Why B.D.O. Bahariya or DPRO Allahabad not interested to provide information?

Registration Number COPRG/R/2020/60003
Name Vivek Singh
Date of Filing 03-06-2020
RTI Fee Received    10
Online Reference Number IK0ANZYAA4
Transaction Status Success
Request filed with COMMISSIONER OFFICE PRAYAGRAJ
 Contact Details of Nodal Officer  
Telephone Number 9454417212
Email-ID comm.alld4218@gmail.com
Registration Number COPRG/R/2020/60003
Name Vivek Singh
Date of Filing 03/06/2020
Status RTI REQUEST RECEIVED as on 03/06/2020
  Nodal Officer Details  
Telephone Number 9454417212
Email-ID comm.alld4218@gmail.com

Online RTI Request Form Details

Public Authority Details :-
* Public Authority COMMISSIONER OFFICE PRAYAGRAJ
Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-
Registration Number COPRG/R/2020/60003
Date of Filing 03/06/2020
* Name Vivek Singh
Gender Male
* Address S/O Nagendra Bahadur Singh , Village Jaysinghpur, Post Gheenpur
Pincode 212507
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Pincode Details not provided
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-9935426309
Email-ID arunpratapsingh904[at]

gmail[dot]com

Request Details :-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Description of Information Sought SPIO denied information and suggested to submit hard copy to concerned.Matter is concerned with village panchayat-Saraijeet Ray Urf Purebhawa, Development Block-Bahariya, District-Allahabad.

1-Provide estimates of every work of the current five-year term in Village Panchayat.

2-Provide work booklet of five years of the aforementioned panchayat.

3-Provide total invoices of the current five-year term.

4-Provide detail of Avases made in aforementioned Panchayat.

5-Provide detail of toilets made under SBM and fund spent,

* Concerned PIO Nodal Officer
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))

Whether circulars are issued by the government to be overlooked by its staffs concerned ipso facto obvious?

Wednesday, June 3, 2020

11:51 AM

Subject

Re: Whether circulars are issued by the government to be overlooked by its staffs concerned ipso facto obvious?

From

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh

To

pmosb; presidentofindia@rb.nic.in; supremecourt; urgent-action; cmup; hgovup@up.nic.in; csup@up.nic.in; uphrclko; lokayukta@hotmail.com

Sent

Saturday, April 7, 2018 2:19 AM

Attachments

Vivek Singh.pdf

Subject-During congress regime wage material ratio was 60:40 but Modi Government planned to reduce it 51:49 which will be instrumental to alarming hike in the unemployment in the country.

 

Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to following submissions as follows.

 

1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that

What is the meaning of wage material ratio in the context of MGNREGA? For example, if wage material ratio is 60:40 and the total budget is 1000 rupees then 600 rupees will be kept aside for the payment of wages and 400 rupees will be kept aside for purchasing of materials ( for example cement, concrete, tools etc.). But now NDA govt is planning to change this ratio to 51:49 if this happens then from now onward 510 rupees will be spent on wages and 490 rupees for materials use, out of total 1000 rupees budget.

 

2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take a glance at the attached document with this representation. The first page is explicitly showing that in the gram panchayat –Saraijeet Ray urf Purebhava, Development block-Bahariya, Post-Gheenpur, District –Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, a bricks road has been made by spending public fund Rs.134665 only by the Gram Pradhan and Secretary. This bricks road actually made under the MGNREGA and 11 Labourers, each worked for seven days which is obvious from the second page of the attached document with this representation.

 

3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that if we calculate the total amount paid to labourers, then we found that amount is Rs.13475 only. Consequently, the total amount spent on the material is Rs.121190 only. Here, in this case, wage material ratio is near about 11:100 which is ridiculous and against the spirit of MGNREGA act. Whether such steps of the government will not increase the hunger deaths in the country and state? Whether for individual gains, the community can be kept at the bay as being done in the state at the large scale? MGNREGA was brought up by the government of India to curb the hunger deaths in the country because of unemployment consequently, grown poverty.

 

This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness, and chaos in an arbitrary manner by making the mockery of law of land. This is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer in order to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.

                                                                Yours sincerely

                                              विवेक सिंह  S/O नागेन्द्र बहादुर सिंह, Mobile number-९९३५४२६३०९Village-जयसिंहपुर, ग्राम पंचायत-सरायजीतराय उर्फ़ पुरेभावा, Post-Gheenpur, District-Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-212507.

 

On 5 February 2018 at 23:33, Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> wrote:

Whether government orders are passed for showpiece as such treatment is being faced by circular issued by the government of Uttar Pradesh concerned with the wall painting of development works being carried out in the village panchayats by spending public funds. Huge salary is paid to public staffs in order to ensure proper implementation of government scheme with proper utilisation fund but B.D.O. Bahariya, Allahabad and subordinate staffs prefer to sit in their offices instead of site inspection and review the compliance of order and circulars passed by the government.

Whether it is not the reflection of rampant corruption in the system that issue of wall painting is concerned with the obligation of B.D.O. Bahariya, Allahabad as well as D.P.R.O. Allahabad is being overlooked by them.Noncompliance with government order is itself reflected from the report of B.D.O. Bahariya, Allahabad and D.P.R.O. Allahabad submitted on the jansunwai portal of government of Uttar Pradesh. Whether the attached circular was not served to entire D.P.R.Os.and Block Development Officers in the state?    

Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to following submissions as follows.

1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that please you Hon’ble Sir may take a perusal of letter of B.D.O. Bahariya, Allahabad addressed to District Magistrate Allahabad attached with this representation.

Matter raised with the non-compliance of the circular but D.P.R.O. Allahabad cunningly diverting the attention to confuse the applicant in order to pave the way for wrongdoers to syphon government fund. If DPRO Allahabad is really interested in the enquiry why not he invites an enquiry against those who remained failed to ensure the compliance of the circular issued by the government? Why DPRO and BDO are not interested in the wall painting of development works on the village panchayats? Whether such dereliction in the duty is not promoting corruption in the system when the motive of the circular is ipso facto obvious to curb grown corruption in the system but not being implemented in letters and spirit? 

आवेदन का विवरण

शिकायत संख्या

40017518006470

आवेदक कर्ता का नाम:

Vivek Singh

आवेदक कर्ता का मोबाइल न०:

9935426309,9935426309

विषय:

Whether government provides the fuel to travel in relations and carrying the children to public schools and back to government residence or inspect the progress of implementation of public work Please take seriously this reminder and make efforts to curb the rampant corruption now turned into anarchy instead of procrastination and reluctant approach श्री मान जी जब राजाज्ञा शासनादेश जैसी बातो का कोई मतलब ही नही तो सुशासन की बात ही बेमानी हो जाती है सिर्फ सुशासन सुशासन चिल्लाने से आराजकता सुशासन में नही बदल जाती है |सिर्फ एक बात खंड विकास अधिकारी बहरिया इलाहाबाद से पूछा जाय की इतनी शिकायतों के बावजूद क्या कोई वे या कोई उनका स्टाफ ग्राम पंचायत में गया था |क्या कार्यालय में बैठ कर आख्या प्रस्तुत की जाती है | श्री मान जी  क्षेत्र वर्क का  मतलब यह होता है की  लोक प्राधिकारी कभी  क्षेत्र में जाय ही नही  और सोचने की बात यह है की  सरकार  अपने  मतहतो  को  सरकार  द्वारा  निर्धारित  न्यूनतम  वेतन मान का  १० गुना से  भी  ज्यादा देती है  और जहा देश की  आधी  आबादी  भूख मरी  के कगार पर  है  वही  कुछ  लोग  अपने   ऐशो  आराम में  सब  कुछ भूल  चुके है | आज  प्रार्थी  नया  प्रत्यावेदन  प्रस्तुत  करना  चाहता था  किन्तु  बीसों  बार  प्रयास करने के बाद भी  जनसुनवाई पोर्टल प्रत्यावेदन नही लेता और फीडबैक विचाराधीन है भैया कब निर्णय होगा फीडबैक पर |Justice delayed is justice denied

नियत तिथि:

12 – Feb – 2018

शिकायत की स्थिति:

निस्तारित

रिमाइंडर :

फीडबैक :

दिनांक 04/02/2018को फीडबैक:- How much surprising is that matter is concerned with the compliance of the government order and its transparent implementation but DPRO Allahabad is trying to divert the attention to other issues like enquiry and rules elaborated under panchayat raj act concerned with action against Gram Pradhan and others which is not relevant to raised issue? शिकायत संख्या -40017517018761 was originally submitted and consequent complaints are ramifications of original complaint when concerned staffs including DPRO Allahabad showed insolence to implications and implementations of the government order. Whether such faces are not behaving like inscrutable face of sphinx? Why the simple and straight issue concerned with the implementation of government order is being made complex by the cryptic dealings of concerned public staffs including DPRO also? शिकायत संख्या -40017517018761 निस्संदेह खंड विकास अधिकारी बहरिया इलाहाबाद एक इमानदार अधिकारी है किन्तु शासनादेशो का पालन कराना सभी अधिकारी का प्राथमिक कर्तव्य होता है |खंड विकास अधिकारी ग्राम पंचायतसरायजीतराय उर्फ़ पुरेभावा में खुद अपनी आखों से वाल पेंटिंग का सच देखे | The matter is concerned with wall painting and implementation of government order in the development block –Bahariya, District-Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, India in short ग्राम पंचायतसरायजीतराय उर्फ़ पुरेभावा, विकासखंडबहरिया, तहसीलफूलपुर, जिलाइलाहाबाद Subject-In regard to wall painting on the walls of panchayat Bhawan, in accordance with the direction of government as issued through its GO शासनादेश संख्या -722016261133-3-2016-142016 दिनांक-07-अक्टूबर -2016 पंचायतीराज अनुभाग -3 जो की समस्त मंडलायुक्त उत्तर प्रदेश व समस्त जिलाधिकारी उत्तर प्रदेश शासन को संबोधित है | उद्देश्यग्रामीण क्षेत्रो में निर्मित पंचायत भवनों पर विकास परकयोजनाओं के कार्यकलापो को वाल पेंटिंग के माध्यम से

फीडबैक की स्थिति:

फीडबैक प्राप्त

आवेदन का संलग्नक

अग्रसारित विवरण

क्र.

.

सन्दर्भ का प्रकार

आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी

आदेश दिनांक

अधिकारी

को प्रेषित

आदेश

आख्या दिनांक

आख्या

नियत दिनांक

1

अंतरित

ऑनलाइन सन्दर्भ

28 – Jan – 2018

जिलाधिकारी

इलाहाबाद,

01 – Feb – 2018

जांच आख्या अवलोकनार्थ सादर प्रेषित है |

निस्तारित

2

आख्या

जिलाधिकारी ( )

29 – Jan – 2018

जिला पंचायत राज अधिकारी

इलाहाबाद,

पंचायती राज विभाग

नियमनुसार आवश्यक कार्यवाही करें जांच आख्या अवलोकनार्थ सादर प्रेषित है |

31 – Jan – 2018

Attachment

निस्तारित

From <http://jansunwai.up.nic.in/TrackGraviancePopup.aspx?complainno=40017518006470&Emaild=arunpratapsingh904@gmail.com&IsOldNew=N&Type=2>

2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Honesty speaks and dishonesty always remains silent and most surprising is that wall painting of not a single development work is being carried out because of phobia to be exposed in public. Think about the credibility of public staffs who don’t care about the government orders and circulars, how may be credible if the pious job of enquiry may be handed over to them.

  3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether it is not the reflection of tyranny, insolence and schizophrenic way of functioning that repeated pursuance of the applicant in regards to wall painting, not a single inch replaced the concerned accountable staffs from their cryptic and suspicious path. The plethora of anarchy is not only depriving the weaker and downtrodden section of their rights but also causing great damage to our social ethical values. Which jurisprudence allowed government orders may not be complied by its staffs concerned and accountable staffs may remain its mute spectators?

Whether any painting concerned with the development has been carried out in these buildings attached with this representation if not why government order passed by accountable public functionaries in the state is not being taken seriously by the staffs at the district level? Most surprising is that accountable public functionaries in the state are also reluctant in order to get compliance with the Government Order passed in order to promote transparency and accountability in the development work being carried out by the local unit.

                                            This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness, and chaos in an arbitrary manner by making the mockery of law of land. This is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer in order to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.                                                                                                                Yours sincerely

                                                                                                      Yours sincerely

                                              विवेक सिंह  S/O नागेन्द्र बहादुर सिंह, Mobile number-९९३५४२६३०९Village-जयसिंहपुर, ग्राम पंचायतसरायजीतराय उर्फ़ पुरेभावा, Post-Gheenpur, District-Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-212507

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Yogi M. P. Singh
5 months ago

I do not think that they will provide information concerned with the developmental activities carried out in the village Panchayat Purebhawa because they know that every developmental work was carried out only on paper and nothing was done on the ground. They will never show interest to be exposed in the public by providing the information in the public domain. Now a days corruption has increased through out the government machinery. Here this question arises that why information was not made available on the earlier application in which mockery of Right to Information Act 2005 was done by the state public information officer, department of Panchayati Raj, government of Uttar Pradesh?

Preeti Singh
5 months ago

GO शासनादेश संख्या -722016261133-3-2016-142016 दिनांक-07-अक्टूबर -2016 पंचायतीराज अनुभाग -3 जो की समस्त मंडलायुक्त उत्तर प्रदेश व समस्त जिलाधिकारी उत्तर प्रदेश शासन को संबोधित है | उद्देश्य –ग्रामीण क्षेत्रो में निर्मित पंचायत भवनों पर विकास परकयोजनाओं के कार्यकलापो को वाल पेंटिंग के माध्यम से|
Think about the gravity of the situation that when they are not providing information under Right to Information Act 2005, how will they provide information through wall painting to every citizen? Credibility of the government is going down day by day in this largest democracy in the world.

Beerbhadra Singh
Beerbhadra Singh
5 months ago

If everything is ok then why B.D.O. Bahariya and government of Uttar Pradesh especially its department of Panchayati Raj is not interested to provide information to the information seeker and they are violating the provisions and committing offence but not providing information. Right to Information act 2005 was brought up by the government of India to promote transparency and accountability in the public offices but it seems that because of corruption Right to Information act 2005 has been put into the dustbin by government itself.

Bhoomika Singh
5 months ago

Earlier sought information was not provided by the concerned on the flimsy ground which is mockery of The Right to Information act 2005 which motive is to to enhance transparency and accountability in the public offices in the Government of India. But it seems that this August act will never accomplish its goal because of the rampant corruption in the government machinery and it is most unfortunate that our public functionaries who are drawing you salary from the public exchequer are not satisfied with their salary and indulged in enhancing the backdoor income other than the original salary provided by the government of India. Such practices are like cancer for our government machinery.