श्री मान जी चीफ एरिया मेनेजर इंडियन आयल कारपोरेशन की रिपोर्ट दिनांक ०५–०५-२०१७, MPANG/E/2017/02347 के सन्दर्भ में और चीफ एरिया मेनेजर इंडियन आयल कारपोरेशन की रिपोर्ट दिनांक २९-०५-२०१७ , MPANG/E/2017/02917 के सन्दर्भ में , इन दोनों रिपोर्टो में कोई अंतर नही है अर्थात चीफ एरिया मेनेजर इंडियन आयल कारपोरेशन का ब्योहार एक तोते जैसा है उनको जैसा रटा दिया गया है वैसा ही बोलते है अर्थात उनके रिपोर्ट की विश्वसनीयता जीरो है ३-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that प्रार्थी का दावा है की उसने एजेंसी को समस्त दस्तावेज उपलब्ध कराये किन्तु विन्धेश्वरी गैस एजेंसी की लापरवाही से उसे सब्सिडी से वंचित होना पद रहा है और यह एक बहुत बड़े भ्रस्टाचार से जुडा मुद्दा है चीफ एरिया मेनेजर अपने ऑफिस में बैठ कर कैसे इस निष्कर्स पर पहुच सकते है की प्रार्थी द्वारा आधार कार्ड जमा नही किया गया यदि प्रार्थी के पास आधार कार्ड है तो वह आधार कार्ड नही जमा करेगा और अपनी सब्सिडी छोड़ देगा विन्धेश्वरी गैस एजेंसी के दस्तावेजो को तलब किया जाय और उनकी जांच की उपरांत ही निष्कर्स पर पहुचा जाय महत्वपूर्ण बात यह है मामला सैकड़ो ग्रामीणों के सब्सिडी से सम्बंधित है जिसे गैस एजेंसी और आयल कारपोरेशन के स्टाफ मिल कर निगल लेना चाहते है प्रार्थी को न्याय मिलना चाहिए ग्रामीण कम पढ़े लिखे है तो उनका कोई उनका हक मारे क्या मोदी जी यही चाहते है T
Subject-Incredibility in the dealings of chief area manager of Indian Oil Corporation Limited in regard to subsidy to domestic gas connection holders reflects that Vindheshwari Gas Service is acting in caucus with local staffs of Indian Oil Corporation Limited. According to communication dated 16/06/2017 which is first page of attached documents, as per the notification under section 7 of Aadhar act dated 30th September 2016 by ministry of petroleum and natural gas, government of India, Aadhar authentication or proof of possession of Aadhar number or proof of enrolment for Aadhar availing L.P.G. Subsidy beyond 30th November 2016. After 30th November 2016, failure to produce Aadhar or proof of Aadhar enrolment without any valid reasons, L.P.G. subsidy was liable to be withheld from first December 2016. Withhold means -Irregular: withheld; withheld, hold back; 1-refuse to hand over or share. The father is withholding the allowance until the son cleans his room 2-Retain and refrain from disbursing; of payments. My employer is withholding taxes. Deprive means- 1-take away possessions from someone e.g. The Nazis stripped the Jews of all their assets 2-keep from having, keeping, or obtaining 3-take away Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to following submissions as follows. 1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether to withhold subsidy is tantamount to deprive of subsidy? Most surprising is that staffs of Indian Oil Corporation Limited understood that to withhold subsidy means to deprive of subsidy to those who are entitled to it and getting since many years. Whether it is justified to deprive poor underprivileged villagers of subsidy arbitrarily by colluding with the staffs of Indian Oil Corporation Limited? Most important thing is that whether concerned agency really sought Aadhar card from the beneficiaries of subsidised gas cylinders and why they had not taken if the Aadhar card was available to them since two and half years and more surprising is that beneficiary’s bank accounts are linked with their Aadhar card. Here most important question is that who are ultimate beneficiaries if poor underprivileged villagers were deprived of subsidised gas cylinders?It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that please you Hon’ble Sir may take a glance of historic judgement delivered by apex court of India. Accountability must be ensured in order to achieve good governance. Even in respect of administrative orders Lord Denning M.R. in Breen v. Amalgamated Engineering Union (1971 (1) All E.R. 1148) observed “The giving of reasons is one of the fundamentals of good administration”. In Alexander Machinery (Dudley) Ltd. v. Crabtree (1974 LCR 120) it was observed: “Failure to give reasons amounts to denial of justice”. Reasons are live links between the minds of the decision taker to the controversy in question and the decision or conclusion arrived at”. Reasons substitute subjectivity by objectivity. The emphasis on recording reasons is that if the decision reveals the “inscrutable face of the sphinx”, it can, by its silence, render it virtually impossible for the Courts to perform their appellate function or exercise the power of judicial review in adjudging the validity of the decision. Right to reason is an indispensable part of a sound judicial system, reasons at least sufficient to indicate an application of mind to the matter before Court. Another rationale is that the affected party can know why the decision has gone against him. One of the salutary requirements of natural justice is spelling out reasons for the order made, in other words, a speaking out. The “inscrutable face of a sphinx” is ordinarily incongruous with a judicial or quasi-judicial performance.