Why chief secretary office is adopting lackadaisical approach in providing sought information ?

Please direct public information officer in the office of chief secretary ,Government of Uttar Pradesh to provide sought information as sought through the R.T.I. Communique dated 24-March-2014. .


Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh yogimpsingh@gmail.com

11:01 AM (13 minutes ago)

to urgent-actionpmosbsupremecourtddpg2-arpgsecypghgovupcsupcmupsec.sic
   An appeal under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005.As the order dated 28-March-2014 was not complied by the concerned.  Office of chief secretary Government of Uttar Pradesh transferred the RTI communique dated 24.03.2014 to public information officer ,department of personnel /home of Government of Uttar Pradesh through its letter no. 1442 /C.S./RTI/2014 dated-28-March-2014 .

According to the letter of chief secretary office as copy was made available to Yogi M. P. Singh as information of transfer of RTI communique as-
Mr. Yogi M. P. Singh Mohalla-Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road ,District-Mirzapur sought information through letter dated-24.03.2014 , under Right to Information Act 2005 from this office concerned to your department. Postal order of Rs.10 is enclosed with this RTI communique. Aforesaid RTI communique was received by this office on 27.03.2014 .Therefore this RTI communique is transferred under subsection 3 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005 to you for information and necessary action.
Annexure as stated aforesaid.
                                                      (Chandra Prakash )
                                                Personal secretary and public information officer ,chief secretary , Government of Uttar Pradesh.

Registered Post Dated-24.03.2014
To,                                                         
        Chief secretary , Government of Uttar Pradesh , Lucknow (U.P.)
An application under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005.
                               Short submissions.
Hon’ble Sir-Plese take a glance of e-mail representation as-
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
7:18 PM (3 minutes ago)
to supremecourt, pmosb, cj, cmup, csup, hgovup, uphrclko, secypg, urgent-action, ddpg2-arpg

Registration Number
:
GOVUP/E/2013/00007
Name Of Complainant
:
Yogi M P Singh
Date of Receipt
:
04 Jan 2013
Received by
:
Government of Uttar Pradesh
Officer name
:
Shri Yogendra Dutt Tripathi
Officer Designation
:
Under Secretary (PG)
Contact Address
:
Chief Minister Secretariat

U.P. Secretariat,

Lucknow226001
Contact Number
:
05222215137
Grievance Description
:
Hon’ble Sir-With due respect .your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows. 1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that your applicant is sending the judgement delivered by Hon’ble Apex court declaring strikes even by political parties as illegal.Court didn’t provide relief to strikers when action taken by concerned state government. 2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that your applicant wants that when strikes are illegal then principle of no work no pay must be imposed on strikers employees which will justified in view of your applicant. Even promoters of strikes must not be spared. 3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that your applicant wants that salary of striking period of strikers should not be paid by the concerned otherwise it would be tantamount to sheer contempt of court if such malpractice is taking place ,then your applicant may be informed so that Hon’ble Apex court may be requested to take action against erring staff. This is humble request to you Hon’ble Sir to direct concerned departments to deduct the salary of strikers of striking period in public interest as required by law. If salary paid will be illegal and may be deducted from the salary of those who payed. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir. Yours sincerely Yogi M. P. Singh, Moh-Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur(U.P.)
Current Status
:
RECEIVED THE GRIEVANCE

2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether it is justified that several highly educated unemployed youths are on the verge of hunger along with their family and those some how managed to get job in the government departments resorting to illegal strikes by keeping entire system on ransom in order to get their salary to limitless hike.http://yogimpsingh.blogspot.com/2013/11/at-charge-of-dm-mirzapur-cdo-vivek.html
We need social equity as we teach eight hours daily but on the verge of hunger and those who don’t teach single class are drawing Rs50000.00 per month. Whether this is not disparity. Why our lawmakers don’t think about it ? Those drawing Rs.80000.00 amassed more property disproportionate to their known source of income and now indirectly hatching this drama.
This is humble request that report of each day must be prepared and strikers at any cost may not be paid their salary of striking period as the need of hour. Public fund is not private property senior bureaucrats and politicians/executives. Hunger destroys the discretion of man. Please provide justice to people like me. This indefinite strike called by Government staff will only cause troublesome  to poor and downtrodden . Please don’t create disparity in society and think about poor and downtrodden.
Yours sincerely     
Yogi M. P. Singh
 Mohalla-Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur ,State-Uttar Pradesh  Country-India. 
With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows. 1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that your applicant submitted grievance in regard to deduct the salary of employees who were on strike illegally as Hon’ble Apex has declared the strikes illegal in India but concerned staff of Government of Uttar Pradesh only receives the grievance but never process it. Please take a glance of status as on 13 Nov 2013 and also take a glance of following link-http://yogimpsingh.blogspot.com/2013/02/if-district-magistrate-may-support.htmlStatus of the Grievance as on 13 Nov 2013
2 attachments — Download all attachments  
Salary of strikers of striking period must be deducted from their salary.pdf
265K   View   Download  
Strikes are illegal as proclaimed by Apex court.pdf
514K   View   Download  

Pasted from <http://yogimpsingh.blogspot.in/2013/11/when-strikes-are-illegal-in-india-then_6615.html?showComment=1395652097061>
When apex court has declared the strikes of Government employees illegal and no work no pay principle is applied on the  employees gone on strike ,then how the earned leave of employee can substitute those days when he was on strike. 

Pasted from <http://yogimpsingh.blogspot.in/2013/11/whether-earned-leave-can-substitute.html?showComment=1395652097061>
On Thursday ,pro-strikers in the state capital made uproar in the development building ,broken the public articles and in order to terrorize the staff of Government who were performing their duty on their desks , fire was made in air.

Pasted from <http://yogimpsingh.blogspot.in/2013/11/whether-it-is-justified-to-create.html?showComment=1395652097061>
The Court is to be apprised the actual steps, which have been taken by entering into dialogues, in respect to the demands of the employees’ Union and in the event of non-acceptance of the suggestions/ offers, which are reasonable, and the action, in accordance with law, which has been taken. 
Our attention has been drawn to the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of T.K. Rangarajan v. Govt. of Tamil Nadu and others, AIR 2003 SC 3032. The Court has held that apart from the statutory rights, the government employee cannot take the society at ransom by going on strike, even if, there is some injustice to some extent as presumed by them. 

Pasted from <http://yogimpsingh.blogspot.in/2013/11/government-employee-cannot-take-society.html>

                                 Sought Information.
1-Please made available the copy of counter affidavit submitted by the government of uttar pradesh to High court.
2-What action was taken by Government of Uttar Pradesh on the submissions of your applicant ? Please made available the noting on the representation of your applicant as aforesaid.
3-How much loss incurred to public exchequer because of this long lasting strike called by few employee unions in order to pressurize the government.
4-Whether action was taken against few leaders who indulged in criminal activity during the strike.
5-Whether the principle of no work no pay was applied on strikers as the strikes are declared illegal by apex court of India.
6-Who afforded the huge loss incurred on public exchequer  due to this long lasted strike call by strikers under which provision  of law of land.    
Prayer-Please direct public information officer to made available the sought information within time as prescribed under subsection 1 of section 7 of Right to Information Act 2005.
Please take glance of annexure  as postal order of Rs.10.00 in the favour of Account officer  ,chief secretary office ,Government of Uttar Pradesh , as R.T.I. fee as prescribed under Right to Information Act 2005. 25F 508238  
This is humble request to you Hon’ble Sir that aforesaid sought information be made available to
                                     
                                                                                                             Yogi M. P. Singh
        Mohalla-Surekapuram ,Jabalpur Road
      District-Mirzapur ,State-Uttar Pradesh ,                      India

2 comments on Why chief secretary office is adopting lackadaisical approach in providing sought information ?

  1. Sought Information.
    1-Please made available the copy of counter affidavit submitted by the government of uttar pradesh to High court.
    2-What action was taken by Government of Uttar Pradesh on the submissions of your applicant ? Please made available the noting on the representation of your applicant as aforesaid.
    3-How much loss incurred to public exchequer because of this long lasting strike called by few employee unions in order to pressurize the government.
    4-Whether action was taken against few leaders who indulged in criminal activity during the strike.
    5-Whether the principle of no work no pay was applied on strikers as the strikes are declared illegal by apex court of India.
    6-Who afforded the huge loss incurred on public exchequer due to this long lasted strike call by strikers under which provision of law of land.
    Prayer-Please direct public information officer to made available the sought information within time as prescribed under subsection 1 of section 7 of Right to Information Act 2005.

  2. Here one thing is troublesome for me that when the R.T.I. Communique was transferred as "Office of chief secretary Government of Uttar Pradesh transferred the RTI communique dated 24.03.2014 to public information officer ,department of personnel /home of Government of Uttar Pradesh through its letter no. 1442 /C.S./RTI/2014 dated-28-March-2014" Here this question arises that when chief secretary issued the order that strikers will not be paid the salary of striking period ,then such information must be available in the office of chief secretary and why the office is running away from the accountability of providing the sought information. Why the R.T.I. Communique was transferred to subordinate office. Since the subordinate office didn't make available sought information so it seems that transfer of RTI communique was preplanned strategy. It seems that staff of Government of Uttar Pradesh considers the RTI communiques as its main foe. .

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: