Whether the wheel of the judiciary has been jammed if not why pending cases are never heard?

Gmail
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Whether the wheel of the judiciary in this largest democracy in the world has been jammed if not why pending cases are never heard?
1 message
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
10 January 2018 at 14:09
To: supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, hgovup@up.nic.in, csup@up.nic.in, uphrclko <uphrclko@yahoo.co.in>, lokayukta@hotmail.com, “sec. sic” <sec.sic@up.nic.in>
Subject-Whether it is not cheating with the citizenry that although its cases are listed in the cause list but never heard by the court because court either pay heed to fresh cases or unlisted cases. Following a case of the year, 2006 is being listed since six years but never heard in the court by the judge. This is a model of the pending cases languishing in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. Most unfortunate is that next listing date was displaying 01-Jan-2018 but now status is showing that there are no further orders of listing.
With great respect to revered Sir, your applicant invites the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following status is showing that case is to be listed on 01-Jan-2018 but not listed. Undoubtedly if it was listed it might have faced same consequences as facing since six years but there was an expectation. Here this question arises that why did the concerned not list the case as ordered to be listed on 01-Jan-2018 and now status is displaying that there are no further orders of listing. Whether for listing someone was ordering and now he deferred his order of listing the case.
Case Status – Allahabad
Pending
Writ – A / 20121 / 2006 [Mirzapur]
Petitioner:
RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH
Respondent:
STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
Counsel (Pet.):
P.C. CHAUHAN
Counsel (Res.):
C.S.C.
Category:
Service-Writ Petitions Relating To Secondary Education (non Teaching Staff) (single Bench)-Salary And Allowances
Date of Filing:
10/04/2006
Last Listed on:
02/08/2017 in Court No. 17
Next Listing Date:
To be listed on 01/01/2018
This is not an authentic/certified copy of the information regarding the status of a case. Authentic/certified information may be obtained under Chapter VIII Rule 30 of Allahabad High Court Rules. Mistake, if any, may be brought to the notice of OSD(Judicial)(Computer).
  2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following status is showing that there are no further orders of listing the case which explicitly shows that listing is subjected to the arbitrariness of the concerned staffs.
Status – Allahabad
Pending
Writ – A / 20121 / 2006 [Mirzapur]
Petitioner:
RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH
Respondent:
STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
Counsel (Pet.):
P.C. CHAUHAN
Counsel (Res.):
C.S.C.
Category:
Service-Writ Petitions Relating To Secondary Education (non Teaching Staff) (single Bench)-Salary And Allowances
Date of Filing:
10/04/2006
Last Listed on:
08/01/2018 in Court No. 19
Next Listing Date:
There is no further orders of listing.
This is not an authentic/certified copy of the information regarding status of a case. Authentic/certified information may be obtained under Chapter VIII Rule 30 of Allahabad High Court Rules. Mistake, if any, may be brought to the notice of OSD(Judicial)(Computer).
3-It is submitted to the Hon’ble Sir that it is most unfortunate that numerous grievances were submitted including following one and those attached to this representation but couldn’t cultivate any result. CPIO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad had made the mockery of the Right to Information Act 2005 repeatedly but who will take action against him? Whether anarchy can be tolerated in the name of independence of the judiciary or because of fear contempt of court proceedings.
Grievance Status
Registration Number
:
DEPOJ/E/2018/00074
Name Of Complainant
:
Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt
:
09 Jan 2018
Received by
:
Department of Justice
Forwarded to
:
Department of Justice
Contact Address
:
Jaisalmer House,
Mansingh Road,
New Delhi110011
Contact Number
:
23381496
Grievance Description
:
Please ensure transparency in the function of High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. Please take a glance of attached PDF documents with this representation.
Current Status
:
CASE CLOSED
Your Feedback
:
Poor
Date of Action
:
09 Jan 2018
Details
:
The grievance has been forwarded to the Registrar General, Allahabad High Court for further action, as appropriate.
Status as on 09 Jan 2018
                                        This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that it can never be justified to overlook the rights of the citizenry by delivering services in an arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap the benefit of loopholes in the system and depriving poor citizens of the right to justice. Therefore it is need of the hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.
                                          Yours sincerely
                             Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District- Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Not a single listed case is being heard in the High Court OF judicature at Allahabad.pdf
365K

From <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=423f69194e&jsver=ZIYKXPBT0B4.en_GB.&view=pt&search=sent&th=160df3922e943080&siml=160df3922e943080

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh

Whether it is not cheating with the citizenry that although its cases are listed in the cause list but never heard by the court because court either pay heed to fresh cases or unlisted cases. Following a case of the year, 2006 is being listed since six years but never heard in the court by the judge. This is a model of the pending cases languishing in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. Most unfortunate is that next listing date was displaying 01-Jan-2018 but now status is showing that there are no further orders of listing.

Preeti Singh
2 years ago

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Case Status – Allahabad

Pending
Writ – A / 20121 / 2006 [Mirzapur]

Petitioner: RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH
Respondent: STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
Counsel (Pet.): P.C. CHAUHAN
Counsel (Res.): C.S.C.
Category: Service-Writ Petitions Relating To Secondary Education (non Teaching Staff) (single Bench)-Salary And Allowances
Date of Filing: 10/04/2006
Last Listed on: 08/01/2018 in Court No. 19
Next Listing Date: To be listed on 20/01/2018

This is not an authentic/certified copy of the information regarding status of a case. Authentic/certified information may be obtained under Chapter VIII Rule 30 of Allahabad High Court Rules. Mistake, if any, may be brought to the notice of OSD(Judicial)(Computer).

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M. P. Singh

There is rampant corruption in our system and High court of judicature at Allahabad is not untouchable of it.

Bhoomika Singh
Bhoomika Singh
7 months ago

Because of appointment of incompetent people as judge of the various High Court is lowering the standard of judiciary in this country. Think about the gravity of situation that several Chief Justices of India accepted this fact that here judgements are sold but they did not take any solid and strong step in order to curb such practices even at the several instances of time it has been proved that there is rampant corruption in the Judiciary but no solid and strong steps are being taken to curb the corruption in judiciary. Here reader of the judicial member just seated in side of judicial member takes the bribe before the judicial member and judicial member overlooks it.

Bhoomika Singh
Bhoomika Singh
7 months ago

Why closed circuit television cameras are not used in the courts of Indian Judiciary if the corruption is rampant everyone knows? Because of appointment of incompetent people as judge of the various High Court is lowering the standard of judiciary in this country. Think about the gravity of situation that several Chief Justices of India accepted this fact that here judgements are sold but they did not take any solid and strong step in order to curb such practices even at the several instances of time it has been proved that there is rampant corruption in the Judiciary but no solid and strong steps are being taken to curb the corruption in judiciary. Here reader of the judicial member just seated in side of judicial member takes the bribe before the judicial member and judicial member overlooks it.