![]() |
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> |
Closure letter – Complaint Number: 202021011014657 |
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> | 6 December 2020 at 13:40 | |
To: cms.bokanpur@rbi.org.in, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org> | ||
|
Yogi M. P. Singh did not submit the Complaint Number: 202021011014657, then who made the mockery of the land by the submitting the complaint before the banking ombudsman Kanpur quite obvious from the following closure report sent to G-mail of the applicant Yogi M. P. Singh.
![]() |
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> |
Closure letter – Complaint Number: 202021011014657 |
Grievance Status for registration number : DEABD/E/2020/72366
Financial Services (Banking Division) >> Fraud
Department/Bank/Financial Institute : Reserve Bank of India
———————–
Complaint no–201920011032606 submitted on 22-June-2020
For more detail, visit on this page.
Rs.12900 was drawn from the account of S.C. girl Anjali Kumari from Sirsa Branch of S.B.I. now running away
After the indiscriminate decision of the Banking Ombudsman Kanpur by taking the recourse of the limitation falsely, disposed of the aforementioned complaint arbitrarily.
Subsequent complaint elaborating the lacunae and mistake in the disposal of aforementioned complaint made before the Banking Ombudsman to rectify the error might
बैंकिंग लोकपाल कानपुर के अंधाधुंध फैसले के बाद, सीमा का पुनर्विचार गलत तरीके से करने के बाद, मनमाने ढंग से उक्त शिकायत का निस्तारण किया गया।
Grievance Status for registration number : DEABD/E/2021/03185
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt
13/01/2021
Who submitted Complaint Number: 202021011014657 must be disclosed by Banking Ombudsman Kanpur?
Closure letter – Complaint Number: 202021011014657
The complainant did not submit the aforementioned complaint.
Here important topic of discussion is that who submitted the complaint for Anjali Kumari by taking the reference of email of complainant Yogi M P Singh? Undoubtedly it is conspiracy to mislead Yogi M P Singh.
Where is the accountability if the wrongdoer can easily escape from the clutches of the law which is quite obvious from the contents of the post and no action is being taken against the wrongdoer staff. Governance cannot be good governance through the print and electronic media if the working style of the public functionaries of the government is not good
Closure letter – Complaint Number: 202021011014657The complainant did not submit the aforementioned complaint.
Here this question arises that who submitted this complaint to mislead the applicant and manage the subsequent grievance of aggrieved Anjali Kumari disposed of?
Such practice is the integral part of corrupt dealings of the department concerned.