Whether to spare public personnel accountable for large scale massacre in communal riots is justified.

Whether to spare
the public personnel accountable for large scale massacre in the communal riots
took place in Mujaffar Nagar and Shamli district can be justified. Whether in
this way government of Uttar Pradesh will provide justice to victims of riots. Whether
justice is available to common people in this state. Most surprising is that
law order remained failed but those accountable to maintain it were not made
accountable for their failure to maintain it.
The report of
Justice Vishnu Sahaay commission on the clashes between the Hindu and Muslim
communities   is startling as he made
accountable only two staffs of government. Commission made recommendation
against an I.P.S. And an Inspector. Most surprising is that association of
I.P.S. Is lobbying in order to shield S.S.P. Subhas Chandra Dubey. Most
surprising is that if government of Uttar Pradesh
is
succumbed  under undue pressure of I.P.S.
Loby ,then no one will be made accountable for this large scale massacre which
rocked the country.
The clashes between the
Hindu and Muslim communities in 
Muzaffarnagar andShamli districts of Uttar Pradesh, India in August–September 2013, resulted in
at least 62 deaths including 42 Muslims and 20 Hindus
[3] and injured 93
and left more than 50,000 displaced.
[5][6][7][8] By 17 September,
the 
curfew was lifted from
all riot affected areas and the army was also withdrawn.
[9]
The riot has been
described as “the worst violence in Uttar Pradesh in recent history”,
with the army, as a result, being deployed in the state for the first time in
last 20 years.
[10] Supreme Court of India while hearing
petitions in relation to the riots held the 
Akhilesh Yadav led Samajwadi Party, prima facie guilty of negligence in
preventing the violence and ordered it to immediately arrest all those accused
irrespective of their political affiliation. Court also blamed the Central
government for its failure to provide intelligence inputs to the Samajwadi
Party-ruled state government in time to help sound alerts.
[11]
If we talk about those who wants
to protect the I.P.S. Made accountable by commission for this sensational riot
,where was this lobby when I.P.S. Amitabh Thakur was persecuted by the
influential politician in the state and still justice is far away from this
I.P.S. Well known for its impeccable integrity. 
Whether it is justified that an honest senior rank police officer is
being persecuted by senior accountable public functionaries in the Government
of Uttar Pradesh and Government of India is the mute spectators of this
injustice.
LUCKNOW:
The Vigilance department on Tuesday conducted searches at the Gomti Nagar
residence of suspended IPS officer Amitabh Thakur.
The
raids come two days after Thakur lodged a complaint at city’s Vibhuti Khand
police station, seeking registration of a case against UP Vigilance
Establishment Director Bhanu Pratap Singh and others for alleged
misrepresentation of facts in the Vigilance inquiry report against Thakur.
In view of your friend, every one has right to seek the justice and
whatever was done by Mr. Amitabh Thakur Ji with sole aim to seek justice but as
reaction to holy act, counter action was made in order to wreak vengeance.
Thakur
was suspended after he lodged a police complaint against Samajwadi Party
national president Mulayam Singh Yadav, accusing him of threatening the IPS on
phone. He has been attached to the Director General of Police (DGP)
headquarters ever since.
Whether in this largest democracy in the world ,no one has right to
seek justice . If some one is threatening an I.P.S. Personnel on his mobile
phone and he makes efforts to seek legitimate action ,then what is wrong?
Whether it is justified that entire machinery may be misused in order to harass
an honest police personnel. Every one knows that there is no rule of law in the
government of Uttar Pradesh. Whether a country has right to get permanent
membership of U.N.O. where rampant violation of human rights and its prime post
holder be remained mute spectators of such practices.
In his
police complaint against the Vigilance department chief and his subordinates,
Amitabh had stated that an open inquiry was ordered against him by the
government but the Vigilance department has prepared a list of properties owned
by his parents, brother, wife and an organisation that he was earlier attached
to, and showed them as his assets.
He said neither he nor his relatives were given a chance to
explain about the acquisition of those properties. 
Whether 
this is not arbitrary action of the government. Both constitutional and human
rights are being violated of this honest police officer.
The
Vigilance had lodged an FIR against Thakur last month.
LUCKNOW: Suspended IPS officer Amitabh Thakur on Thursday sat in
front of Hazratganj police station along with some friends as part of his
`indefinite sit-in’ to protest police inaction in Mulayam threat case. 
Why police
is procrastinating in this matter and adopting lackadaisical approach to reach
on conclusive stage of the case ? Whether such act of state police is not
lowering the dignity of police organization .
The police has not lodged FIR against Samajwadi Party chief
Mulayam Singh Yadav so far despite Lucknow Chief Judicial Magistrate Som Prabha
Mishra’s specific directions on September 16. The SP government had also
assured High Court on Wednesday that the FIR will be registered forthwith. But
no action has been taken as yet. 
Where is independence of judiciary? This is job of
independence of judiciary to provide all kind of protection to judicial member
so that he may perform his job fearlessly and without bowing its head before
undue pressure. It is most unfortunate that independence is being used 
to  protect wrongdoers in the judiciary and withholding delivery of
justice to poor.

1 comment on Whether to spare public personnel accountable for large scale massacre in communal riots is justified.

  1. Where is independence of judiciary? This is job of
    independence of judiciary to provide all kind of protection to judicial member
    so that he may perform his job fearlessly and without bowing its head before
    undue pressure. It is most unfortunate that independence is being used
    to protect wrongdoers in the judiciary and withholding delivery of
    justice to poor.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: