Hon’ble Sir -Job of UPSIC is to be instrumental in providing sought information to information seeker but here UPSIC itself withholding the sought information. Whether such system will not lose its credibility in the eye of citizenry. This is obligatory duty of the accountable public functionaries of constitutional institutions to maintain the dignity and integrity of the office so the faith of people of state may remain intact . Here most startling fact is that concerned staff didn’t consider it appropriate to correspond in regard to RTI Communique which is sheer unjustified and grass violation of provisions of Right to Information Act 2005.
With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that chief secretary office sent following e-mail to your applicant which is attached with this representation in detail. Here this question arises that why action was not taken by the chief information commissioner UPSIC on this appeal?
Date: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 3:33 pm
Subject: To direct chief information commissioner , Government of Uttar Pradesh to be instrumental in providing sought
To direct chief information commissioner , Government of Uttar Pradesh
to be instrumental in providing sought information.
14 January 2015
An appeal under subsection 3 of section 19 of Right to
Information Act 2005.
Chief Information commissioner,
Government of uttar pradesh
Indira Bhawan ,sixth floor, Lucknow (U.P.)
Subject‐Since the sought information is concerned with the
working of the office of chief information commissioner
,Government of uttar pradesh so his/her PIO must be directed to
made available point wise information as sought through RTI
communique dated 27.10.2014.
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether any action was taken on the following e-mail representation . Whether it is not signal chaos and lawlessness culminating into sheer anarchy. Whether the system is not handicapped to provide justice to poor and downtrodden section.
My inner conscious don’t allow to attend the appeals fixed for hearing on 5May2015
in the information commissioner Mr. Gajendra Yadav court.
Since all the concerned accountable public functionaries remained failed in
providing justice against the tyranny and arbitrary decision of Information
Commissioner Mr. Gajendra Yadav so your applicant boycott his court on 5‐
May‐2015 as plea of your applicant Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 10:43 AM was
C.I.C. Of UPSIC.
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether any action was taken by chief information commissioner on the following e-mail representation. What does he want to prove by procrastinating and adopting lackadaisical approach in redressing the grievances of common people?
Whether chief information commissioner UPSIC would be
instrumental in providing sought information to your applicant.
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P
Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 6:58
Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Delete | Show original
An application under subsection 3 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005.
11 July 2015
Chief Information Commissioner
Government of Uttar Pradesh , Indira
Sixth floor ,Lucknow
Appellant‐Yogi M. P. Singh
Mohalla‐Surekapuram ,Jabalpur Road
District‐Mirzapur (Uttar Pradesh)
Respondents‐1‐Public Information Officer, State Information Commission Government of Uttar Pradesh , Indira Bhawan .
Sixth floor ,Lucknow
2‐First appellate authority, State Information Commission Government of Uttar Pradesh , Indira Bhawan .
Sixth floor ,Lucknow
Prayer‐Not a single point information was made available by PIO ,UPSIC Lucknow as sought by appellant through the RTI Communique 07/03/2015 and blunder on the part of PIO is that he didn’t deem fit to make correspondence in regard to sought information and
first appellate authority also took under teeth the provisions of transparency act by overlooking the first appeal of appellant made under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 dated 14‐May‐2015. Copy of R.T.I. Communique and first appeal is attached
with this representation.
This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
Yogi M. P. Singh
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India .