Who submitted Complaint Number: 202021011014657 must be disclosed by Banking Ombudsman Kanpur?

Gmail Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Closure letter – Complaint Number: 202021011014657
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 6 December 2020 at 13:40
To: cms.bokanpur@rbi.org.in, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>

Closure letter – Complaint Number: 202021011014657

The complainant did not submit the aforementioned complaint.

Here this question arises that who submitted this complaint to mislead the applicant and manage the subsequent grievance of aggrieved Anjali Kumari disposed of?

An application under Article 32 of the constitution of India to seek justice for aggrieved student Anjali Kumari belonging to weaker and downtrodden section and others facing similar problems as this matter is only a model.

To

Hon’ble Chief Justice of India/companion judges

Supreme court of India, New Delhi

Prayer-Sir, court may direct Government of Uttar Pradesh to take action in the matter concerned with submitting forged representation in the applicant’s name which is forgery.

Complaint no–201920011032606 submitted on 22-June-2020.

Aggrieved applicant Anjali Kumari submitted a representation on 03/02/2020 by appearing in person as directed by Lucknow head office of S.B.I. and State Bank of India is procrastinating on the issue.

Where is inordinate delay if application/complaint submitted against the inaction of S.B.I. on the representation dated 03/02/2020 of aggrieved student on 22/06/2020?

I think that Banking ombudsman made the more procrastination itself, ipso facto from attached documents.

For more detail, visit on this page.

Rs.12900 was drawn from the account of S.C. girl Anjali Kumari from Sirsa Branch of S.B.I. now running away

.

After the indiscriminate decision of the Banking Ombudsman Kanpur by taking the recourse of the limitation falsely, disposed of the aforementioned complaint arbitrarily.

Subsequent complaint elaborating the lacunae and mistake in the disposal of aforementioned complaint made before the Banking Ombudsman to rectify the error might cause travesty of justice.

Subsequent complaint Number-202021011010419

Date of complaint-14-Oct-2020

I attach detail to this representation.

This complaint is still pending in the office of Banking Ombudsman Kanpur.

Corrupt dealing of Banking Ombudsman Kanpur-Complaint dated-  14-Oct-2020 of the applicant is pending before the  Banking Ombudsman Kanpur BUT Closure letter – Complaint Number: 202021011014657 SUBMITTED on 19-Nov-2020, they disposed of obviously from trailing e-mail. Whether the dealings of Banking Ombudsman Kanpur is not mysterious?

खुदा भी आसमाँ से जब जमी पे देखता होगा |

इस मेरे प्यारे देश को क्या हुआ सोचता होगा||

This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos arbitrarily by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray for you, Hon’ble Sir.

Date-06/12/2020           Yours sincerely

                              Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.

Yogi M. P. Singh did not submit the Complaint Number: 202021011014657, then who made the mockery of the land by the submitting the complaint before the banking ombudsman Kanpur quite obvious from the following closure report sent to G-mail of the applicant Yogi M. P. Singh.

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>

Closure letter – Complaint Number: 202021011014657

BO Kanpur <cms.bokanpur@rbi.org.in> 1 December 2020 at 15:24
Reply-To: cms.bokanpur@rbi.org.in
To: “yogimpsingh@gmail.com” <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>

 

भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक

 

________________________________RESERVE BANK OF INDIA_____________________________

Dated 01/12/2020

Anjali Kumari

 

 

 

 

Dear Sir / Madam

 

बैंकिंग लोकपाल योजना 2006 (बीओएस2006)

The Banking Ombudsman Scheme 2006 (BOS-2006)

Complaint No: 202021011014657 dated 19/11/2020 against STATE BANK OF INDIA .

 

 

Please refer your captioned complaint which is duplicate of your previous complaint with number 201920011032606. Complaint number 201920011032606 had already been closed under clause 13(1)(a) of BOS, 2006, reply of which has been sent to you vide our email dated October 07, 2020.

 

 

2. As no new issue has been  raised in your present complaint., the same has been closed  under Clause  9(3)( c ) of BOS-2006 as a complaint once closed cannot be re-adjudicated.

 

 

3. Details of BOS, 2006 are available on our website:  www.rbi.org.in/commonman.

 

 

4. This communication is sent to you as per the orders of the Banking Ombudsman.

 

 

Yours faithfully

p. Banking Ombudsman

BO Kanpur

Grievance Status for registration number : DEABD/E/2020/72366

Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt
06/12/2020
Received By Ministry/Department
Financial Services (Banking Division)
Grievance Description

Financial Services (Banking Division) >> Fraud

Department/Bank/Financial Institute : Reserve Bank of India
———————–
Complaint no–201920011032606 submitted on 22-June-2020

Aggrieved applicant Anjali Kumari submitted a representation on 03/02/2020 by appearing in person as directed by Lucknow head office of S.B.I. and State Bank of India is procrastinating on the issue.
Where is inordinate delay if application/complaint submitted against the inaction of S.B.I. on the representation dated 03/02/2020 of aggrieved student on 22/06/2020?
I think the Banking ombudsman made that more procrastination itself, ipso facto from attached documents.
For more detail, visit on this page.
Rs.12900 was drawn from the account of S.C. girl Anjali Kumari from Sirsa Branch of S.B.I. now running away
After the indiscriminate decision of the Banking Ombudsman Kanpur by taking the recourse of the limitation falsely, disposed of the aforementioned complaint arbitrarily.
Subsequent complaint elaborating the lacunae and mistake in the disposal of aforementioned complaint made before the Banking Ombudsman to rectify the error might
Grievance Document
Current Status
Case closed
Date of Action
15/12/2020
Remarks
As complainant made inordinate delay in reporting the disputed transaction to the bank and so no relief can be granted to the complainant. And so the aforementioned complaint was rejected u/c 13(1)(a) of BOS-2006
Rating
Poor
Rating Remarks
Whether following is not forgery committed by the corrupt coterie of banking ombudsman concerned and his reluc Closure letter – Complaint Number: 202021011014657 The complainant did not submit the aforementioned complaint. Here this question arises that who submitted this complaint to mislead the applicant and manage the subsequent grievance of aggrieved Anjali Kumari disposed of? It seems that Banking Ombudsman is layman to understand the content of the complaints made by the aggrieved people. It is quite obvious they hatched conspiracy to mislead the representative of the aggrieved student Anjali Kumari quite obvious from the attached screenshots with the post but it is unfortunate that our accountable public functionaries will remain failed to take action against the wrongdoer staff and banking ombudsman is working like a corrupt public functionary and his accountability must be checked as his actions are quite suspicious and mysterious and invites investigation in the matter.
Officer Concerns To
Officer Name
Pankaj Kumar Nayak
Officer Designation
Banking Ombudsman_Kanpur
Contact Address
Email Address
obo.kanpur@rbi.org.in
Contact Number
05122305174
4.8 8 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Pratima Parihar
Pratima Parihar
2 days ago

बैंकिंग लोकपाल कानपुर के अंधाधुंध फैसले के बाद, सीमा का पुनर्विचार गलत तरीके से करने के बाद, मनमाने ढंग से उक्त शिकायत का निस्तारण किया गया।

God Man
God Man
2 days ago

Here important topic of discussion is that who submitted the complaint for Anjali Kumari by taking the reference of email of complainant Yogi M P Singh? Undoubtedly it is conspiracy to mislead Yogi M P Singh.

Bhoomika Singh
Bhoomika Singh
1 day ago

Where is the accountability if the wrongdoer can easily escape from the clutches of the law which is quite obvious from the contents of the post and no action is being taken against the wrongdoer staff. Governance cannot be good governance through the print and electronic media if the working style of the public functionaries of the government is not good

Preeti Singh
1 day ago

Closure letter – Complaint Number: 202021011014657The complainant did not submit the aforementioned complaint.
Here this question arises that who submitted this complaint to mislead the applicant and manage the subsequent grievance of aggrieved Anjali Kumari disposed of?
Such practice is the integral part of corrupt dealings of the department concerned.