Why appellate authority of reserve bank of India is in state of dilemma in taking decision.

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Why appellate authority of reserve bank of India is in state of dilemma in taking decision as matter is concerned with massive corruption in the banking sector.
1 message
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> Sat, May 7, 2016 at 6:39 PM
To: presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, “hgovup@up.nic.in” <hgovup@up.nic.in>, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, csup <csup@up.nic.in>, secy-cic <secy-cic@nic.in>, dhirendra.k@nic.in

Why reserve bank of India is silent on massive corruption in the banking sector is not signal of failure of government. To be silent on the sought information by the first appellate authority of reserve bank of India is the reflection that there is no transparency and accountability in the working of public authority  reserve bank of India.
07 May 2016
17:15
With due respect your applicant/petitioner wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Hon’ble Prime Minister Sir when application is submitted under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 ,then first appellate authority take appropriate decision on submitted appeal within 30 days from date it receives the application and made available that decision to the appellant. But it seems that in order to shield wrongdoers ,appellate authority of regulatory body/reserve bank of India  of banking institutions has forgotten this provision of Right to Information Act 2005.
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that position of central government is worse than state government because on jansunwai portal of state government ,all type of grievances are redressed but on PG portal of central government ,no grievances are entertained if concerned with non availability of information to information seeker. Consequently it is not feasible to make complaint against wrongdoers who are making mockery of Right to Information Act 2005 .
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that your applicant submitted the first appeal under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 through registered post on 18/03/2016 which was delivered in the office of First Appellate Authority, reserve bank of India on 28/03/2016 . It is unfortunate that reserve bank of India still didn’t make available the decision of its first appellate authority. Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take a glance of attached documents with this representation.
                                    
This is humble request of your appellant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook  the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your appellant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                                      ‘Yours  sincerely
                            Yogi M. P. Singh Mobile number-7379105911
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India


R.T.I. Communique to CPIO Reserve bank of India..pdf
1537K

2 comments on Why appellate authority of reserve bank of India is in state of dilemma in taking decision.

  1. Hon'ble Sir your applicant submitted the first appeal under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 through registered post on 18/03/2016 which was delivered in the office of First Appellate Authority, reserve bank of India on 28/03/2016 . It is unfortunate that reserve bank of India still didn't make available the decision of its first appellate authority.

  2. Every one knows that why public authority conceals the sought information by information seeker? Since the matter is concerned with additional and multiple charging of from the account of paying one so it is serious offence.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: