Why CPIO ,High Court of judicature at Allahabad is not furnishing sought information to information seeker

Case Status – Allahabad
Pending
Writ – A / 20121 /
2006 [Mirzapur]
Petitioner:
RAJENDRA PRATAP
SINGH
Respondent:
STATE OF U.P. AND
OTHERS
Counsel (Pet.):
P.C. CHAUHAN
Counsel (Res.):
C.S.C.
Category:
Service-Writ
Petitions Relating To Secondary Education (non Teaching Staff) (single
Bench)-Salary And Allowances
Date of Filing:
10/04/2006
Last Listed on:
25/11/2016 in
Court No. 1
Next Listing Date:
To be listed on
02/08/2017
This is not an authentic/certified copy of the information
regarding status of a case. Authentic/certified information may be obtained
under Chapter VIII Rule 30 of Allahabad High Court Rules. Mistake, if any, may
be brought to the notice of OSD (Computer).

2 comments on Why CPIO ,High Court of judicature at Allahabad is not furnishing sought information to information seeker

  1. Case Status – Allahabad

    Pending

    Writ – A / 20121 / 2006 [Mirzapur]

    Petitioner:
    RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH
    Respondent:
    STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
    Counsel (Pet.):
    P.C. CHAUHAN
    Counsel (Res.):
    C.S.C.
    Category:
    Service-Writ Petitions Relating To Secondary Education (non Teaching Staff) (single Bench)-Salary And Allowances
    Date of Filing:
    10/04/2006
    Last Listed on:
    25/11/2016 in Court No. 1
    Next Listing Date:
    To be listed on 02/08/2017

  2. Undoubtedly honesty is the reflection of good governance but here in most of the offices no files move without greasing the palm of concerned. Our judiciary is also not untouchable from this menace. Here most unfortunate is that there is rampant bargaining in judiciary and no accountable public functionaries are paying due care in order eliminate it from the society.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: