of Postal Articles >> Domestic >>
Registered letters/
Registered letters with acknowledgement
Track/Trace No. : RU525418145IN
Post Office of Booking/PINCODE : 226001
Division : SSLKO
———————–
Matter is urgent but concerned staffs are procrastinating since five days. All the requisite information is attached with the
grievance so take a glance of them for proceedings in the matter.
Grievance Document Current Status-Case closed
Date of Action-06/12/2019 Remarks-Please find the attachment.
Reply Document Rating-Poor
Rating Remarks-Indeed such business can not be credible as if it was delivered they had to show it online tracking but
applicant was deprived of it because of dereliction of duty of the concerned staffs. Whether it is justified to deprive citizenry
of its rights arbitrarily is justified as done by the concerned staffs of the postal department of the government of India.I think
that this is not the first such event as once similar event took place when the speed post was sent to registrar general, High
court of judicature at Allahabad and during the hearing in the Central Information Commission they denied that they did not
receive the appeal sent by the appellant but I the proof but unfortunately I had no proof during the hearing latter I made
representation but chief information commissioner of India did not take the perusal of my authentic evidences provided by the
department of post. Undoubtedly such illegality at behest of influential people must not be promoted in the system. Thanks
Officer Concerns To Officer Name-R N Yadav
Officer Designation-CHIEF POSTMASTER LKO GPO
Contact Address-CHIEF POSTMASTER LUCKNOW GPO LUCKNOW
Contact Number-05222237908
Reminder(s) / Clarification(s)
Reminder Date Remarks-29/11/2019
Sir matter is urgent but communication did not reach to destination still is a matter of great concern consequently take
appropriate action in the matter under intimation to the applicant. Following is the current status of the registered post sent by
the aggrieved applicant. Please ensure the delivery as soon as possible otherwise in case of denial by concerned office
communication must be returned back to address of the sender after appropriate proceedings. Mirzapur City SO 22/11/2019
13:03:27 226001 32.00 Registered Post Lucknow GPO Event Details For : RU525418145IN Current Status : Item Bagged
Date Time Office Event 24/11/2019 16:21:31 CRC Lucknow RMS Item Bagged 24/11/2019 11:50:21 CRC Lucknow RMS
Item Received 23/11/2019 04:33:27 Mirzapur RMS L2R Item Bagged 22/11/2019 23:08:10 Mirzapur RMS L2R Item
Received 22/11/2019 13:03:27 Mirzapur City SO Item Booked

 

On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 at 02:23, Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> wrote:

 

  Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006 श्री मान गृह सचिव महोदय प्रतिवादी
संख्या -१ है इसलिए  माननीय उच्च न्यायालय के आदेश का अनुपालन सुनिश्चित करना
उनकी जिम्मेदारी सर्वोपरि थी | किन्तु जिस तरह से लखनऊ आशियाना थाने का थानाध्यक्ष
कल्याण सिंह सागर ने उच्च न्यायालय के आदेश को दरकिनार करके मानवता को शर्मशार
करने वाली घटना को अंजाम दिया है और खुद को सक्षम न्यायालय बना  कर न्याय किया
है उससे न्यायालय, शासन और पुलिस सभी को शर्मसार होना चाहिए और स्थिति स्पष्ट
करना चाहिए किन्तु आप की चुप्पी महोदय खुद रहस्यमयी है | इससे बड़ा भ्रष्टाचार का
उदाहरण कहा मिलेगा की माननीय उच्च न्यायालय के स्पष्ट आदेश के बावजूद प्रदेश
सचिवालय के नाक के नीचे लखनऊ पुलिस मकान कब्जा करवा दी जो की श्री मान जी
की ओर से उच्च न्यायालय में प्रस्तुत हलफनामा जो की उपनिरीक्षक द्वारा प्रस्तुत किया
गया था उसको झूठा साबित कर दिए अर्थात आप द्वारा माननीय उच्च न्यायालय को
गुमराह किया गया |
जनसूचना अधिकार २००५ के तहत मागी गयी सूचनाओं को न दे कर सिर्फ यही सिद्ध
किया जा रहा है की आज भी वरिष्ठ पुलिस अधिकारी मामले पर पर्दा दाल रहे है और
भ्रष्टाचार को छुपा रहे है जो किसी ढंग से उचित नही है | कृपया मामले की गंभीरता को
समझते हुए नियमानुसार कार्यवाही करे और प्रार्थी को सूचना उपलब्ध कराये जो की लोक
हित में होगा |
An appeal under subsection 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information
Act 2005 as PIO did not consider it fit to even communicate to the
information seeker.
To
                                                            First Appellate Authority in the
                                                   office of Principal Secretary, Department of Home
District-Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, PIN Code-226004
Prayer-Public Information Officer not only violated subsection 1 of section 7 of the Right to
Information Act 2005 but acted against the spirit of the august act by adopting a reluctant
approach to the R.T.I. Communique dated 06/10/2019 which was received in the office of
PIO on 10/10/2019 quite obvious from online tracking of the speed post which is given
below for perusal of Hon’ble Sir.
Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect
to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following is the online tracking of the speed
registered post through which aforementioned R.T.I. Communique was sent.
Event Details For EU787012644IN
Current Status: Item Delivery Confirmed
Date
Time
Office
Event
10/10/2019
17:56:38
Lucknow GPO
Item Delivery Confirmed
10/10/2019
12:17:41
Lucknow GPO
Out for Delivery
09/10/2019
09:26:43
Lucknow GPO
Item Received
08/10/2019
03:54:06
Lucknow NSH
Item Dispatched
08/10/2019
00:53:01
Lucknow NSH
Item Bagged
07/10/2019
23:32:58
Lucknow NSH
Item Received
07/10/2019
05:51:53
MA Mirzapur TMO
Item Dispatched
07/10/2019
05:44:19
MA Mirzapur TMO
Received at TMO
07/10/2019
01:03:57
Mirzapur ICH
Item Dispatched
07/10/2019
00:56:13
Mirzapur ICH
Item Bagged
06/10/2019
20:28:06
Mirzapur ICH
Item Received
06/10/2019
20:13:53
Mirzapur RMS POS Counter
Item Dispatched
06/10/2019
20:12:54
Mirzapur RMS POS Counter
Item Bagged
06/10/2019
19:34:22
Mirzapur RMS POS Counter
Item Booked
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that through aforementioned R.T.I. Application
dated- 06/10/2019 received in the office of public authority on 10/10/2019, the following
information was sought.
CPIO may be directed to provide the following information point wise as sought.
Most respected Superintendent of police, District Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, the applicant aggrieved Dinesh Pratap
Singh, wants to draw the kind attention of the revered Sir to the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High
court of Judicature at Allahabad in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006 as follows It is simply ordered that
the respondent number 4 to 7 shall open the lock of the staircase so that Smt Anuradha Singh the petitioner may
come out of the house and take the proper and appropriate remedy in the competent court and after that, she may
have the liberty to go anywhere. Since it is not a case in the strict sense of illegal detention, therefore, no direction
can be issued to the respondent to produce the detenue in the court and allow her to live free at her home but since
she can not take necessary steps for taking the remedy in the competent court, therefore it is simply ordered that
the alleged detenue Smt Anuradha Singh shall be allowed to go out of the house and respondent number 4 to 7 shall
open the lock of the door and open the door so that Smt Anuradha Singh may come out and take appropriate remedy.
Dated-07/03/2006 Signed by the concerned Honourable Justices of Division bench of Lucknow.
1-Please provide the G.O./Circular/Legislation which empowers the Lucknow police as the competent court having the
power to grant the civil remedies or if any constitutional functionary delegated any such power as aforementioned
must be revealed to information seeker in detail.
2-Please, provide access to information regarding the reasoned decision taken by the S.S.P.
Lucknow in the grievances aforementioned and which detail is available as page 1 and page 2
of the annexure. Right to reason is an indispensable part of the sound administrative
system.
Applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the respondent number First who is Secretary of home
department, civil secretariat, Government of Uttar Pradesh and respondent number second who is senior
superintendent of police Lucknow as well as the station house officer police station Ashiyana who is the
respondent number 3 in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006 filed in the Lucknow bench of the
High court of Judicature at Allahabad filed by Anuradha Singh also named Guddi also named Aradhana
Singh through her mother Beena Singh wife of Brijraj Singh also Beena Singh wife of Netrpal Singh.
Whether in the same matter, to get remedy from various redressal bodies and get public aid by changing
the name is not illegal? This lady took the land of LDA by bearing the name of Guddi daughter of Brijraj
Singh and in order to seek remedy from High court of Judicature at Allahabad, she took the new name
Anuradha Singh and now she has been Aradhna Singh whether it is not a mockery of the law of land? Sir,
please take a glance of the affidavit submitted by the sub-inspector Satyesh Prakash Dwivedi in the Writ
Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006. This affidavit is on behalf of the respondent number-1, 2 and 3 so it
is the responsibility of concerned to maintain the sanctity of the affidavit. Sir order of the High court of
judicature was for respondent number 1.2 and 3. Sir how can it be justified that Aradhna changed name of
Guddi and Anuradha could manage the support of respondent number 1, 2 and 3 to get illegal possession of the
land and house of the applicant by robbing the household articles of the applicant and fabricating the false
charges not only on the applicant but also on his wife and daughter? Whether this step of the aforementioned
respondents had not undermined the authority of High court of judicature and against the spirit of the
affidavit submitted by them through the aforementioned sub-inspector as the spirit of the affidavit was
crushed by them? Whether High court of judicature had ordered to slap false and fabricated charges on the
applicant and his wife and daughter as a conspiracy to provide illegal possession to Anuradha Singh now
Aradhana Singh and loot the valuables of the applicant by breaking the Locks of rooms? Whether it was the
motive of the High court in passing the order that police may play the role of a competent court and
competent administrative body as ordered in the writ of multi named personality Anuradha Singh to seek a
civil remedy before the competent court? Whether the civil remedy is provided by the police in this largest
democracy in the world and the police is the competent court?
3-Please provide the detail of the privileges granted to Lucknow police specially Ashiyana
police station which not only overlooked the direction of the Lucknow bench of the High
court of judicature at Allahabad but also persecuted not only the applicant but also slapped
serious charges on the wife and daughter of the information seeker.
4-Please, provide access to information which caused the police to submit forged documents
before the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad on behalf of
respondent number -1,2 and 3 as later all those documents were declare forged when police
acted to provide civil remedy as competent court in order to comply the order passed by
High court.
5-Please provide the detail of name and designation of the staffs of the Lucknow police who
remained instrumental in declaring the impugned land and house of the applicant as the
property of Aradhana Singh and robbing the household valuables by breaking the locks of
rooms when family fled from the terror of police, third name of the multi named Lady.
For more detail, vide attached R.T.I. Communique in the P.D.F. form.
 3-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that in subsection 2 of section 7 of the Right
to Information Act 2005 stated as follows-
  (2) If the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the
case may be, fails to give decision on the request for information within the period specified
under sub-section (1), the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information
Officer, as the case may be, shall be deemed to have refused the request.
 4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005
No. 22 of 2005
[15th June, 2005.] An Act to provide for setting out the practical regime of right to
information for citizens to secure access to information under the control of public
authorities, in order to promote transparency and accountability in the working of every
public authority. Whether cryptic denial of the sought information by taking provisions of
transparency act under teeth would be plausible by misinterpreting the provisions of the
Right to Information Act 2005? Undoubtedly act of PIO is ultra vires to august act i.e,
Right to Information Act 2005 and reflection of the sheer insolence.
5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that since the working of public authority is not
transparent and accountable and corruption is rampant in its office so they are not
providing sought information. According to subsection 1 d section 4 of the Right to
Information Act 2005, it shall be the obligatory duty of every public authority to provide
the reasons for its decisions to the parties concerned but here PIO is only seated/
procrastinating on the R.T.I. Application nothing else.
                              This is a humble request of the applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can
it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness, and
chaos in an arbitrary manner by making the mockery of law of land? This is the need of the
hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer in order to win the confidence of citizenry
and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your
applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.                                                         
 Please provide the aforementioned sought information point wise as sought by the information seeker.
For this applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.
Date-22/11/2019                                         Yours sincerely
                                                      Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Mr Angad Prasad Singh
C/O Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, Lakshmi Narayan
Baikunth Mahadev Mandir District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.

 

 

5 comments on Why home secretary is running away from providing sought information if every thing is O.K.

  1. सभी को न्याय प्राप्त करने का समान अधिकार है और सभी को विधि द्वारा समान सुरक्षा हासिल है फिर यह भेद भाव कैसा | क्यों जवाबदेही से कुछ लोग भाग रहे है क्यों की वे जानते है की उनके मातहत कुछ ऐसा कर दिए है जिससे विभाग को शर्मशार होना पड रहा है | मै सत्य कहता हूँ सखे सुकुमार मत जानो मुझे | यमराज से भी युद्ध में प्रस्तुत सदा जानो मुझे || और की तो बात क्या गर्व मै करता नही | मामा तथा निज तात से भी समर में डरता नही || ऐसे बीर योद्धाओ के बंशज एक छोटे से जन सूचना आवेदन से भाग रहे है |क्या कहेगा इतिहास |

  2. Whether High court of judicature had ordered to slap false and fabricated charges on the applicant and his wife and daughter as a conspiracy to provide illegal possession to Anuradha Singh later on Aradhana Singh and police looted the valuables of the applicant by breaking the Locks of rooms? Whether it was the motive of the High court in passing the order that police may play the role of a competent court and competent administrative body as ordered in the writ of multi named personality Anuradha Singh to seek a civil remedy before the competent court? Whether the civil remedy is provided by the police in this largest democracy in the world and the police is the competent court?

  3. जनसूचना अधिकार २००५ के तहत मागी गयी सूचनाओं को न दे कर सिर्फ यही सिद्ध किया जा रहा है की आज भी वरिष्ठ पुलिस अधिकारी मामले पर पर्दा दाल रहे है और भ्रष्टाचार को छुपा रहे है जो किसी ढंग से उचित नही है | कृपया मामले की गंभीरता को समझते हुए नियमानुसार कार्यवाही करे और प्रार्थी को सूचना उपलब्ध कराये जो की लोकहित में होगा | To seek information under Right to Information Act 2005 is the Right of the citizenry but because of Rampant corruption in the public offices in the Uttar Pradesh, public information officers are not providing the sought information.

  4. I don’t think that they will provide the sought information as there is rampant corruption in the government machinery. How much surprising is that they overlooked the High court order in the matter and lodged the F.I.R. not only against the aggrieved Dinesh Pratap Singh but also his wife and daughter.

  5. Whether it is not the reflection of Anarchy in this largest populous state in this largest democracy in the world? It seems that we are living in not a democratic republic but in a banana Republic ipso facto obvious.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: