Why chief information commissioner is adopting lackadaisical approach in redressing the grievances?


Why UPSIC didn’t make available sought information even after the second appeal?

  

Add star  

Yogi M. P. Singh

<yogimpsingh@gmail.com>

AttachmentFri, Aug 14, 2015 at 10:02 PM
To: pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, hgovup@up.nic.in, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, csup <csup@up.nic.in>
Why UPSIC didn’t make available sought information even after the second appeal?
14 August 2015
20:13
Hon’ble Sir -Job of UPSIC is  to be instrumental in providing sought information to information seeker but here UPSIC itself withholding the sought information. Whether such system will not lose its credibility in the eye of citizenry. This is obligatory duty of the accountable public functionaries of constitutional institutions to maintain the dignity and integrity of the office so the faith of people of state may remain intact . Here most startling fact is that concerned staff didn’t consider it appropriate to correspond in regard to RTI Communique which is sheer unjustified and grass violation of provisions of Right to Information Act 2005.
 With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that chief secretary office sent following e-mail to your applicant which is attached with this representation in detail. Here this question arises that why action was not taken by the chief information commissioner UPSIC on this appeal?
CSUP <csup@nic.in> Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:41 PM
To: “Yogi M. P. Singh” <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
mail recd.
Original
Message From:
“Yogi M. P. Singh” <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 3:33 pm
Subject: To direct chief information commissioner , Government of Uttar Pradesh to be instrumental in providing sought
information.
To: ‘pmosb’ <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, sec.sic@up.nic.in, ‘supremecourt’ <supremecourt@nic.in>, ‘urgentaction’
<urgentaction@
To direct chief information commissioner , Government of Uttar Pradesh
to be instrumental in providing sought information.
14 January 2015
12:54
An appeal under subsection 3 of section 19 of Right to
Information Act 2005.
To
Chief Information commissioner,
Government of uttar pradesh
Indira Bhawan ,sixth floor, Lucknow (U.P.)
SubjectSince the sought information is concerned with the
working of the office of chief information commissioner
,Government of uttar pradesh so his/her PIO must be directed to
made available point wise information as sought through RTI
communique dated 27.10.2014.
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether any action was taken on the following e-mail representation . Whether it is not signal chaos and lawlessness culminating into sheer anarchy. Whether the system is not handicapped to provide justice to poor and downtrodden section.
My inner conscious don’t allow to attend the appeals fixed for hearing on 5May2015
in the information commissioner Mr. Gajendra Yadav court.
1 message
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> Sun, May 3, 2015 at 11:18 PM
To: “sec.sic” <sec.sic@up.nic.in>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, urgentaction
<urgentaction@
Since all the concerned accountable public functionaries remained failed in
providing justice against the tyranny and arbitrary decision of Information
Commissioner Mr. Gajendra Yadav so your applicant boycott his court on 5
May2015 as plea of your applicant Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 10:43 AM was
overlooked by
C.I.C. Of UPSIC.
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether any action was taken by chief information commissioner on the following e-mail representation. What does he want to prove by procrastinating and adopting lackadaisical approach in redressing the grievances of common people?
Whether chief information commissioner UPSIC would be
instrumental in providing sought information to your applicant.
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P
Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 6:58
PM
To: “sec.sic” <sec.sic@up.nic.in>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, secycic
<secycic@ nic.in>, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, urgentaction <urgentaction@
Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Delete | Show original
An application under subsection 3 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005.
11 July 2015
17:32
To
Chief Information Commissioner
Government of Uttar Pradesh , Indira
Bhawan .
Sixth floor ,Lucknow
AppellantYogi M. P. Singh
MohallaSurekapuram ,Jabalpur Road
DistrictMirzapur (Uttar Pradesh)
Respondents1Public Information Officer, State Information Commission Government of Uttar Pradesh , Indira Bhawan .
Sixth floor ,Lucknow
2First appellate authority, State Information Commission Government of Uttar Pradesh , Indira Bhawan .
Sixth floor ,Lucknow
PrayerNot a single point information was made available by PIO ,UPSIC Lucknow as sought by appellant through the RTI Communique 07/03/2015 and blunder on the part of PIO is that he didn’t deem fit to make correspondence in regard to sought information and
first appellate authority also took under teeth the provisions of transparency act by overlooking the first appeal of appellant made under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 dated 14May2015. Copy of R.T.I. Communique and first appeal is attached
with this representation.
                                                     This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook  the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                           ‘Yours  sincerely
                            Yogi M. P. Singh
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India .
Created with Microsoft Office OneNote 2007
One place for all your notes and information


4 attachments — Scan and download all attachments
Why UPSIC didn’t make available.one
45K Scan and download
Gmail – Whether chief information commissioner UPSIC would be instrumental in providing sought information to your applicant_.pdf
260K View as HTML Scan and download
Gmail – Re_ To direct chief information commissioner , Government of Uttar Pradesh to be instrumental in providing sought information_.pdf
420K View as HTML Scan and download
Gmail – My inner conscious don’t allow to attend the appeals fixed for hearing on 5-May-2015 in the information commissioner Mr.pdf
246K View as HTML Scan and download
Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Delete | Show original


   Your message has been sent.   

Add star  

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh

<yogimpsingh@gmail.com>

AttachmentFri, Aug 14, 2015 at 10:11 PM
To: “sec.sic” <sec.sic@up.nic.in>, secy-cic <secy-cic@nic.in>
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: “Yogi M. P. Singh” <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 22:02:29 +0530
Subject: Why UPSIC didn’t make available sought information even after
the second appeal?


4 attachments — Scan and download all attachments
Why UPSIC didn’t make available.one
45K Scan and download
Gmail – Whether chief information commissioner UPSIC would be instrumental in providing sought information to your applicant_.pdf
260K View as HTML Scan and download
Gmail – Re_ To direct chief information commissioner , Government of Uttar Pradesh to be instrumental in providing sought information_.pdf
420K View as HTML Scan and download
Gmail – My inner conscious don’t allow to attend the appeals fixed for hearing on 5-May-2015 in the information commissioner Mr.pdf
246K View as HTML Scan and download

2 comments on Why chief information commissioner is adopting lackadaisical approach in redressing the grievances?

  1. Not a single point information was made available by PIO ,UPSIC Lucknow as sought by appellant through the RTI Communique 07/03/2015 and blunder on the part of PIO is that he didn't deem fit to make correspondence in regard to sought information and
    first appellate authority also took under teeth the provisions of transparency act by overlooking the first appeal of appellant made under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 dated 14‐May‐2015.

  2. Mostly the chief information commissioners come from kingdom of anarchy i.e.Babudom. How any thing positive can be expected from him. Whether a bureaucrat can provide justice to people of country who remains always self centred. . O God save our country from clutches of corrupt public functionaries.
    Pockets are filled with corrupt money and all the luxuries items are available at the home ,then why they will attend the grievances of people which will block all such facilities.Undoubtedly growing corruption is on its zenith and its victim is poor and downtrodden section . Government is providing huge sum as emoluments of salary but there is no contentment is showing that deterioration is soon.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: