Whether we are living in good governance or sheer mismanagement.

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Whether we are living in good governance or sheer mismanagement.
1 message
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 20 November 2016 at 10:42
To: presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, secy-cic@nic.in

Matter is concerned with the serious allegations of corruption, CPIO ,R.B.I. made available misleading implicit reply, first appellate authority concerned didn’t deem it fit to entertain first appeal and central information commission didn’t take any action even in six months after receiving the R.T.I. Communique . Whether this is reflection of positive approach of central government to curb the rampant corruption grown in our public offices. 
20 November 2016
09:43
With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
  1. 1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that what is the cause of undue delay? On the part of central information commission ipso facto obvious. 
EU212673089IN  
Booked at
Booked On
Destination
Pincode
Tariff
Article
Category
Delivered at
Delivered on
Not Available
Not Available
Not Availa
Not availa
Not Available
R K Puram (Main) S.O (110066)
25/05/2016
Detailed Track Events For EU212673089IN 
Date
Time
Office
Event
21/05/2016
05:36:33
ICH MIRZAPUR
Bag Despatched to Lalganj (Mirzapur) S.O
22/05/2016
20:08:39
MIRZAPUR RMS
Item bagged for ICH MIRZAPUR
22/05/2016
20:17:31
ICH MIRZAPUR
Item Received
23/05/2016
02:24:22
ICH MIRZAPUR
Item bagged for NSH ALLAHABAD
23/05/2016
02:52:18
ICH MIRZAPUR
Bag Despatched to NSH ALLAHABAD
23/05/2016
10:38:56
NSH ALLAHABAD
Bag Received
23/05/2016
10:39:56
NSH ALLAHABAD
Bag Opened
23/05/2016
10:39:57
NSH ALLAHABAD
Item Received
23/05/2016
14:45:37
NSH ALLAHABAD
Item bagged for NSH NEW DELHI
23/05/2016
14:45:51
NSH ALLAHABAD
Bag Despatched to NSH NEW DELHI
25/05/2016
00:53:51
NSH NEW DELHI
Bag Received
25/05/2016
04:11:37
NSH NEW DELHI
Bag Received
25/05/2016
05:41:58
NSH NEW DELHI
Item Received
25/05/2016
05:42:58
NSH NEW DELHI
Item bagged for R K Puram (Main) S.O
25/05/2016
05:42:58
NSH NEW DELHI
Bag Despatched to R K Puram (Main) S.O
25/05/2016
08:27:13
R K Puram (Main) S.O
Bag Received
25/05/2016
08:35:18
R K Puram (Main) S.O
Item Received
25/05/2016
08:35:18
R K Puram (Main) S.O
Bag Opened
26/05/2016
11:43:43
Lalganj (Mirzapur) S.O
Bag Received
26/05/2016
11:47:36
Lalganj (Mirzapur) S.O
Bag Opened
25/05/2016
13:25:00
R K Puram (Main) S.O
Item Delivered
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Whether it is justified that First Appellate authority of Reserve Bank of India may not entertain first appeal.
1 message
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Sun, May 22, 2016 at 12:17 AM
To: secy-cic <secy-cic@nic.in>, dhirendra.k@nic.in, “ak.dash” <ak.dash@nic.in>
Bcc: supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, cenvigil@nic.in
An appeal under subsection 3 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 .
To
                       Hon’ble chief information commissioner of India
                             
                                           The Central Information Commission.
                             Second Floor. ‘B Wing,
                                August Kranti Bhawan,
                                 Bhikaji Cama Place,
                                  New Delhi .110066
Prayer-Hon’ble sir if deems fit ,may pass the following order in accordance with the law.
1-C.P.I.O. Reserve bank may be directed to provide the sought information.
2-Pecuniary penalty may be imposed on the aforesaid CPIO for wilfully violating the provisions of right to information Act 2005 .
3-Disciplinary action may taken against the first appellate authority for not entertaining the first appeal submitted by the appellant under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005.
  Appellant-Yogi M. P. Singh
Mohalla-Surekapuram ,Jabalpur Road
District-Mirzapur (Uttar Pradesh)      
Versus
Respondent-1-Central public information officer
 in short CPIO
Reserve Bank of India
Respondent-2-First appellate authority
Reserve Bank of India .
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that even a lay man is apprised with the famous quote “Justice delay is justice denied “but it is unfortunate that our public functionary seems to be either ignorant or deliberately overlooking the aforementioned quote in order to pave the way for wrongdoers to achieve ulterior motives.
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether in this largest democracy in the world, arbitrariness and tyranny of public servants can be allowed. Whether in this way Right to Information Act 2005 will ensure transparency and accountability in the public offices and achieve its motives. 
                             This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook  the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                                                                 Yours  sincerely
                                                     Yogi M. P. Singh Mobile number-7379105911
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India


R.T.I. Communique to CPIO Reserve bank of India..pdf
1993K

3 comments on Whether we are living in good governance or sheer mismanagement.

  1. Matter is concerned with the serious allegations of corruption, CPIO ,R.B.I. made available misleading implicit reply, first appellate authority concerned didn't deem it fit to entertain first appeal and central information commission didn't take any action even in six months after receiving the R.T.I. Communique . Whether this is reflection of positive approach of central government to curb the rampant corruption grown in our public offices.

  2. Hon'ble Sir that whether in this largest democracy in the world, arbitrariness and tyranny of public servants can be allowed. Whether in this way Right to Information Act 2005 will ensure transparency and accountability in the public offices and achieve its motives.Whether concerned public functionaries are not making Right to Information Act 2005 handicapped itself.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: