Why government is not serious on issue of providing support to bereaved family of slain RTI Activist

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P
Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Daylight murder of the RTI Activist is the failure of
state government so government may provide support to bereaved family as done
in the case of Govt staffs.
Account Security <lokayukta@hotmail.com>
12
February 2019 at 18:18
To: Mahesh Pratap
Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Case
No 160-2019
information
book let 
From: Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M
P Singh <
yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 4:04 PM
To: pmosb; presidentofindia@rb.nic.in; supremecourt; urgent-action; cmup; hgovup@up.nic.in; csup@up.nic.in; uphrclko; lokayukta@hotmail.com; sec. sic; Anjali Anand Srivastava
Subject: Daylight murder of the RTI Activist is the failure of state
government so government may provide support to bereaved family as done in
the case of Govt staffs.
The matter is concerned with the
daylight murder of the RTI Activist in District –Mau, published
with the broad headings in most of the dailies of the
state. Tragic incidence took place at Badhua Godam Patti in the Mau District
at 8 O clock in the morning. Detail is available in the attached JPG images
with this representation.
Subject-Government aid may be provided to the bereaved family of the deceased.
Most
revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of the Hon’ble
Sir with due respect to following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that undoubtedly RTI Activist martyred
for a
 public cause
so it is the
 obligation of governments both at the centre and state provide all those
helps which are provided to a government staff. Whatever riskey job was
undertaken by the revered departed soul was to pursued by the accountable
public functionaries in the state but instead of taking any positive steps
for the betterment of society could not secure the life of the public
spirited individual is the failure of the government machinery in the state.
On one side of screen few public functionaries claim to be honest but on the
other side of screen really honest people in the state are being killed is
not proved contrary. If someone is really honest undoubtedly he will have
sympathy to the people murdered because of pursuing the path of the
anticorruption crusade.
2-It
is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that undoubtedly murder of the RTI
Activist is not a good signal for the government of the Uttar Pradesh and is
reflection of the failure of the law order mechanism in the state. Here role
of the police is itself under cloud as the matter was under the investigation
by the district police and the individual instituted the complaint was
targeted by the offenders against whom charges were alleged. Whether there is
no need to investigate the role of the police concerned who were carrying out
the investigation on the complaint submitted by the deceased with supporting
documents obtained under Right to Information Act 2005?
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
after Dr Manmohan Singh and now the regime of Narendra Modi at the verge of
ending but no solid and strong steps taken by the governments installed at
the centre and state in regard to the protection of the R.T.I. Activists in
this largest populous state of the largest democracy in the world. 
The direction of D.G.P. doesn’t
reach to subordinates in a state of Uttar Pradesh. In this state
police personnel are governed by their own rule as don’t care what directions
their superintendent has issued or what circular has been circulated from
their head office. These surprising facts came when an RTI Activist
Advocate Mr Gaurav Agarval sought information concerned with the
security of RTI Activists in the state. According to state
home department, nocircular/order has been issued in concerned with the
security of RTI activists. While the D.G.P. office
revealed contrary facts that directives concerned with the security
of RTI Activists in the state have been issued to zonal offices and
units in the month of June 2011. D.G.P. office also informed aforesaid
advocate that joint secretary of
the home department of central government had
issued guidelines in regard to security of RTI activists in March
2011. It is true fact that law order is state subject and
to safeguard the life and property of people of
the state is the duty of state government. Why state government is
adopting a lackadaisical approach in regard to compliance
of directives of the central government concerned with the
security of RTI Activists cumwhistleblowers? The
government of Uttar Pradesh is also adopting
a lackadaisical approach in the compliance of
orders passed by the members of transparency panel. Why state
functionaries are wreaking vengeance with public-spirited persons
even when they are supporting the government in fishing out corrupts from the
system?
This is a humble request of your
applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public
services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos in an
arbitrary manner by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the
hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer in order to win the confidence
of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous
democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir. 
                          
                   
Yours sincerely
Date-17-01-2019       
      Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, 
9336252631, 9794103433, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road,
District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh

Modi’s call

While inaugurating CIC Bhawan, the newly-constructed premises of the commission at New Delhi, on March 6, the prime minister highlighted the efforts made by various central government departments and agencies to bring more transparency in the implementation of social development programmes across the country. He underlined the importance of “informing people” in order to “empower them” and ensure their participation in governance.

Preeti Singh
1 year ago

Daylight murder of the RTI Activist is the failure of state government so government may provide support to bereaved family as done in the case of Govt staffs.मै समझता हु शायद ही इस भ्रस्टाचार तंत्र में कोई विरला ही आर.टी.आई. एक्टिविस्ट के बारे में सोचे |उससे मन ही मन चिढ़ते होंगे खुश हुए होंगे चलिए झंझट टला| आज हम पतन की ओर है न तो संस्कृत बची न ही हम बचे |

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M. P. Singh

In our constitution duties of centre and states are allocated and according to this provision of constitution Law order is a state subject. Now it is crystal clear that RTI activist was murdered is the failure of state machinery so state government is accountable for the murder of RTI activist so it is obligatory duty of the Government of Uttar Pradesh to provide the compensation to the bereaved family so that they can take forward their life otherwise the family will ruin which will be the sole responsibility of the state. Undoubtedly RTI activist was murdered when he was exposing the wrong deeds of the public servants which was the oblique obligatory duty of the intelligence of the state so he was performing a public work when his death took place so he maybe not be overlooked.