Why Home ministry ,government of India is procrastinating on the submitted grievances ?

Grievance Status

Print || Logout
Status as on 27 Jul 2016

Registration Number : MINHA/E/2016/03456
Name Of Complainant : Yogi M P Singh
Date of Receipt : 27 Jul 2016
Received by : Ministry of Home Affairs
Officer name : Shri V. Shashank Shekhar
Officer Designation : Joint Secretary C &amp PG
Contact Address : Room No. 188,
North Block,
New Delhi110001
Contact Number : 23092392
e-mail : jscpg-mha@nic.in
Grievance Description : When Home ministry /CRPF will refund additional charged fee to the account of your applicant.How C.R.P.F. Website can take four times fee against single application of Alok Bhardwaj and two times fee against the single application of Mohammad Akaram. After fee payment ,application is considered to be complete but how website accepted multiple fee payments against single applications. Most surprising was that print was allowed after multiple payments against single application and concerned still not refunded the excess amount taken by them from the account of account holder. 27 July 2016 21:22 With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows. 1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that procrastination of the accountable public functionaries in redressing the following grievance is the reflection of insolence and ulterior designs of the concerned. Registration Number: MINHA/E/2016/01980 ,Name Of Complainant : Yogi M P Singh Date of Receipt : 08 May 2016. 2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that procrastination of the accountable public functionaries in redressing the following grievance is the reflection of insolence and ulterior designs of the concerned. Registration Number : MINHA/E/2016/02176 , Name Of Complainant : Yogi M P Singh, Date of Receipt : 19 May 2016. 3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that procrastination of the accountable public functionaries in redressing the following grievance is the reflection of insolence and ulterior designs of the concerned. Registration Number : MINHA/E/2016/01793 ,Name Of Complainant : Yogi M P Singh , Date of Receipt: 27 Apr 2016. 4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that procrastination of the accountable public functionaries in redressing the following grievance is the reflection of insolence and ulterior designs of the concerned. Registration Number : MINHA/E/2016/01980 , Name Of Complainant : Yogi M P Singh Date of Receipt : 08 May 2016 . For detail please take a glance attached documents. This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir. ‘Yours sincerely Yogi M. P. Singh Mobile number-7379105911 Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India .
Current Status : RECEIVED THE GRIEVANCE

2 comments on Why Home ministry ,government of India is procrastinating on the submitted grievances ?

  1. When Home ministry /CRPF will refund additional charged fee to the account of your applicant.How C.R.P.F. Website can take four times fee against single application of Alok Bhardwaj and two times fee against the single application of Mohammad Akaram. After fee payment ,application is considered to be complete but how website accepted multiple fee payments against single applications. Most surprising was that print was allowed after multiple payments against single application and concerned still not refunded the excess amount taken by them from the account of account holder.

  2. My family is on the verge of hunger ,please home ministry_C.R.P.F.pdf 4-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that since the additional deducted amount from the account of your applicant was still not refunded so it is proving nefarious designs concerned public functionaries as more than two dozen letters /representations submitted by your applicant. It is unfortunate that no action is taken against wrongdoers in this largest democracy in the world.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: