Whether to maintain the security of transactions was not the accountability of state bank of India.

Whether in Modi Government Grievances are resolved arbitrarily. Where is gone the additional payment . If a person is honest ,then whether he will accept the belongings from others. But in the government of India ,every wrongdoings are justified.

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh yogimpsingh@gmail.com

May 11 (1 day ago)

to cmadminr2.zovns
Whether to serve the students comes under commercial activities according to rules of your bank. 

According to  your quoted statements ,your applicant perform commercial activities through his savings account. 
Whether you have not understood that your applicant is social worker from the activities of your applicant and to help the people his main job. 
If your applicant were a business man ,then his family is not on the verge of hunger. 
Hon’ble Sir there are several business man who are on paper flopped business man and their millions of loans are remitted by the bank staffs by colluding with them and most surprising is that they are still running on the roads in four wheelers like tavera and cruisers . Would you like to give me how much turn over of my business as you have quoted to shield you on flimsy ground? Commercial activities are those which are performed with the motive to gain profit. Ask the concerned what is taken from them by your applicant. 
Please be informed that this is not fault on the fault on the part of website of CRPF only but also the part of your bank because you could not ensure the safe transaction. How the multiple payments could be feasible against the single application number. Still your bank couldn’t take back the additional payments made against the application numbers. 
                                                                           Yours sincerely 

                                                                          Yogi M. P. Singh 

Whether open loot of citizenry is good governance ,then what is jungle rule? Honesty must be in act instead of speculations. {3684604} 

Inbox
x

SBI Contact Centre contactcentre@sbi.co.in

6:42 PM (3 hours ago)

to me
Gmail couldn’t verify that sbi.co.in actually sent this message (and not a spammer).  Learn more
Dear Sir/Madam,
Thank you for writing to us at State Bank Contact Centre.
We regret for the inconvenience caused to you.
With reference to your grievance regarding status of the complaint under ticket numberPT9992224113172, we would like to inform you that complaint was registered on dated 03/05/2016 and the same has been attended and closed on the 10/05/2016.
As per the resolution, we would like to inform you that as confirmed with merchant the transaction IG0BWMDER4 was successful and settled.
Below are the contact details of the branch:

STD Code:
05442
Phone Number:
222979
Email ID:
sbi.12731@sbi.co.on

For any further assistance or queries, please contact us through:

  • 24X7 Toll free Helpline No.18004253800 and 1800112211 and Toll No.08026599990.
  •  writing us at contactcentre@sbi.co.in

Assuring you of our best services at all times.

From: yogimpsingh@gmail.com
Sent:Friday, May 06, 2016 10:05:05 PM
To: presidentofindia@rb.nic.in; pmosb ; supremecourt ; urgent-action ; SBI Contact Centre ; “gm.customer@sbi.co.in” ; cm2it.cms@sbi.co.in; sbi.1273
Subject: Whether open loot of citizenry is good governance ,then what is jungle rule? Honesty must be in act instead of speculations.

Whether this is signal of good governance as promised by Prime Minister Narendra Modi Ji during election campaign.
06 May 2016
21:43
With due respect your applicant/petitioner wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
The amounts which were not paid by state bank of India as description given below and latter payments accepted when your applicant made payment fourth time in the Alok Bhardwaj case and second time in Mohammad Akaram case, must be refunded back into the account of your applicant.
The detail is here –
Account Statement for the period 25/04/2016 to 26/04/2016 Account Number 00000034645721675 Branch MIRZAPUR CITY Address S/O RAJENDRA PRATAP
SINGH JABALPURRAOD SUREKHAPURAM BASTI BATHUA POST – SANGAMOHAL MIRZAPUR-Mirzapur 231001 Account Type SBCHQ-GEN-PUB-INDRURAL-INR Account Name Mr. MAHESH PRATAP SINGH MOD Balance 0.00 Drawing Power 0.00 Interest Rate(% p.a.) 4.0 CIF No. 88167135558 IFS Code SBIN0012731 MICR Code 231002032 Nomination Registered Yes Balance as on 25/04/2016 2,846.83

Date (Value Date) Narration Ref/Cheque No. Debit Credit Balance
25-Apr-16 (25-Apr-2016) TO TRANSFER INB CRPF     1725622IG0BWMDER4 TRANSFER TO 355029 100.00 2,746.83
26-Apr-16 (26-Apr-2016) TO TRANSFER INB Commission of IG0BWMDER4- IG0BWMDER4ICN3157918 TRANSFER TO 319 12.00 2,734.83
26-Apr-16 (26-Apr-2016)  TO TRANSFER INB CRPF     1752849IG0BWOUVQ4 TRANSFER TO 355029  100.00 2,634.83
 26-Apr-16 (26-Apr-2016) TO TRANSFER INB CRPF     1753563IG0BWOXPD4 TRANSFER TO 355029 100.00 2,534.83
 27-Apr-16 (27-Apr-2016) TO TRANSFER INB Commission of IG0BWOUVQ4-   IG0BWOXPD4ICN3265238 TRANSFER TO 319 12.00   2,522.83
  27-Apr-16(27-Apr-2016) TO TRANSFER INB Commission of IG0BWOXPD4-
  IG0BWOXPD4ICN3265238 TRANSFER TO 319 
12.00 2,510.83
27-Apr-2016
(27-Apr-2016)
TO TRANSFER INB CRPF
  1815155IG0BWTSOV0 TRANSFER TO 355029 
100.00  2,163.83
  28­Apr­16 (28­Apr­2016) TO TRANSFER  INB Commission of IG0BWTSOV0­
  IG0BWTSOV0ICN3383970 TRANSFER TO 319
12.00  1,811.83

2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Rs.100 +commission Rs.12 ,  Rs.100 +commission Rs.12,  Rs.100 +commission Rs.12 and  Rs.100 +commission Rs.12 deducted by the state bank of India from the account of your applicant  but didn’t pay C.R.P.F. Recruitment cell so state bank of India must oblige to return back the aforesaid amount to the account of your applicant.
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that first your applicant had waited one week because branch manager assured me that deducted amount automatically returned back into account within one week .
Please direct state bank of India to refund extra deducted amount from the account of your applicant. {3681393} 

Inbox x
SBI Contact Centre
May 3 (3 days ago)
to me

Dear Sir/Madam,
Thank you for writing to us at State Bank Contact Centre.
We regret for the inconvenience caused to you.
With reference to your grievance, we would like to inform you that we have registered a complaint against the same on 03/05/2016 under the ticket number PT9992224113172.The complaint will be resolved within 10 days from the date of complaint registered.
You can also check the status of the complaint by sending an SMS in the below format:
ATM <Ticket Number> to 567676 after 7 days from the date of complaint registered

4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that first your applicant had waited one week because branch manager assured me that deducted amount automatically returned back into account within one week .

cms.psg@sbi.co.in
May 3 (3 days ago)

    to me

      Mr. MAHESH PRATAP SINGH
      S/O RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH JABALPURRAOD SUREKHAPURAM BASTI BATHUA POST – SANGAMOHAL MIRZAPUR Mirzapur 231001
      Dist: ,
      .
      TelNo: 7379105911

      Dear Sir/Madam,

      COMPLAINT:ONLINE PAYMENT/TRANSFER
      CATEGORY:MERCHANT TRANSACTIONS
      BRANCH:INTERNET BANKING

      We acknowledge receipt of your feedback/complaint and regret the inconvenience caused to you. We have registered your feedback/ complaint under Ticket No:PT9992224113172.We value your feedback/complaint and take it as an enabler in improving the customer service in our Bank

      This is humble request of your appellant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook  the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your appellant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                                            ‘Yours  sincerely
                                  Yogi M. P. Singh Mobile number-7379105911
      Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India

      2 comments on Whether to maintain the security of transactions was not the accountability of state bank of India.

      1. Whether in Modi Government Grievances are resolved arbitrarily. Where is gone the additional payment . If a person is honest ,then whether he will accept the belongings from others. But in the government of India ,every wrongdoings are justified.It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that Rs.100 +commission Rs.12 , Rs.100 +commission Rs.12, Rs.100 +commission Rs.12 and Rs.100 +commission Rs.12 deducted by the state bank of India from the account of your applicant but didn't pay C.R.P.F. Recruitment cell so state bank of India must oblige to return back the aforesaid amount to the account of your applicant.

      2. Approximately more than thousand personal banking activated in Mirzapur district alone through state bank of India. There are several bank which are ready to provide its services and they are
        More honest comparatively. First of all ,they must refund the illegally deducted amount .Whether this is not anarchy.

      Leave a Reply

      %d bloggers like this: