Whether we are ruled by rule of law or sheer anarchy if rule of law why poor students are being looted?
Tuesday, January 14, 2020
1:49 PM
Subject |
Whether we are ruled by rule of law or sheer anarchy if rule of law why poor students are being looted? |
From |
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M. P. Singh |
To |
supremecourt; pmosb; presidentofindia@rb.nic.in; urgent-action@ohchr.org; cmup; csup@up.nic.in; hgovup@up.nic.in; uphrclko@yahoo.co.in |
Sent |
Tuesday, January 14, 2020 1:40 PM |
An application under Article 32 of the Constitution of India.
To
The Hon’ble chief justice of India /companion judges
Supreme court of India, New Delhi, India
Subject-Article 32, the constitution of India, right to Justice but this right is not reaching to citizens of this country because of rampant corruption in the government machinery. Whether the remedy is available to only those whose e-mail is digitally signed? Whether it is really apex court of India which took action on postcards and envelops? It seems that those things written in books are not the ground reality of our society as every truth is censored in this largest democracy in the world.
Prayer-Please, ensure the refund of Rs.5000 extorted by the government of Uttar Pradesh from the B. Ed. Aspirants applied for counselling on the large scale in the name of admission fee but not refunded when admission was not taken by them even when numerous representations were submitted by them for a refund of advance taken a fee for admission. When the counselling fee is the only Rs.750, then why Rs.5000 was additionally charged from the poor vulnerable students. The matter is concerned with the deep-rooted corruption but no accountable public functionaries are taking seriously it. Whether education is promoted in this way in this largest democracy in the world?
Petitioner-Yogi M. P. Singh Mobile number-7379105911
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road
District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh Pincode-231001
Versus
Respondent-1-Chief Secretary
Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow
2- Principle Secretary
Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow
After five months of procrastination, a reply of Government of Uttar Pradesh is as follows-
Coordinator B.ed. Entrance Exam ki aakhya ke anupalan me aapko avagat karana he ki abhyarthi ko college allot ho chuka he jis karan agrim shulk wapasi yogya nahi he.
Sir whether coordinator is a rulemaking body or Judge of High court or supreme court? Whether such draconian rules can be allowed which may deprive poor students on the large scale from the hard-earned money of his / her parents arbitrarily and this fund may reach into the pockets of the corrupt public functionaries indirectly?
Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that 51A. Fundamental duties It shall be the duty of every citizen of India (a) to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem;(h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform;
(i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence;
(j) to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement.
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that after many months passed and numerous representations submitted before the Government of Uttar Pradesh, an arbitrary reply was submitted by the coordinator of exam conducting body in the following grievance.
संदर्भ संख्या : 40019919035094 , दिनांक – 13 Jan 2020 तक की स्थिति
आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण : शिकायत संख्या:–40019919035094
आवेदक का नाम–Yogi M P Singh
विषय–An application on behalf of the aggrieved applicant Anjaney Shukla name of the father Mr Sachchida Nand Shukla and more detail and representation is attached to the grievance in the PDF form. Matter is concerned with the Mahatama Jyotiba Phule Rohilkhand University , Bareilly Uttar Pradesh.श्री मान जी प्रवेश के नाम पर ५००० रुपये लिए गए और उसको कॉलेज के द्वारा ली जाने वाले फीस में इंक्लूड किया जाना था किन्तु जब प्रवेश नहीं हुआ तो प्रवेश शुल्क वापस होना चाहिए | श्री मान जी जब सरकार निजी प्रबंध तंत्रों के मदद से ५१ से ६० हजार रुपये हर सेमेस्टर में वसूलती है तो सरकार के अधीनस्थों में मानवता कहा से हो सकती है हर पग पग पर फीस ली गई तो फिर प्रवेश के नाम पर जो ५००० रूपये वसूली गई है फीस ली गई है और जब प्रवेश नहीं हुआ तो एडवांस में जमा शुल्क वापस हो जो न्याय सगत है |
विभाग –एम.जे.पी. रुहेलखण्ड विश्वविद्यालय, बरेली
शिकायत श्रेणी –नियोजित तारीख–08-11-2019
शिकायत की स्थिति–स्तर –विश्वविद्यालय
पद –रजिस्ट्रार प्राप्त रिमाइंडर–
प्राप्त फीडबैक – फीडबैक की स्थिति – संलग्नक देखें –
नोट– अंतिम कॉलम में वर्णित सन्दर्भ की स्थिति कॉलम-5 में अंकित अधिकारी के स्तर पर हुयी कार्यवाही दर्शाता है!
अधीनस्थ द्वारा प्राप्त आख्या :
क्र.स. |
सन्दर्भ का प्रकार |
आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी |
आदेश/आपत्ति दिनांक |
आदेश/आपत्ति |
आख्या देने वाले अधिकारी |
आख्या दिनांक |
आख्या |
स्थिति |
संलगनक |
1 |
अंतरित |
ऑनलाइन सन्दर्भ |
24-10-2019 |
|
रजिस्ट्रार –एम.जे.पी. रुहेलखण्ड विश्वविद्यालय, बरेली |
30-12-2019 |
Coordinator B.ed. Entrance Exam ki aakhya ke anupalan me aapko avagat karana he ki abhyarthi ko college allot ho chuka he jis karan agrim shulk wapasi yogya nahi he |
निस्तारित |
|
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following representation was submitted on 14-Aug-2019 but remained unsuccessful in drawing the attention of the concerned public functionaries.
|
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> |
Applicant paid advance college fee Rs.5000 and counselling fee Rs.750 but did not take admission then why procrastination in a refund of Rs.5000?
2 messages
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> |
14 August 2019 at 22:23 |
||||||||||||||||||
To: pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, hgovup@up.nic.in, csup@up.nic.in, uphrclko <uphrclko@yahoo.co.in> |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following representation was submitted on 24-Oct-2019 but remained unsuccessful in drawing the attention of the concerned public functionaries. Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> |
24 October 2019 at 14:41 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To: pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, hgovup@up.nic.in, csup@up.nic.in, uphrclko <uphrclko@yahoo.co.in> |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
परहित सरिस धर्म नहि भाई |
परपीड़ा सम नहि अधमाई ||
प्राइमरी स्कूल नीबी गहरवार में आज ये सब महान वाक्य मात्र खंडहर बचे है किन्तु मेरी स्मृतियों में कभी भी न मिटने वाला अमिट छाप छोड़ा है |
Every coin has two sides likewise each decision /act consists of two aspects i.e. Positive and negative aspect and which aspect accepted depends on the mentality of an actor. An actor who accepts positive aspect inculcate good virtues and becomes great that is why it is rightly said that man is great by his deeds and character nothing else.
6-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Greek philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle around 350 BC. Plato wrote: “Where the law is subject to some other authority and has none of its own, the collapse of the state, in my view, is not far off; but if law is the master of the government and the government is its slave, then the situation is full of promise and men enjoy all the blessings that the gods shower on a state”. Likewise, Aristotle also endorsed the concept of Rule of law by writing that “law should govern and those in power should be servants of the laws.”
This is a humble request of your appellant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos in an arbitrary manner by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer in order to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your appellant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.
Date-14-01-2020 Yours sincerely
Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.
Sir whether coordinator is a rule-making body or Judge of High court or supreme court? Whether such draconian rules can be allowed which may deprive poor students on the large scale from the hard-earned money of his / her parents arbitrarily and this fund may reach into the pockets of the corrupt public functionaries indirectly?
Undoubtedly there is substantial evidence that concerned public functionaries which are staff of the Government of Uttar Pradesh has looted the vulnerable students of the state belonging to the poor families but it is unfortunate that despite several representations where submitted before the concerned accountable public functionaries but it is unfortunate that no public functionaries. took action in the matter whether it is not reflection of Anarchy in the Government of Uttar Pradesh where grievances of the public concerned with the public interest especially deep-rooted corruption are overlooked by the public functionaries concerned?
5000 rupees was taken in the name of advance college fees and kept in his pocket.
Is this justice ?
I will get my money refunded and nothing else. Yogi Aditynath Sir, please grant me justice as applicant is sinking in this anarchy.